ORDER! ORDER!
This is the Vim vs Emacs vote.
The question proposed to the parliament of Jow Forums is:
"Is Emacs a better editor than Vim?"
Responses come in the form of "ayes" or "noes".
If you agree with the question proposed, say "aye" in this thread. If you disagree say "noe"
Ayes to the right. Noes to the left.
This vote ends at 19:00 GMT
ORDER! ORDER!
NOE
but i don't want to talk about eyes and the nose
noeses
AYE
Will the Right Honorable member please remove his member from my wife
NOOOOEEEE
brits are a dying race
Aye
Noe. Vi is the true UNIX text editor. Emacs wants to be its own operating system.
vi is better because there's virtually always vi even in containers. Everyone uses Atom or Visual Studio or Eclipse now. Emacs is as irrelevant as perl.
noe
NANO IS BETTER!!!
noe
noe
NOE
I'd say yes
noe
noe
ai
Nano or bust
AYE
Use Sam faggots.
just like americans
Noe
Noe, nigger
Noe!
AYE
aye
aye
AYE
aye!
Noe
NOE
noe
noe
aye
AYE
ORDER ORDAAAAAR!
Please rise.
The ayes to the right :11
The noes to the left: 16
The noes have it. The noes have it. Emacs is a better editor than Vim.
Fuck you I'll demand new elections because you voted wrong
>is emacs better than vim
>noe
>the noes have it
>emacs is better than vim
WUT
>vote ends at 19 GMT
>calls it at 18:06 GMT
18:06 would be correct, since obviously faggot OP doesn't realise that we're on BST, but they obviously meant 19:06
The absolute state of British politics.
BIG NOE
aye