Oh no no no time for a new sticky

oh no no no time for a new sticky

Attached: Screenshot (17).png (605x548, 267K)

>he doesn't believe Jeffrey Epstein did anything wrong
hahahah fuck

He's a liberal, of course he thinks pedophilia is acceptable

>legalizing pedophilia
A truly Jow Forumsack.

go say that on Jow Forums and see how Jow Forums support pedophiles

Its split roughly half like always
The old thinly veiled loli lolbert threads were also roughly split down the middle too

Attached: Retia.Adolf.full.763238.jpg (650x919, 454K)

Left eating itself

I mean maybe, but publicly endorsing pedophilia is a bad move no matter which side of the aisle you're on

All those people participating in this witch hunt should go to jail for this.

Didn't read the picture. I'll hide this thread. Just want to say that it's bad to give the OP troll attention. He might not go away if he doesn't get replies. But the fewer replies he gets the fewer posts he writes on Jow Forums

Go back to the_donald, cuck.

On which planet is calling somebody a serial-rapist construed as "defending them"?

>16 year old girl
>pedophilia
if you're in puberty you're not a child.

name one thing jeffrey epstein did wrong

Going balls deep into a 14yo isn't pedophilia you inbred retards.

Attached: ahwg.gif (417x264, 1.94M)

>Going balls deep into a 14yo isn't pedophilia you inbred retards
>arguing the semantics of having sex with children
>calling anyone else an inbred retard
what did he mean by this?

>a 14 year old is a child who doesn't understand what sex is
cringe
dilate ameritranny

>(((Stallmann)))
>makes his own OS
>pro pedophilia
Somebody get a warrant!

>a 14 year old is a child who doesn't understand what sex is
>someone understands what sex is, they CAN'T be forced, manipulated or coerced into having sex with someone
who hurt you little boy?

Based libtards

Even 11 year olds understand what sex is

How would you know? Did you had intercourse with 11 yo? Have you asked an 11 yo about sex?
CP doesn't count, sweaty

>show he doesn't believe Jeffrey Epstein did anything wrong
What?

Make the new sticky Satania-only, 100% based and future-proof

>Even 11 year olds understand what sex is
ok, but what is your point? if you mean to say that an 11 year old's mind is nearly as developed as even an 18 year old, you're wrong. To imply that an adult and child understand a sexual relationship the same way is pretty stupid. Yea a child might understand what sex IS, but does that justify an adult using it to coerce or manipulate a child's behavior? I'm sure you'd say it does street shitter

not spilling the beans while he still could

Anime is next. It is inherently misogynist and exclusive of women.
>b-but I know lots of girls that like anime!
Internalized misogyny is not consent, sweaty.

So, i believe that teenagers should do that shit with teenagers. and not try it before the age of 12. and also i believe that it should seems weird when an adult say yes to a minor, because it could be a littler abusive...

there are some people who believe it is ok when 25 boy do it with a 16 years old girl, but i believe that it can be ok when a 25 old man do it with 19 years old girl.

who likes my believes?

Attached: smug-pepe2.jpg (400x400, 43K)

Sorry, if you don't support Jow Forums pedophiles then majority won't agree with you.

THIS DUMB FUCK POSTED HIS CELL LMAO

Attached: LOL.png (723x162, 23K)

So what are you gonna do? Call it and yell at him? That'll show him who really is in the right, huh?

it's quarantined, i broke out, now this is my new home

How do I call him and tell at him from Europe?

yeah it’s funny
only peabrains can’t have a laugh
guess that makes you a peabrain

>lmao it'll be funny guise lets harrass this dude haha there are no consequences
Go back to twitter

>he think incel poltards aren't pedos
t. incel poltard

do you know where you are, peabrain?

>peabrain
Shouldn't you use a more offensive and familiar term in order to try and fit in? Didn't they brief you on how important blending in is?

shut up peabrain

>make a skeptical post
>forget about it for decades
>one morning you wake up and realize you were decades long advocating for something

This guy makes it look like his blog is filled with 15 years pro pedophilia coverage because posting "I'm skeptical [...]". What a huge faggot.

Jow Forums is as thick as the rest of the internet. RMS was only arguing the semantic meaning of "assault", and some fat feminist cunt went on a crusade because she was jealous he got given an office at MIT.

>tries to manipulate women like Harvey Weinstein did

Put Terry there, we deserve better than this monster.

Attached: 119745343.png (1144x753, 125K)

>fat feminist cunt
She's not fat, though. Rather cute, in fact.

Mom not only taught him not to believe everything in the news, she also didn't taught him not to post your private info on the internet. What is wrong with todays education?

Do they do it on purpose? Do they know they are blatantly misquoting him?

Of course. There are no reprocussions for their actions. What incentive do they have to do extra legwork in the name of "accuracy" when inflammatory shit like this gets way more clicks anyway?
This is the market economy at work.

Of course. That's the entire point of modern journalism.

why would he, hes not dead they have fucking picture evidence back on his island lmao

So are we gonna persecute people for thought crime now faggots?

Judging by this thread, yes.
Jow Forums has really fallen from grace, huh guys.

Say that to Simone de Beauvoir, the Jesus Christ of the feminists.

RMS has lots of enemies, but I guess in this case, people simply believe the news and repost the fitting-in opinions to get likes, so it's simple mass stupidity, social media.

I support violence against journalists, but only in minecraft

Sounds like you need some reducation, pal

Attached: paddlin.jpg (474x346, 20K)

If we use drugs to force pre-mature puberty on a child, is it okay to fuck them?

Were you living under a rock since early 2015?

Women can't be pedophiles because women do not have the level of social power that men have. A woman cannot rape a child under a partriarchy.

My public school taught me about sex when I was 9 years old. I don't know what shithole state or country you live in but most of the united states has sexual education somewhere in elementary.

Stallmans a retard and never advocated for pedophilia, he suggested that age of consent laws are often retarded (fucking a 17 year old 2 hours before her birthday is a crime) and that studies of the dangers of pedophilia are entirely based around rape victims and thus flawed when commenting on the harm.

What he said was purely autistic but logically right. Hes not saying its okay to fuck kids hes saying you can't have concrete evidence to the harm when its always based around abuse.

Not his fault hes an autist. The woketards in question demanding he be hung literally cheer for those indigenous tribes that rape their children/force young boys to suck their dicks as diverse culture. They're sick people on many many levels.

>people simply believe the news
Stallman likely has a case for libel since the media provably took his comments out of context and fabricated conclusions.

It's honestly kind of baffling, I don't agree with Stallman in that I wouldn't have attempted to make a logistical proof on what constitutes assault in the scenario he was in, but that's exactly what he was doing. Not "defending Epstein", he -explicitly- defames Epstein. I'm at a loss for how one could read from that email chain that Stallman was defending Epstein. The worst you could levy at him is victim blaming, perhaps (and even then he was framing it from the perspective of how Minsky would've potentially interpreted the situation, not that the girls were willing themselves but that Minsky could've reasonably assumed that they were.)
Keep in mind Stallman is most likely autistic and just does not understand when it's contextually / socially acceptable to make such arguments, he just does it. Which in this case worked against him.

Women most definitely have more social power than men in these decadent times.

the same way the windows refund scammers call from India

Sorry, sweaty. Until you can point to an empircal, peer-reviewed study that agrees with you, you're just going to have to take several seats

I texted him but I'm under a range IP ban so I can't share the screen shot
>Why are you doing this? Why do you want to hurt Stallman so badly? Stallman didn't rape anyone and is literally autistic. This witch hunt mentality isn't doing anything besides punishing a right to express ones thoughts and opinions even if they may be ones you disagree with or find distasteful.

Haha

Yes, that's why she would recruit young females so her "husband" could fuck them. She was a pimp.

>stallman
>powerful computer scientist
Kek

He's the "What you're referring to as Linux,
is in fact, GNU/Linux" after all. He has always spoken in a extremely specific and precise manner.

When they do all the privilege math the fact is that being a white male in a position of (power) greatly outweighs his autism.
they will jerk off as they pat themselves on the back for punching up.

if you actually read the mailing list everything he says is somewhat reasonable and nowhere does he actually defend epstein

the articles written about it word chosen excerpts of his message to sound a particular way.

for example, he stated that the victim likely "presented herself as entirely willing", but the vice article says he believed that she was "entirely willing". There's quite a difference between those two things.

NOOO STOP WE HAVE TO SPIN THE NARRATIVE THAT HES A POWERFUL AND OPPRESSIVE WHITE MAN HOLDING ALL THE WOMEN BACK NOT A HIPPY WHO DOESN"T EVEN PROGRAM THESE DAYS

He wrote a fucken compiler unlike you gorilla nigger.

Attached: 1528455561082.png (958x718, 974K)

Are there ever any twitter posts or replies defending Stallman? If not its very telling of the kind of people who use twitter

Linux Torvalds

Its a hit piece by a hysterical woman who just found out this guy even exists.

Yea, the only people who use twitter are the ones perpetually asshurt by white men. They go their to vent since they are too passive aggressive to say anything in real life.

>reading muh biology class about where children come from is same as having sex
You're retarded.

There*

LMAO

Attached: 1548099211932.png (400x400, 242K)

Jow Forums has the absolute worst standards of any board on this site

That user is right tho.
I can't say I'd date her, but would rape/10 definitely.

I'm confused as to what you think sex is other than a biological function.
We even got to see sweet 80s educational porn.

>fucking 15yo is evil
It's legal in so many countries.
>pedophilia
This is not what pedophilia means. Why are Americans so retarded?

Absolutely.

lmao that bitch got a 6head hidden behind those bangs

I bet you're a virgin.

thankfully we don't succumb to twitter mark of david verified basedmale pressure

Because it is

No hilariously I got raped as a kid.

tranny are you ok???

That's hilarious.

>hilariously
Were they dressed as a clown?

stop spreading FUD

Attached: stallman.png (975x241, 55K)

He's an open socialist

okay, liberal

>implying pedo running fsf is somehow a problem
>implying fs written by literal murderer is a problem

Attached: Hans_Reiser_2005.jpg (366x524, 41K)

imagine being so new you didn't know he was doing it for 15 fucking years

A hand full useful idiots within the FSF have wanted to oust Stallman for a while because even though he is in line with 90% of their politics and demands, he is too principled to allow more authoritarian 10% to interfere with the GNU project or hurt it's users, which they see as "problematic". Pressure from corporate puppets backed by a similar set of useful idiots got Linus to cuck to their demands, but RMS is too autistic to bend and so must be destroyed. This has been a long time coming. Also take note that they infiltrated FreeBSD before they made a move on GNU/Linux, just to make sure the number of people jumping ship would be reduced. Granted they have controlled the Linux foundation for a while, but that doesn't grant them enough direct control over what gets included in the kernel, only the ability to apply financial pressures.

And before anyone screeches about Jow Forums and SJWs, the useful idiots in question might spout leftist drivel, but that isn't the point. This is about simple corporate greed and state control. Their PC language and policies are a wolf in sheep's clothing. Just a means for corporate puppets to gain more control over free software, but dressed up like it's in the name of inclusion, equality, fairness, etc. This is done so they can demonize anyone who would speak against any new policies or decisions. Don't confuse your enemy for the mask they wear or the tribal retards who will rally behind anything with the right set of buzz words.

I can no longer tell if this is sarcasm or not

This. We all know what stallmans views have been and they have been very stable for decades, and now suddenly somebody attacks him and everybody is trying to throw him under the boss. I don't give a shit if he says something bad when it has nothing to do with free software