Why gnu/linux is faster than windows?

why gnu/linux is faster than windows?

Attached: AowL5Mj.png (769x798, 392K)

Other urls found in this thread:

linuxfoundation.org/membership/members/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's not

less bloated

I want to explode in to megumins 14 year old pusy

based stinky neet loonix devs beating dumb wangblows knuckle dragger "programmers"

Cute thread.

Because it doesn't have a proper anything, from memory manager to GUI. Everything is extremely primitive compared to Windows.
Basically the same reason MS-DOS is faster than Windows.

its only faster on old hardware, which is nice if you have old hardware

better syscall latency because server autism from google and co, better filesystems, better drivers.

Over 29gbs less of bloat

because its better. faster is better.

Because making things faster is fun, so everyone does it.
Now making things useable is boring, so no one does it.

Attached: 6.jpg (400x519, 44K)

linux is objectively faster on nearly every benchmark largely due to windows being so held back by legacy kernel and filesystem restrictions
windows also has more overhead and "bloat" which slows down things further
windows 11 or whatever microsoft is going to call the new version of windows that ditches all of the legacy restrictions will likely be quite comparable to linux speeds, if not faster

its not. run benchmarks on several scenarios and see for yourself.

except every major benchmark is faster on linux

No. Electricity bits travel at the same speeds across motherboards no matter the operating system

Attached: 1567897476015.png (685x682, 108K)

I want to FUCK Megumin in her underage cunny.

Attached: 8vqFal8.gif (330x620, 773K)

Less Botnet.

> underage
She's like 14 or 16 or whatever in that medieval society.

based meguminposter

Attached: peekaboo2.png (488x488, 193K)

It's hotter if she's underage

Less security features.

based retard

truth bomb

Get on the line.

fpbp

Windows 10 bottlenecks your hard disk. It runs more or less smoothly with a SSD.
GNU/Linux does not do that in normal conditions.

no botnet running in the background
if you use a lighweight desktop environment like icewm, unity, xfce etc...it can be even faster

Me first
Because windows tries to keep compadibility even though it means relying on old hacks.
Also unix-like systems are just more efficient

no bloatnet bollocks or snfry

linux runs old software better than windows 10 does

Old native linux software probably wont even compile
Now if you are talking about wine then it depends due to the implementation of things like opengl/sdl being better on linux.
Touhou 8 for example drops frames on windows when it doesnt on linux.
Also wine can be set up so that specific wine instances that with those old windows hacks can be created per application.
For more information you probably may want to look into how unix systems function

Attached: 1449516142517.gif (367x219, 523K)

No it compiles you just sometimes need to track down old versions of dependencies.

5 seconds for Windows 10
45 seconds on Debian

Linux was never fast.

Linux is just a kernel.

>megumeme poster is retarded
wew

Its faster because it cant run any programs. FL studio, winamp, zbrush, thinkorswim, premiere, flash, no thanks the only software I need is vim.
>FUCK LINUX

Boot speed means nothing.
Especially with the way windows 10 boots.
Which just hybernates the drive.
Btw i turned it it off once and it jumped to 3 minutes to boot for me.
Also linux boot times vary with optimisations that debian never has by default.
Solus 1 used to boot in 2 seconds on netbooks.

> FL studio, winamp, zbrush, thinkorswim, premiere, flash
nonfree garbage

Btw i would also like to add that by your own logic servers are the slowest pieces of crap.
They take a minute or so to even finish posting and head to the bootloader.
Windows 10 for servers takes way longer to boot due to optimisations in the kernel plus startup checks.
Linux is by default a made for embedded and servers so of course it will also do those checks.
You can turn the majority of them off and get a faster boot like like solus without even needing to rely on cheap tricks like hibernation on windows 10

DELETE THIS

Because GNU+Linux isn't constantly reporting your activities to the NSA.

>its only faster on old hardware, which is nice if you have old hardware

Then why it is used in all the supercomputers?

People who use GNU/Linux dont need this non-free bloated software

roastie detected

First of all, its made after UNIX, its not bloated, doesnt have active 9000 backports, has better filesystems, you can optimize and change kernel.

>Primitive
>uses ntfs

Better multitasking support

Attached: IMG_20190909_002138.jpg (648x720, 140K)

Mostly because code that was implemented from Gentoo.
Since as you all know Gentoo was aimed to be fast.(Thats ehy the name.) and kernel/utils people noticed gentoo folks made good code.

so in short install Gentoo

>windows 11 or whatever ... will likely be quite comparable to linux speeds, if not faster
At this rate, it'll probably be a Linux distro anyway. Non-cloud-based PC computing is becoming less and less important to MS, so they aren't likely to expend a lot of extra resources on it. They already closed their PC OS division last year.

Is it, though?
t. Windows hater

>They already closed their PC OS division last year.

Attached: 1524426141649.jpg (1000x1322, 181K)

linux is objectively faster and scores higher on every multi platform benchmark

Wouldn't surprise me honestly. A lot of the development has already been outsourced.

What.

Because capitalism sucks.

linuxfoundation.org/membership/members/
kys tranny

>there are only 500 supercomputers on earth
This is your brain on freetard.

The real reason is that it's open source - which actually works when you have an army of paid programmers to work on it.

Hmm, I wonder why my anime poster friendo

>stinky neet loonix devs
h--hote

Attached: nose.jpg (1800x1200, 70K)

Either low IQ samefag or 3 low IQ mongrels

It's the truth though, but it's a pretty poorly phrased truth.
>from memory manager to GUI. Everything is extremely primitive compared to Windows. Basically the same reason MS-DOS is faster than Windows.
This is true.
>Because it doesn't have a proper anything,
This is complete bullshit.
user is just another modern software """""""developer""""""""""""" who thinks piling on endless layers of abstraction, autistically sticking superfluous runtime sanity checks everywhere that handle situations that aren't even mathematically possible, mountains of computationally intensive GUI code, and endless telemetry and web service reliance, can make bad software magically good.

He's wrong because Linux is a fucking kernel. Every distro has the same memory manager. It's built into the kernel. Why would the GUI need to be the same? That's the point of having freedom. It's all the same retards from /v/ shitting up this board

>Old native linux software probably wont even compile
>probably

so what you're saying is you don't know what you're talking about

We're talking about GNU/Linux here. If a critique applies to Linux, it applies to GNU/Linux. If it applies to GNU, it applies to GNU/Linux. What's the problem?

windows is faster for desktop purposes

You are such a retard. Kill yourself

t. assmad because he knows the retard who said gnu/linux is more primitive than windows in every way is right and the only thing he's wrong about is when he implied this is a bad thing

Learn to use that meme before you continue to embarrass yourself redditor

More bloat != less primitive

>that meme
there wasn't even a meme in that post brainlet

Damn. You are one dumb motherfucker

t. butthurt winfag

Attached: somethinghappened_background.png (732x533, 465K)

I mean, what distro are we talking? Ubuntu is slow as fuck compared to windows.

Don't make me laugh. Yeah Ubuntu is slow as fuck, but not compared to Windows.

My wife megumin is so cute.

Attached: 1566874078540.png (243x207, 7K)

Attached: my_wife.jpg (1200x948, 153K)

because windoze uses c#

As the poster of (You), I should mention I really like MS-DOS. What it does do, it's really good at.
But as a daily OS? No way.

True but Intel ME gives it to the (((NSA))) and AMD PSP to the chinks.

Attached: images.jpg (225x224, 8K)

Big software companies have zero financial incentive to fix bugs or optimize software.
NEETs with unlimited free time, do however.

The state of fucking linuxcels

We prefer the term linuxsexuals.

We'd probably be more tolerant if you just wanted to fuck flightless birds.

>At this rate, it'll probably be a Linux distro anyway.
god i wish this would happen. Not only would it be fucking hilarious and BTFO windows shills, but it would also make software across platforms a non-issue

Can make it boot in under 1 second, given you ignore post. But hey, it's just snfs complaining their setup isn't just like them

It's of course, never going to happen.
I've been meaning to ask - why have freetards hung onto this fantasy for the last 20 years or so?
Is it pure magical thinking, or is there some sort of logic involved?

she's 17 now

t. gnome user

Attached: 1568188720386.jpg (550x550, 59K)

Depends for what.

Attached: attentiongrabbingimage.jpg (979x1099, 151K)

Because it's made to be used.
Windows is deliberately made to sell more powerful hardware.
Judt think back about Vista where initially it was supposed to run fine at 128mb RAM, but they "made" it run with a minimum of 512mb RAM.
>Less bloat
>FOSS
>Better Kernel
Need I say more?

It isn't, really it depends only pn what hardware you use desu senpai

If it's faster on old hardware it's faster on new too

Faster at what?

Does she age in the manga

This is the worst news I've heard all day.

Because it doesnt come with malware preinstalled.