Open:webglsamples.org /aquarium /aquarium.html
Set fish size to: 1000
Upload your screenshot here to show your FPS!
Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-13 WebGL Aquarium.png (917x403, 1.03M)
September 13, 2019 - 16:11
1000 is no challenge at all. Let's do 10k.
Attached: file.png (1211x913, 2.96M)
September 13, 2019 - 16:13
>500 set it to 1000, then talk
September 13, 2019 - 16:18
sorry, i'm retarded and posted the wrong cap. i did try 1000 and i still got 144fps locked.
Attached: file.png (197x354, 155K)
September 13, 2019 - 16:19
Attached: bite me.jpg (1903x973, 346K)
September 13, 2019 - 16:24
let's try 10,000
here's mine.
Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-13 WebGL Aquarium(1).png (917x403, 1.07M)
September 13, 2019 - 16:25
September 13, 2019 - 16:26
September 13, 2019 - 16:28
September 13, 2019 - 16:39
September 13, 2019 - 16:41
Meh
Attached: __.png (1748x708, 2.52M)
September 13, 2019 - 16:41
September 13, 2019 - 16:55
Damn phones are useless At least it can get 60fps in 1000 ;-;
Attached: 1568393724037.jpg (1080x1668, 1.3M)
September 13, 2019 - 16:56
September 13, 2019 - 17:02
September 13, 2019 - 17:04
Rx 580 with amdgpu drivers.
Attached: Screenshot at 2019-09-13 19-03-16.png (1585x1304, 2.89M)
September 13, 2019 - 17:05
What a shitty fucking benchmark.
Attached: 121314.png (2334x1226, 1.49M)
September 13, 2019 - 17:06
Wtf Someone explain
Attached: 1568394447160.jpg (1080x1605, 1.23M)
September 13, 2019 - 17:07
This desu. If you can't be bothered to use up to 100% of the GPU for your shitty test, it isn't a real benchmark.
September 13, 2019 - 17:09
Is chromium better in webgl performance?
September 13, 2019 - 17:10
This isn't a GPU benchmark. It's rather a browser benchmark, showing how better it implements. eg. chrome vs firefox
September 13, 2019 - 17:12
Attached: fishie.png (153x338, 86K)
September 13, 2019 - 17:14
>PooMD Found your problem!
Attached: ___.jpg (1455x833, 375K)
September 13, 2019 - 17:14
What's the point of setting to 1000? With 1000 I get locked 60 FPS (it works up to refresh rate) on a fuckin' Intel HD 4000. Is your computer made out of wood to get 30 FPS?
September 13, 2019 - 17:15
Attached: 2019-09-13 13_16_00.jpg (2562x1369, 948K)
September 13, 2019 - 17:17
September 13, 2019 - 17:18
I am getting 5x performance of this benchmark in chromium compared to firefox
September 13, 2019 - 17:18
I get basically the same fps with a 1660Ti
Attached: 2019-09-13 13_18_01.jpg (2559x1366, 1.09M)
September 13, 2019 - 17:19
did you try like this, user did?
September 13, 2019 - 17:22
September 13, 2019 - 17:22
September 13, 2019 - 17:22
Absolutely based. Guess I don’t have to test since user already did.
September 13, 2019 - 17:23
G6430
Attached: Screenshot_20190913-202025.jpg (1080x1920, 1.5M)
September 13, 2019 - 17:24
>1080Ti >33 fps >1660Ti >49 fps kek, 1080ti btfo.
September 13, 2019 - 17:24
>use this shitty botnet to enjoy shitty games and bloated content I'm good, thanks.
September 13, 2019 - 17:40
September 13, 2019 - 18:09
Attached: bretty ok.jpg (1920x937, 497K)
September 13, 2019 - 18:15
firefox is better than chrome
Attached: browser.jpg (1920x1046, 900K)
September 13, 2019 - 18:35
Quadro m@ster race
Attached: Capture.png (231x446, 185K)
September 13, 2019 - 18:42
EZ
Attached: Screenshot (75).png (1600x900, 2.64M)
September 13, 2019 - 18:53
September 13, 2019 - 19:33
Attached: 60 nigger.png (1920x847, 2.54M)
September 13, 2019 - 19:35
palemoon also works well, pic related in on an rx 580 with a 1440p 144hz monitor
September 13, 2019 - 20:21
It's not at all for me.
1660Ti, I get 49fps with 30,000 fish in chrome. With firefox I get 24fps with the same 30,000.
Same monitor, same window size.
September 13, 2019 - 20:24
R5 2600 + RTX 2060
Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-13 WebGL Aquarium.jpg (1920x916, 768K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:26
forgot pic
Attached: 2019-09-13-162025_2560x1440_scrot.jpg (2560x1440, 418K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:26
Same PC, both tested on Firefox I guess I'll have to download Chrome to test now
Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-13 WebGL Aquarium(1).jpg (1920x916, 763K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:30
In my defense, it's using my iGPU instead of my dGPU
Attached: fish ai.png (1918x961, 3.67M)
September 13, 2019 - 20:31
My computer does not appear to support webgl.
September 13, 2019 - 20:32
what do i win?
Attached: Screenshot_20190913_153126.jpg (1683x1017, 394K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:32
September 13, 2019 - 20:35
And now with Chrome. Worth noting I had vsync set for Firefox
Attached: chrome.png (962x505, 942K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:35
Weird, must be single core CPU based or something, cause I have a worse GPU, but get much better performance.
Or just favors intel I guess?
Cause I'm running a 9700k and 1660Ti
Attached: 2019-09-13 16_36_59.png (809x818, 1.43M)
September 13, 2019 - 20:38
>must be single core CPU based or something Quite likely, I'll see if some /pcbg/ Ryzen 3000 owners will pop in
September 13, 2019 - 20:41
FISH WALL FISH WALL FISH WALL
Attached: FISH WAAAAAAAAAAAAL.png (1740x895, 2.94M)
September 13, 2019 - 20:45
3700x
Attached: Screenshot_20190913_155005.jpg (1683x1017, 440K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:50
What's your graphics card though? and what browser?
September 13, 2019 - 20:52
gtx1060, waterfox, on linux
Attached: Screenshot_20190913_155155.jpg (1683x1017, 373K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:52
September 13, 2019 - 20:53
That's pretty terrible performance... wonder if it's because of linux, waterfox, or the CPU...
September 13, 2019 - 20:53
1000 sits at 60 FPS. 10k also sits at 60 FPS. 30K is is the only usable measurement.
Attached: Annotation 2019-09-13 135331.png (1920x1095, 3.69M)
September 13, 2019 - 20:56
>09/13/19(Fri)11:11:11 Neat.
Attached: 1360x768_120KB-5934_poop-nq8.png (1440x848, 35K)
September 13, 2019 - 20:58
is this supposed to be a challenge?
Attached: step_up_your_game_AMDFAGS.png (521x843, 965K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:05
No, needle dick, it isn't.
September 13, 2019 - 21:06
specs?
Attached: 2019-09-13 17_06_49.png (293x400, 316K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:07
Thanks!
Also, Numix is my fav.
September 13, 2019 - 21:07
nice site
Attached: Capture.png (1904x395, 4K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:07
You need to enable WebGL first, user!
September 13, 2019 - 21:08
8700k 2080ti
Looks to be cpu bound.
September 13, 2019 - 21:09
September 13, 2019 - 21:10
Yeah for sure 9700k here with a significantly worse GPU.
Attached: 2019-09-13 17_10_34.png (261x380, 252K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:11
What's it like being worse than a mac
Attached: Screen Shot 2019-09-13 at 4.10.51 PM.png (1204x602, 708K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:12
>mayo sandwich I'll stay mad if you keep asking stupid questions, butt breath.
September 13, 2019 - 21:14
iPad is bretty gud
Attached: 54B692B8-7700-4931-82DA-46764921E7E7.jpg (509x910, 164K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:17
September 13, 2019 - 21:18
i7-7700 GTX 1080
Attached: fish.png (1249x897, 3.12M)
September 13, 2019 - 21:19
Even my two year old android phone gets 60fps at only 1000 fish.
Attached: SmartSelect_20190913-171937_Samsung Internet.jpg (1083x1883, 1.21M)
September 13, 2019 - 21:20
September 13, 2019 - 21:22
September 13, 2019 - 21:24
September 13, 2019 - 21:25
My iPhone beats my GTX 1060
September 13, 2019 - 21:40
Wow! Mind sharing your CPU worth? (Building price)
Attached: tenor.gif (350x254, 1.56M)
September 13, 2019 - 21:41
>1080Ti you just got rekt by a $300 card
Attached: JXaTOqA.jpg (2560x1297, 766K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:45
September 13, 2019 - 21:45
vega 56 and 2700x. 30000 is the only thing that goes below 60fps
Attached: fishies.jpg (3837x2159, 1.94M)
September 13, 2019 - 21:46
this guyits a slightly OC;d 1700x this is a stupid fucking benchmark since it stresses nothing and is dependent on a very specific technology and its compatibility with certain web browsers
September 13, 2019 - 21:47
33 seems kinda weak for a 1080TI Here is my 1080 TI 40fps
Attached: 1545375090962.png (1148x824, 2.31M)
September 13, 2019 - 21:48
and actually it's software rendering anyways so whatever
September 13, 2019 - 21:48
here's chromium, but i get all kinds of artifacts
Attached: Screenshot_20190913_165033.jpg (1683x1017, 462K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:51
He was already beat by me with a $260 card.
September 13, 2019 - 21:53
Yep, I know that it's very unreliable, just like the guy said.
September 13, 2019 - 21:53
fixed with some chrome flags
Attached: Screenshot_20190913_165850.jpg (1683x1017, 499K)
September 13, 2019 - 21:58
>It's rather a browser benchmark, showing how better it implements. eg. chrome vs firefox Out of MS Edge, MS Edge chromium, Vivaldi, Firefox, stock chrome, and chromium MS Edge chromium was the fastest, with stock chrome coming second and Chromium was 3rd
September 13, 2019 - 22:00
Attached: 1546097889540.jpg (1921x951, 620K)
September 13, 2019 - 22:02
30k
Attached: 1568113293633.jpg (1919x951, 697K)
September 13, 2019 - 22:06
Attached: fish.jpg (1920x1080, 671K)
September 14, 2019 - 00:05
Attached: fish2.jpg (1920x1080, 736K)
September 14, 2019 - 00:07
fluctuating a lot between 20-30, mostly low 20s A5 2016
Attached: Screenshot_20190914-031523.png (1080x1920, 2.56M)
September 14, 2019 - 00:17
FK YOU ALL
Attached: laptop2.jpg (485x321, 29K)
September 14, 2019 - 00:20
Javascript was a mistake. I can't believe we just let developers run their unaudited code on our machines without even a second thought. That site makes my fucking fan loud.
September 14, 2019 - 00:33