OH NONONO

Attached: umad.png (486x174, 6K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cpubenchmark.net/compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-vs-Intel-i7-7700K/2966vs2874
cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD Ryzen 7 1700X&id=2969
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Bwahahahaha excellent necromancy user
the internet never forgets

based screencap poster

Was he right?

Attached: based.png (768x232, 45K)

Welp, now there's a post that didn't age well.

aged as well as Intel's 10nm process node

Attached: 1537761053066_0.gif (538x572, 338K)

Not really.
cpubenchmark.net/compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-vs-Intel-i7-7700K/2966vs2874

Zen did flop, and only the current gen is decent. Marketing carried amd like usual.

1800x was $500, and had issues.

>Zen did flop, and only the current gen is decent. Marketing carried amd like usual.

Attached: 1491958654249.png (653x726, 84K)

>Zen did flop
nigga you waht

>cpu score 15534
Are you okay retard?

15534 isn't around 13000

Original Zen did flop. Sales were mediocre until current gen, and the original died at gaming even the $500+ CPU.

cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD Ryzen 7 1700X&id=2969

Link single core, and all the "outliers" that were banned for public benchmarking by amd. The benchmarks that got you blacklisted by amd if published.

Ryzen 2000 was already outselling Intel. Ryzen 3000 fucking buried Intel 1488 feet underground.

Attached: 1567286454849.png (1800x850, 229K)

single thread is in that link

Attached: 1int.png (303x311, 178K)

>The same german shill image.
They couldn't even get Intel products to sell.

Ah so you understand that it was lower.

>1488
Still not convinced that you're not a chink though.

yes. why is this some massive surprise to you? they offered twice the cores, something had to give

>Twice the latency
>Twice the problems
>Twice the excuses
Partnering up with chinkshills is what saved that mess. Imagine if the chinks didn't report, and threaten to kill everyone that posted the wrong benchmark online.

For every AMD problem you struggle find Intel has 6 gorillion more.

Attached: 1489160516428.png (800x612, 245K)

Still not convinced you aren't a coping retard.

Post time-stamped USD when making consumer electronics threads.
$30.27

>1800x stopped being marketed as a killer gaming CPU after launch
Post time-stamped USD faggot.

Are you even in the US?

Eurochad, my mutt user.

>Yuropoor
Then you're retarded opinion doesn't matter. Post some clown cash though for proof.

Cope and seethe

56%

>your

>Cope and seethe
No cash time-stamped. I guess that we're done here, Chang.

Post your nose.

Post yours, and your cash.

Itt shills that can't even afford what they're shilling.

ITT: coping and seething

Also twice the performance

thanks for the ant picture

>twice the multicore performance for almost twice the price
>still shit single core
And you're here pretending that you had enough money during launch to purchase it, and admitting that you were such a retard that you succumbed that hard to chunk marketing.
Post monies btw.

AMDfags can't post monies.

Attached: 1527483532499.png (1024x691, 213K)

debatable

You want me to post euros or what? Dumbass. Post your nose.

Don't worry bro, maybe Intel 10nm+++ will finally beat AMD.

Attached: Ryzen-3900X-3700X-review-Rainbow-Six-Siege.png (1800x1200, 85K)

Quad core? What do you need dual core for?