1.1.1.1 vs 9.9.9.9

176.103.130.130

Russian Botnet

dns.adguard.com

uhh I tried this and it doesn't work?

why do people use ublock origin instead of this?

9.9.9.9 is slightly slower, but fuck the Cloudflare botnet

TONS of ads anymore is served locally from the website host or by directly addressing IPs, DNS blocking can't deal with any of those.
And ublock dosn't just block ads either, it also blocks local scripts and other nasties
Simple DNS blocking is works for some things but leave tons of cracks open still, should only ever be relied on if there is no other option (can't install proper blocking software, etc)

Neither. Learn self-hosted DoT/DoH with Unbound/Nginx:
dnsprivacy.at/
github.com/m13253/dns-over-https

ISP one...
the fastest

they censor so much websites Including Jow Forums so hat to pick?

Better that than American botnet.

1.4.8.8

t ozlandian

>Quad9 does generate and share high level anonymized aggregate statistics, including metrics on threat type, geolocation, and if available, sector, as well as other vertical metrics including performance on Quad9 (i.e. number of threats blocked, infrastructure uptime) when available with the public and our threat intelligence partners.
>We share anonymized data on specific domains (such as domain, timestamp, geolocation, number of hits, first seen, last seen) with our threat intelligence partners. Please note that this information does not contain source IP information or any other identifier that would directly identify the end user or their organization.

s-sure thing.

so what to pick??

>Who is better?
my dick in yo ass

216.155.73.40

I use cloudflared on a pihole for DNS over HTTPS so I'm currently using 1.1.1.1. If 9.9.9.9 had a similar program, I'd be using them instead

pick what you like.
Firefox + Cloudflare DNS over HTTPS (Options > Network Settings at bottom of that page > Choose DNS over HTTPS) works pretty good.
Go for 1.1.1.1 if you want systemwide and trust cloudflare.

if you don't use random DNS origin from country that's not related to yours.

>pick what you like.
suggestions?
>trust cloudflare.
no i dont

securedns.eu/
is pretty good one.

Try building your own on a cheap VPS like suggested.

If you want a list of stuff, github.com/curl/curl/wiki/DNS-over-HTTPS has nice list.

*list of servers

between DoH or DoT which is better for security and against MITM??

I'm not the expert on this but they are the same, just that they use different port. Use DoH, Regular HTTPs connection is pretty secure for MITM attacks (from what I know, so far).

This. Google already tracks you everywhere anyway.

what about DoT??

Attached: 1507309762404.gif (2000x1153, 365K)

9.9.9.9 has ties to the city of london police, stay clear!

They are the same, but it is far harder to block DoH since it would basically mean no https either due to the shared port.

thanks user

Hope you're enjoying the easy (You)s.
;^)

Attached: JellyJew.jpg (280x180, 11K)

lol u just gave your private keys to the nsa FOR FREE

Based and self sufficiency pilled.

Quad9 is a collaboration between IBM, PCH, the NYC District Attorney's office, the City of London Police and Christ only knows who else.
I unironically recommend Google or CloudFlare instead of whatever unholy data gathering botnet this is.

>9.9.9.9
is this some cloudflare + google double botnet?

i use opendns. is there a bettr one?

DoT and DoH are fairly similar in all around objective security though DoT is harder to differentiate from web traffic, so I prefer it.

OPEN DNS

208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220

cloudflare, google and 4X9 can glow the fuck off

9.9.9.9. It's 9x more.