What went wrong?

What went wrong?
archive.fo/d4vDM
thedailybeast.com/famed-mit-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-defends-epstein-victims-were-entirely-willing

Attached: 1568548054087.jpg (1080x2046, 777K)

Other urls found in this thread:

assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6405929/09132019142056-0001.pdf
vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-described-epstein-victims-as-entirely-willing
stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#14_September_2019_(Statements_about_Epstein)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

twisting someone else's words to fit your point

Well, I'm not surprized, free software was created so that pedophiles could use software that didn't have tracking to share child pornography.

and proprietary software was created so Bill Gates could hide his CP and blame it on everyone else

Media lying as usual.

Attached: 1568539693325.jpg (2691x1359, 450K)

>What went wrong?
organised harassment by journalists and twitter verified nobodies.. they don't like it when people aren't mindless sheep. for a university to leak the emails out, it's concerning that freedom of speech in the united states is well and truly dead. we're now in a world dealing with fascists that reach to the top of education systems. don't do what the fascists say? we're going to write lots of mean and bullshit stories and tweet furiously to other intellectual bankrupts.

>What went wrong?
and who the fuck is leaked the mail and publish it?

> free software was created so that pedophiles could use software that didn't have tracking to share child pornography
lmao. 0/10 bait.

That's just damage control. He 100% knew what he was talking about.

It's not the first time feminists and radicals have tried to remove Stallman.

>That's just damage control. He 100% knew what he was talking about.
hello feminist cancer. get back to your communist club, rekt roastie.

yikes. Have sex incel.

>no no noooooo thats not possible stallman cant be a pedo enabler REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>It's not the first time feminists and radicals have tried to remove Stallman.
rms isn't going anywhere.
> incel
> a term invented by a woman, and used by women, to describe her involuntary celibacy
how is this supposed to work against men exactly? lmao. roasties really are this fucking retarded.

Here's your RMS Witch-hunt info pack:

The original leaked mailing list thread with his actual words:
assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6405929/09132019142056-0001.pdf

The mailing list thread first appeared attached to the original fake news article at vice:
vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-described-epstein-victims-as-entirely-willing

Stallman's response:
stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#14_September_2019_(Statements_about_Epstein)
>I want to respond to the misleading media coverage of messages I posted about Marvin Minsky's association with Jeffrey Epstein. The coverage totally mischaracterised my statements.
>Headlines say that I defended Epstein. Nothing could be further from the truth. I've called him a "serial rapist", and said he deserved to be imprisoned. But many people now believe I defended him — and other inaccurate claims — and feel a real hurt because of what they believe I said.
>I'm sorry for that hurt. I wish I could have prevented the misunderstanding.

I'm not surprised either, just look at his face.

> The law would also prohibit "encouraging a (so-called) child to take part in sexual activity." I think that everyone age 14 or above ought to take part in sex, though not indiscriminately. (Some people are ready earlier.) It is unnatural for humans to abstain from sex past puberty, and while I wouldn't try to pressure anyone to participate, I certainly encourage everyone to do so.

Physiognomy is real folks. How anyone can look at this disgusting unkempt fatty and not immediately assume he's a bigtime pedo is beyond me. How much do you wanna bet that he went to the island just like Hawking.

Attached: gross.jpg (480x360, 103K)

stallman is a pedophile
case closed

Why are boomer Jewish men so interested in pedophilia?

SJWDot hasn't removed it yet?

He voiced his opinion around the age of consent in the context of the Epstein scandal, pretty poor timing for that

he is a pedo and always will be

You must be actually stupid to believe things without any evidence.

>he is a pedo and always will be
Didn't say he wasn't, most people wouldn't have a strong opinion on the age of consent otherwise

>he is a pedo
why?

thanks for the (You)s guys

That would be a good grave stone wisdom for social media.

This.
I was never even looking for that connection, it's just something that is impossible to miss when dealing with the linux community long enough.
Pedo's, like other sexual deviants (think furries or even regular sex starved teenagers) cannot keep quiet about their desires. They will post pictures of kids in suggestive poses, anime or real, making jokes that are barely jokes anymore, or blatantly talking about it and defending it.
The amount of this you'll find in linux oriented places is significantly higher than anywhere else. And I'm not talking about the typical scientific 5% significant, but more like 500%.

unfortunately none of that is illegal in the US
t. works in law enforcement

Or extremely intelligent. Think about it.

Maybe he was abused, that can turn people into pedophiles like Stallman is. Then more people finding out the truth and him and his pedofreetard cult running damage control.

Linux was a mistake

>I believe everything I read on the internet even without any evidence!
Yhea doesn't sound that intelligent now does it.

Linux-libre fixed that

>What went wrong?
he's jewish

Attached: not good.png (500x364, 257K)

I'm afraid Jow Forums is siding with the jew against trannies on this one, you have to go back

he's a self-hating anti-zionist jew at least

He's also right on a ton of things even when his thinking comes from marxist side, you can have Jow Forumssters agree with goc fucking with monopolies like goog even if way to reach that conclusion is entirely different, he's still based

normies unable to intepret language
or context

/thread

>Stallman also wrote in the email exchange that “it is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.”

But Stallmann is correct. The concept of statutory rape is completely absurd, if anything it should simply be called "sexual relationship with a minor". Also, like so many other things in the US, the age of consent is just fucking retarded. Not only can you drive as a 16 year old, but you can be tried as an adult at fucking 12 years old, meaning that but if you happened to take a photo of your 12 year old self you can be tried (as an adult) for creating and possessing child pornography.