Is Bryan Lunduke a right-wing shitlord?

Dial 8, faggot.

Attached: Dial-8-not-9.png (1080x530, 261K)

?

tell him urself beta cuck

Based on his looks, very likely.

Ring-wing libertarians are just even more naive aut-righters.

>anti-specially abled people
is it that hard to just say disabled?

seems insulting to not call it what it is

As a liberal, I hate it when people put words in our mouths by pretending this is the kind of shit we actually think / complain about and then mocking us accordingly. People who tout the social persecution complex meme are about 2% actual liberals and 98% falseflagging alt-righters.

>t. not actually a liberal

Jow Forums is bad enough without you shitting it up further.

Jesus fucking christ user it means dialate and become the the over 40% percentage of trannies that kill themselves

Are you denying that Bryan Lunduke represents everything wrong and regressive about STEM?

No, I'm definitely actually a liberal. I strongly believe in things like environmental conservationism, educational reform, economic reform toward the goal of closing the wage gap, cultural reform to encourage inclusion for non-cis-white-males, and going up against the one percent. However, unlike what you people seem to think a liberal is, I ACTUALLY believe in these goals, and am busy actually caring about what needs to be done on a larger scale to achieve them, so I couldn't care less about what some brainwashed rando says about muh nignogs / muh jews / muh trannies. Let the sad disenfranchised brainwashing victims scream all they want, if we want to actually solve these problems then our attention belongs elsewhere.

idk you sound like a nazi to me.

You arent a liberal.
And no alt righters are barely a thing at this point.

Yeah, aside from the parts about believing in killing anyone, believing anyone is inherently superior or inferior to anyone else, or placing sweeping blame on an entire ethnoreligious demographic for economic problems, I pretty much am. That's pretty much what liberalism is. Naziism minus everything people know Naziism for.
>You arent a liberal.
I disagree.
>alt righters are barely a thing at this point
Alt righters, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, whatever. They all exist, they all share a handful of similar views and also a broad scope of other views besides that, and because of the diversity of those broad scopes of other views, they all insist they not be lumped in with one another. But at the end of the day, you know who I'm talking about.

You sound like a white male out of touch with the struggles of women and POC.

See, this is what I'm talking about. You're not who you're pretending to be, you're a false-flagging right-winger gaslighting me. Which is what 98% of people who talk like you just did are.

Youtube morons are not technology.

You need to recognize your privilege for even being able to think that these issues aren't important when we are terrified to leave our homes in the America of Trump's white male terror.

Quit gaslighting me.
Besides, I didn't even say the issues you're talking about aren't important. On the contrary, I said that BECAUSE these issues are important, REAL liberals don't spend their time bitching about them to brainwashed rightards and tiptoeing on eggshells around forbidden words. Only right-wing gaslighters do that.

Literally why does it matter?

you can't gaslight straight cishet white men

Thank you. Finally someone who gets it and doesn't pretend not to get it just to gaslight liberals.

literally nothing you said has to do with liberalism
you're talking about progressive politics, which has nothing to do with liberalism

If these issues are as important as you say then you should quit your job and encourage your employer to replace you with a badass black or brown girl.

OP, are you retarded?

I'm not even het dumb alt-right bitch
Quit gaslighting me, fuck you.
Nice very rare dubs

Attached: 61UYXqQwkkL._SY679_.jpg (441x679, 25K)

wow, look at this dumpster fire of a thread. No wonder the US is at the brink of a second civil war.

you dont even have to pretend this is gaslighting
say any vague bullshit about some right-leaning talkshow host on reddit or twitter and you'll get the same retarded responses and arguments
people just want hate on shit

dub trips nigga kek rolls hard

you have a lot of anger that I think you should deal with lest you want to be a bad influence on your wife's son. Maybe you should consider separation? I'd ask your bull pronto if I were you. Mine was happy to oblige!

Anyway, what I said has everything to do with liberalism, you just don't realize it because the shit you think is liberalism is just 98% right-wing gaslighting and you actually fell for it.
Just like this guy.

What is "neato rare?"
Is it like medium rare but neato?

ok retard

Why does this guy only interview other white men? It's a valid question.

There are at least two kinds of right wingers, these kinds of people , and people who fall for it and think those kinds of people are actually liberals. There's a great deal of overlap between the two as well.

>liberalism
Stop using that word, you are not liberals, you are just filthy COMMIES.

Attached: liberals.png (1000x517, 535K)

This man is a saint.

t. brainlet who fell for the gaslighting

Okay and there's one kind of liberal, idiots like you.
Nice job being as divisive and the gaslighters you decry you fucking faggot.

;-)

I'm 12 and what is gaslighting?

>there are two kinds of people
that's what we're trying to tell you!

Attached: 1544655348625.png (491x491, 250K)

Gaslighting is falseflagging for the specific purpose of making someone doubt themselves.

Falseflagging is spoofing your beliefs.

Literally who

I thought gaslighting was pretending something that's obviously happening isn't happening. That would make YOU the gaslighter.

Yes, that's a specific kind of gaslighting, but it has to be A) deliberate and B) for the purpose of making people doubt themselves. If not B, it's just a specific kind of falseflagging, not gaslighting. If not A, it's just called being misinformed.

Anyway, no idea what you're talking about in regard to me being the one who's gaslighting. I presume what you mean is that liberals really are like this and I'm only pretending the contrary. In which case you're just another brainwashing victim. You fell for the right-wing gaslighting.

>STOP GASLIGHTING ME!!

Attached: 1554623350093.png (960x1440, 3.5M)

>We need more non-white-males instead of white males in these roles

Are you really saying this doesn't happen?

t. brainwashing victim

I'm saying the only people who really say this are right-wingers who want people to believe this is what the left is concerned with.

t. nazi

t.

They're just the grown-up version of that kid in middle school who drew the anarchy symbol on everything.

.

Yeah you're legit gaslighting this thread.

cbsnews.com/news/ai-bias-problem-techs-white-male-workforce/

Interesting new marketing ploy Bryan.

News outlets are right-run, they're run by the 1%. Since the economic beliefs of the right are in the interest of the 1%, and the 1% have so much power and influence, it's very easy for them to force this gaslighting campaign into the news, universities, etc. They've created a truly compelling illusion that the left wants to take your freedom away.

it's gaslightception

>He thinks that CBS is right-wing

I think you're just far-left and think that most of the left agree with you, but they really don't. Most of the "left" in this country is centrist neoliberals who are 100% behind this and mass migration.

I'm just calling it like I see it, literally every modern industry and social outlet is engineered to villainize our cause and keep people pouring money into republicans' pockets. They're all pretending to be us, and it's even worse when some of us join in due to being genuinely too stupid to tell.

Why would so many people "pretend to be you" to the extent that it literally is the opposition party to Trump?

The Democrats made the conscious decision to ignore unions and go after upper-middle class professionals that are onboard with neoliberalism.

I just really don't buy it at all. I'm pretty sure most of the centrist neoliberals you're talking about are secretly no different from the right winger who made this thread. It's all just increasingly elaborate covert sarcasm, all the way down.

> (You) #
>Why would so many people "pretend to be you" to the extent that it literally is the opposition party to Trump?
I just told you, it's to keep the 1% rich.
>The Democrats made the conscious decision to ignore unions and go after upper-middle class professionals that are onboard with neoliberalism.
Fuck the democrats, they're just covert right wingers too. The entire government in its current structure is just a puppet for republican lobbyists anyway.

Come on man, this is getting increasingly impossible to believe. I'm sure OP was just trying to do a satire of this whole phenomenon that is a real thing. I am willing to admit this isn't historically what would qualify as left-wing pro-worker and pro-equality politics, but it s what is currently called liberalism/progressivism.

youtube.com/watch?v=SCwhlZtHhWs

>everyone on my side I don't agree with is actually from the other side
What a dangerous mindset

I guess it counts as a real thing if it has real effects, which it definitely does, things like affirmative action really happen, and people belonging to demographics that were once oppressors definitely do wind up unjust casualties, there's no denying that. But even so, the perpetrators are still just people being covertly sarcastic to shame real leftists by association, even if they are organizing it on a large scale like this, that just proves how desperate they are.

I don't think they are trying to shame people who disagree with what you are saying you disagree with.

That reminds me of "I don't disagree with not disagreeing."

liberalism in its proper form is basically 18th century libertarian philosophy you socjus chucklefucks appropriated the term.

nobody itt has ever heard the words "no true scotsman"

Regardless, I feel I've made my stance clear enough that the specific words I may have used to express it have ceased to matter.

I don't buy into the idea that it's a fallacy.

>News outlets are right-run
state of you

Attached: 1533268081809.png (500x526, 131K)

>placing Aristotle with jews and niggers

Fucking disgusting

If that's really meant to be the state of me, the graph is upside-down.

That is too generous, it's really just the top 2 leftmost squares, and the argument is, should we be 100% stalin, or 95% stalin?

Imagine being this delusional. Literally every single mega corp on the face of the planel welcomes globohomo with open arms. You're just angry that meritocracy hasn't been completely wiped out yet. Ah, yes, people being judged solely on merit, as opposed to their made up fucktard gender, or race, the horror! Meritocracy scares the fuck out of pussies like you, because you can't compete in the market without a handicap. Kill yourself, tranny.

>Literally every single mega corp on the face of the planel welcomes globohomo with open arms.
Yeah, so that people like you will get mad about it and pay Republicans more money, my point exactly.

No one who is concerned about globohomo is giving the republicans money, you dimwit. The republicans are the enemy too, they just want to get to the same place as the democrats, only slower.

This guy gets it

>No one who is concerned about globohomo is giving the republicans money,
It's hilarious that you think that. Imagine not even knowing that all your money is going to republican lobbyists

I haven't given any money to any political organization, you massive retard. Even if what you said about the corporations is true, it doesn't matter one bit to my worldview. The corps are the enemy, regardless of whether they support the republicans or democrats, because both of them are the enemy too.

If you aren't a shitlord astroturfing, you're quite bad at this. Dilate.

>The corps are the enemy, regardless of whether they support the republicans or democrats, because both of them are the enemy too.
We can agree on that at least.

None of that is liberalism, retard. You're views are unironically closer to national socialism than liberalism.
>inb4 hurr durr nazi
Yeah, it was an actual political ideology, and was much more complex than just muh jews.

...

>believing in killing anyone, believing anyone is inherently superior or inferior to anyone else, or placing sweeping blame on an entire ethnoreligious demographic for economic problems, I pretty much am.
Not what nazism is. Read a book, retard.

>Not what nazism is.
Actions speak louder than words.

You do realize that the Axis was way more racially diverse than the Allies were, right? There were way more non-whites supporting the Axis war effort, both economically and militarily.

Point being what exactly

The idea that they were obsessed with race is a joke.