>this. why i went with a 9900k. i don't trust amd at all. to many lies, over hype, and under delivering
replace amd with intel
AMD caught cheating
>amd tards so butthurt in damage control they ad hominem youtubers
So what? Anonymous imageboards exist for the reason of arguments, not personal biases. You're literally going full redditor here attacking the person not their (valid) argument.
How many of you faggots actually read about architecture of a processor or technology required to make things work and how many get educated about subject on youtube?
Just wondering cause /g seem to be in such miserable state it's almost like as if I'm talking to my grandma about PCs
>AMD caught cheating...
now we need to catch Intel playing fair
Laura Rain or something like that
>lackluster all core boosts
You're really not missing much from that 100Mhz, extra 1.7%
I was hoping for some new speculative flaw, but AMD. Instead I got some cucked bullshit about a thing that barely matters. Anyone who can plot can see performance per MHz is like a logarithmic curve.
>Actual cuck
Opinion dismissed.
100Mhz is far more than 1.7%.
Even assuming a 5Ghz clocked CPU, 100Mhz is 5%. And AMD doesn't clock anywhere close to 5Ghz as it is, so 100Mhz makes up an even larger percentage than that.
I though this image was shopped for the dramatic effect but it's his actual forehead wtf.