Calculated IQ's of each board

Attached: .png (1920x984, 38K)

Where is [s4s]?

>I'm an outlier
>therefore the whole chart is wrong
If this isn't bait I have bad news for you user

>biz there

Attached: 1556222169295.gif (480x270, 1.67M)

Jow Forums might have more people with degrees, but we have a lot more children on phones.

This looks a lot more accurate than OP.

Jow Forums that high made me laugh but then again

Attached: 1557281828703.jpg (1876x2066, 485K)

Primary browsers, most of the shit threads are drivebys

>IQ
pseudoscience just like this ancient bait pic

>mlp only beat by braindead sauce requesters and cumbrains
lmao

Attached: 1478702849004.png (744x694, 421K)

>c*mbrain
Why isn't this filtered yet? Reddit incels are not welcome here.

>adv
>120
lolno

Attached: when will they learn.jpg (1562x1196, 203K)

>Jow Forums is the smartest users on the site, acting like retards.
They're not acting m8, you missed that train in 2016

why the fuck is /sp/ee so high

names of athletes

agreed lit and sci are some of the dumbest boards of Jow Forums, populated by retards who think they're brainy. There is no way that chart is accurate.

I actually avoid posting science and literature related topics on Jow Forums because I know I won't get worthwhile discussion from those boards. Maybe I'll try the new humanities board sometimes. I wonder if I'm allowed to post /sci/ related content here, I mean astronomy is kinda involves tech right?

average iq on Jow Forums is 65 bro

Jow Forums used to be smart back around when it first opened up and there were regular threads on economic theory and philosophy. The IQ has really dropped a lot since then as more and more normies flooded in and as the old /new/ users dwindled away

>the board names
Should have just inverted the axis and made a horizontal graph.

>lit and sci are some of the dumbest boards of Jow Forums, populated by retards who think they're brainy.
They were alright 5 years ago. Somehow they changed to Jow Forums+/x/ light.

>/toy/ that low
But we are frens.

I like this one better.

Attached: 1567743268223.png (769x612, 167K)

>Jow Forums is higher than Jow Forums
laughing_girls(males).gif

Sci is /x/ tier

no dataset sauce?

Wouldn't surprise me if you were right.

>Have higher education
>Easy half the user base or more are some form of NEET or social parasite
Too kind an analysis.

>Easy half the user base or more are some form of NEET or social parasite
Maybe on Jow Forums.

Jow Forums is probably closer to 40%, but /a/, /v/, /b/, Jow Forums, etc are def in that territory.

Having gone to both for quite a while, /tg/ is much, MUCH smarter than /sci/. The idea that the "smart people hobbies" boards are actually intelligent is outright wrong.
I also refuse to believe that Jow Forums and Jow Forums are more than 3 points apart considering they're basically the same shitshow.

>implying /x/ isnt the most intelligent board
must feel bad being so low IQ
they talk to demons and shit u niggas just glow

low IQ tend to be more obsessed with self image. they simply cant write an anonymous post that stands on its own

Jow Forums is 70% normalfag phoneposter teens
/b/ is 90% teens and is irrelevant
Most people on /a/ and /v/ seem to be socially awkward but relatively functional
Jow Forums seems to be mostly below average iq adults

>/b/
>negligible
lol.

IQ doesn't mean much. High IQ people do just as much stupid as everyone else. After all, genius is just a polite term for idiot/savant.

>acting

Higher education doesn't mean what it used to, they lowered the standards because retards were willing to pay $50k+ to get degrees no matter how useful the degree actually was because they all fell for the "everyone should go to college" meme.
That being said posters on this site are definitely on the right side of the bell curve, and anyone who believes otherwise has not interacted enough with the left side of the bell curve to realize what stupidity actually is. People who pretend to be retarded can't hold a candle to the real thing.

notice how this is always reposted and there's never any actual data given, just claimed results

stop falling for the same troll over and over

>Weishaupt's plateu
All that comes up are links discussing this image its obviously nonsense
Idiot really does not mean savant, but they are often phrased together because a savant may well often appear clumsy or disassociated, probably because they arnt normal people.

Universities discovered how to leech off of young naive niggers with life long student loans, that's why they lowered the bar and pamper the idiots with safe spaces, maximizing profitability.

>bothering to rate porn image boards

I call bullshit.
You see, people of 4chin come to shitpost here, simply because they want to say things they can't say it IRL (or it is socially challenged to do so), so they come here to release or discharge such emotion, while the rest of the day, that individual could be a business owner, engineer, pharmaceutical, etc. So assuming the test criteria is scientifically proven, it would be still biased as it's like measuring someone IQ while he's pissed and ranting about something before he'll go to bed, additionally, it may even counted the summer months.
Now regarding the results in OP, I don't see any data sources or how it was conducted, so I would 90% assume that its basis is the average vocabulary or terminology used per post, and how coherent the paragraph is and maybe even the words count as well, that's why boards like /lit/, /out/ are amongst the top while image-based posts like /co/, /c/ or even Jow Forums labeled as low IQ. Basically, to get higher "IQ results" as per OP is to argue more with walltext shitposting.

i mostly browse Jow Forums, /lit/ and /sci/
i wonder what that says about my IQ

if that was the methodology it wouldn't make much sense for /wg/ to be so high

it also doesn't make sense for /f/ to be so close to the average since they pretty much have no discussion there - (still a pretty cool board though)

I'm thinking this is all arbitrary and made up

the two most notorious boards /b/ and Jow Forums have a good mix of very smart and very dumb people, just because they have so many users.

You could go to one thread with meaningful and insightful posts and go to another filled with derp

Not much, I'd say. But your post does tell a lot about your vanity.