People who don't understand the forth programming language just aren't smart

Now you're just telling me lies.

Attached: 1568563054188.png (320x512, 279K)

I didn't say it was true, I said what if. Your inability to argue against the plausibility of that hypothetical weakens your case.

If you didn't write your own threaded interpreter you don't understand Forth.

I don't think you have the academic credentials to say what you're saying, because by your own admission you don't understand forth.

Hello, I was just passing by when I noticed you being incredibly stupid. Please leave.

>If your IQ was already at that level you'd already understand what is so good about forth and constantly be rewriting your own forth.
>constantly be rewriting your own forth
Instead of actually achieving tangible goals? Sounds like you just get the same level of autism as Lisp without any of the community.
Also, what does it even mean for me to write "my own" forth? Why shouldn't I just use someone else's interpreter/compiler? If I wanted a language that customised like fuck just for my needs, I'd write myself a personalised Lisp library with everything I could ever want. Is it worth spending my time to achieve something that someone else has already done, and probably better than I could?

>sounds like you'd just get the same level of autism as lisp

Sounds accurate to me I don't see what you're getting at.

>Why shouldn't I just use someone elses [forth]

Why shouldn't you just jack another mans dick off instead of jacking your own dick?

>Why shouldn't you just jack another man's dick off instead of jacking your own dick?
So you're telling me that writing my own forth interpreter has the same level of personal connection as jacking myself off?
You're gonna need some evidence behind those bold claims.

You can verify this yourself by writing your own forth.

Sounds like a lot of time spent trying to verify something that may not even be true, when I could instead spend that time learning other things.
Again, what reason do I have to believe your claims? Surely you can show me something you've done in forth yourself that would show off the benefits of writing one's own interpreter.

You can verify this yourself by writing your own forth.

Have I reached the end of your script, user? You can admit you have no idea what you're talking about, no need to be ashamed.

This is you and your lower IQ. You can't grasp the thing you're looking at. I think you need to go back to Jow Forums

Attached: 1566340882083.jpg (494x500, 133K)

You can verify this yourself by writing your own forth.

Eh, if that really is the case then I'd rather use the tools that work for my low IQ instead of trying fruitlessly to grasp things beyond myself. All the languages I know already do everything I want them to, what more do I need?
I would still like to see some evidence of forth leading a man to enlightenment like you and the other user claim, but I guess nobody has it. Or would it be beyond my grasp too?

You can verify this yourself by writing your own forth.

Eh, I still haven't mastered the first three.

they made a fourth one? I only know the two

kek
>new dialect of forth comes out
>"fith"

Yeah you should just use python my dude. It would work out better for you.

Already am, along with several other languages.
I sense some sarcasm from your post, is there some reason why I should stop using it?

You'd only want to stop using things like python and java if you wanted to increase your IQ. I suggest you move up to c# before you try something as hard as lisp or forth.

Forth is incredibly easy to learn and use. Are there really people who don’t understand it?

Isn't high level programming languages for brainlets?

Yes there are women, nonwhites, and the mentally retarded.

I can at least see the merit in Lisp in its ability to treat code as data and vice versa, and write macros that let you pretty much create specialised languages out of it. I'm sure there are merits to using forth and creating a specialised version of it but I haven't found them, nor does anyone seem to have any evidence of why you'd wanna do that. Oh well.

Why write FORTH when ASM is faster?

They are.
OP is a brainlet.

forth is just smol lisp

Attached: 20131223-135146.jpg (143x190, 7K)

but assembly is smaller

Assembly is not lispy though so fuck your couch.

>You can verify this yourself by writing your own forth.

Lisp sucks.
Assembly rocks.
You can verify this yourself buy writing your own chip in VHDL or Verilog.

Well who is silly enough to let those little cupcakes near a computer anyway? LOL

green arrays chips is far superior to a field programmable gate array

lawyers

FORTH is just assembly.

weird flex but ok

nope. forth is a macro assembler.

Just looked at the wikipedia page. This shit is wack, kind of cool but not sure what hte point is

The FORTH interpreter binary is just assembly, so in the end you're just writing assembly in a different form.

That's like saying google chrome is assembly.

have sex

It is.
Everything is assembly.
But writing raw AMD64 assembly on Linux to make static executables is a very based and accessible kind of assembly.

You can argue that all programs are assembly if you want but that does not mean all programs are equally good efficient or useful. Reddit and Jow Forums by your definition are both assembly. That does not make Reddit equal to Jow Forums.

It's the other way around you bucko haven't you seen the diagram?
#include
#include

using namespace std;

int main()
{

string meme;

cout

Attached: 1508091479357.jpg (570x587, 43K)

The closer to pure assembly the program is written in the more based and ascended the programmer who has written it is.

That's not actually true. The closer to forth you are the more based and ascended you are. But since forth is so close to assembler they get the two confused.

I'm sorry to inform you that you're the one confused here, because computers run on assembly and not on FORTH.
If FORTH was so based the computers would run on it, but they run on assembly instead, because assembly is more based.

computers run on uOPs actually.

If I was confused then why is my IQ higher? That's a contradiction.

uOPs are just different kind of assembly
Your IQ is written in assembly, which contradicts your contradiction thus destroying both contradictions and confirming the supremacy of assembly.

My IQ is written in an analog neural network of biological cells. There is no Instruction Set Architecture to the human brain.

I'm afraid you've proven yourself to be low IQ, because the computer that runs the universe is clearly written in scheme lisp.

Attached: idjfosidjfosijfsoifdj.jpg (558x744, 90K)

But then that means that scheme lisp is the best language and that contradicts both of us which lowers our IQ back to zero!
Sir, please retract your statement immediately.

Who needs an ISA when you can just stick wires wherever you need them to go?
How's it feel to have an IQ below 40% copper?

No forth is the best language.

It seems I have won the debate once again.

Attached: 1568575991041.jpg (432x504, 293K)