Certain combinations of 1s and 0s can get you arrested

It's not strict liability, dipshit.

Nu4chan literally defends cp criminalization and fights free speech. Youre about 10 years too late here sadly, redditors have taken over.

Fake news, the atoms are all on average the same age.

>defends cp criminalization
Good, pedos get the rope

Reddit fags deserve the rope. Neck yourself

Fuck off Jow Forums go back to thedonald.

>1s and 0s
who?

nigga the only reason people didn't say anything about cp was because they got flamed by a bunch of pedos whenever they did. This used to be a meeting place for them and they left as soon as they clampdown started because they are mentally ill coomers.

Pretending CP is just speech is disingenuous, CP is made intentionally by sexually abusing children. You're not trying to communicate some message with CP, you're trying to fap like a coomer to pictures of children being exploited or abused.

I could moralize about how it's wrong to collect images of children being abused. You could moralize about "muh free speech" but at the end of the day, do you really expect society, which has institutions like family and schools built around protecting and nurturing children because they are the only way our civilization survive, do you really expect us to legalize collecting images of children being abused. If we ever become that decadent we'd collapse soon after

Reductionists will get the rope soon enough.

Attached: reductionists-btfo.png (500x655, 198K)

so age really is, just like, a number, man?

Why dont the mods just delete these threads as soon as they are posted?

kek

mods confirmed for pedos, we need to #cancelmods

>nigga

Kill yourself newfag. And yes. Media is always speech and cp is no exception, the scotus justification was literally "it serves no societal value".

Funny I didnt read anywhere that we only have free speech that old fucking scotus hags deem is acceptable

Kill yourself roody poo

>certain neural pathways signals can get you arrested
How is this fair?

Attached: 1364746981324.jpg (558x564, 47K)

>why dont mods delete this clearly tech related thread?

Go back to your bst or sock thread retard

If you had any idea how wrong that was newfag

pretty much

because then you wouldn't be able to cry about it, then I couldn't call you a faggot.

Because it isn't a police state website. You're free to talk about stuff so long as your discussion is legal and not too cancerous.

all cumbrains in general should get the rope

>Because it isn't a police state website
hello newfag

never been randomly banned before i see

>certain combinations of 1s and 0s can make you COOM

Attached: 1568703664946.jpg (559x586, 90K)

Duuuudeee, age is just, like, a social construct or something, woah, man.

>newfag

this ain't 2010 anymore, what are you gonna do triforce

>. Media is always speech and cp is no exception, the scotus justification was literally "it serves no societal value".
>Funny I didnt read anywhere that we only have free speech that old fucking scotus hags deem is acceptable

That's because you haven't read the constitution which explicitly gives Scotus hags the power to deem what is acceptable under the constitution

You have this purist version of free speech which even allows for CP. I would question how genuine it is - if I put up signs all over you block saying that you are a pedo and encouraging people to kill you, would that fall under free speech? What about if I made deep fake photoshopped pics of you raping children and plastered it over your neighborhood and every workplace you went to.

I think ordinary people think there should be limits on free speech and don't agree with this extreme vision of it you seem to hold where everything goes. "It's media so it counts and I should get to do it" is a poor justification.

But on top of that - you're not doing the moral balancing, which is balancing society's interest in protecting nutring and caring for it's children against your desire to fap.

>certain patterns of colors can make you COOM

Attached: 1565294999049.jpg (480x600, 91K)

Not randomly, but for breaking rules. I posted a pony pic as a joke, thought it would be okay since it was on topic and a clear pun. But some autist reported it and I got banned for a few days. Whoop-de-frickin doo.

Except the basic words of the constitution over ride WHAT THEY SAY when the interpretation is so simple. Which is WHY you have the ability for passing amendments. Which they DID NOT do for this.

>moral balancing

Piss off. Cp wasnt even illegal until the 80s.

SHALL NOT

>certain ones and zeroes can b8 half the globe into circle jerking about the very idea that the written statement is seperate from what is being said in that statement and therefore is not the information at all. which is a paradox, which eventually pulls in more autism, until the idea itself, reaches entropy and everyone abandons it. that is, until it is brought up again by some other autist that wants to justify the publicity of that information by saying it is, once again, seperate from itself, due to the very idea that the written statement is seperate from what is being said in that statement and therefore is not the information at all. which is a paradox, which eventually pulls in more autism, until the idea itself, reaches entropy and everyone abandons it. that is, until it is brought up again by some other autist that wants to justify the publicity of that information by saying it is, once again, seperate from itself

Attached: 1551590007775.jpg (720x540, 22K)

you think I'm gonna read all that shit, nigga? go fuck yourself

fuck off rms

cont.
>infact the existence of the argument is in itself a paradox, due to the fact that both parties will never cease this retarded deadlock, one side clinging to basic reason, and the other so desperate to justify their lack thereof, and cling onto the very idea that the written statement is seperate from what is being said in that statement and therefore is not the information at all. which is a paradox, which eventually pulls in more autism, until the idea itself, reaches entropy and everyone abandons it. that is, until it is brought up again by some other autist that wants to justify the publicity of that information by saying it is, once again, seperate from itself, due to the very idea that the written statement is seperate from what is being said in that statement and therefore is not the information at all. which is a paradox, which eventually pulls in more autism, until the idea itself, reaches entropy and everyone abandons it. that is, until it is brought up again by some other autist that wants to justify the publicity of that information by saying it is, once again, seperate from itself, due to the very idea that the written statement is seperate from what is being said in that statement and therefore is not the information at all. which is a paradox, which eventually pulls in more autism, until the idea itself, reaches entropy and everyone abandons it. that is, until it is brought up again by some other autist that wants to justify the publicity of that information by saying it is, once again, seperate from itself

Attached: 1546047782252.png (617x617, 485K)

if you're going to require every constitutional right be upheld in that pure unlimited form you're going to make the constitution meaningless

does right to bear arms mean right to own private nukes? Does freedom of religion mean freedom to make human sacrifices? Does right to a jury mean the government has to give you a jury trial every time someone challenges a parking ticket or speeding ticket.

Your interpretation of constituional rights in the extreme purist form is self defating and I think more important self serving

and cops historically tended to look the other way when people lynched pedos too -

>do you really expect society, which has institutions like family and schools built around protecting and nurturing children because they are the only way our civilization survive, do you really expect us to legalize collecting images of children being abused. If we ever become that decadent we'd collapse soon after

Do you think it's a coincidence that p*rnographers and coomers target children to such a degree these days, with HRT at 8, drag shows, exposing them to sodomite parades. By destroying that, they destroy the very foundation of our society, and turning into a mess much resembling the coomer state of mind.

Attached: 68887791_486194378834802_6578377154155773952_n.jpg (482x349, 15K)

Certain oscillations of air molecules can get you arrested.

MOOOOOODS

>looked the other way when people lynched pedos

When? In the early and pre 1900s when the age of consent was 10?

MODS MODS MODS AAAAA

PLS MOD S HELP HE LP TASUKE TEE TUSUKE TEE!!

what you're doing is called historical revisionism. Pedos often rewrite history to suit their own view.

The age of consent laws didn't exist in the 1900s and earlier because any kind of sex outside of marriage was considered a crime. Yes people married younger then but child marriages and child sex was still frowned upon - the exception being when societies reached a level of decadence right before their civilization collapsed.

this post makes me severely uncomfortable please remove it

Hexadecimal actually.

Pedo website

That's why you should never run random number generator as a hobby

Go read the rules, especially those pertaining to posts that add no value to the board

Yes this has no place here, take it to /b/

...

>I could moralize about how it's wrong to collect images of children being abused. You could moralize about "muh free speech" but at the end of the day, do you really expect society, which has institutions like family and schools built around protecting and nurturing children because they are the only way our civilization survive, do you really expect us to legalize collecting images of children being abused. If we ever become that decadent we'd collapse soon after

murder and torture videos is showing members of society being destroyed. yet somehow those arent illegal. pi.s. you can be thrown in jail for making CP of yourself how the fuck is that protecting kids?

Why do you sit on here and lie when literally anyone can google this shit?

imgur.com/a/j8SelZn

Can't post images here because I dont have a goy pass

>posts in bst in the other tab

Literally kill yourself newfag rat. There used to be a time when this site was actually for free speech.

Yes. We have rules that help prevent the place from turning into a complete unregulated cesspit of cancer. What we don't do though is ban people and delete posts just for arguing unpopular opinions that go against some people's morals.

violent speech =/= free speech

Unless it is directly inciting people to violent, harmful acts, it is.

>its okay to fuck cunny if youre married

Okay. Let's go back then and let me marry little cunny

there's no line you can place between directly or "indirectly" inciting violence
child porn is violence and defending child porn is therefore violence

01110111 01101001 01101110 01100100 01101111 01110111 00101110 01101111 01101110 01101100 01101111 01100001 01100100 00111101 00101000 00101001 00111101 00111110 01111011 01110011 01100101 01110100 01010100 01101001 01101101 01100101 01101111 01110101 01110100 00101000 00101000 00101001 00111101 00111110 01111011 01100001 01101100 01100101 01110010 01110100 00101000 00100111 01101000 01100001 01100011 01101011 01100101 01100100 00100111 00101001 01111101 01111101

are you hacking the websight?

>watching the video literally physically harms someone

I'm afraid I'm going to have to charge you for murder, the Tarrant shooting webm you clicked on 4cuck makes you guilty.

I really hope retards like you get the unjust imprisonment you'd enforce on others. You dumbasses will never learn or understand until you're treated like the dumb cattle you really are.

I ain't clicking that shit but antedoctal shit like photos isn't evidence retard, one off things happen but that doesn't prove it was the norm

median age of marriage for women in 1890 was 22 "muh look at dis one pic" doesn't make it otherwise

thespruce.com/estimated-median-age-marriage-2303878

but you won't because you're mentally ill. You never see pedos form relationships with children and love them all the way to adulthood because it isn't love, it's mental illness and faggotry.

But as post above shows, average age for marriage in 1890s was 22 for women, and while some married younger they were still in their teens and outside of pedo territory

there are exceptions like the prophet mohammed but even then, historical records show people around him still thought it was fucked up

>not clicking an imgur link

Go the fuck back to faceberg you retarded newfag and stay far away. "Nigga" retard.

>hurr u won't

lmao the absolute state of retarded newfag roastoids.

pedos should rot in hell

youtube.com/watch?v=9j5iKZigEk4

I see you stopped making arguments and reverted to memes and mental illnesses as per your natural decadent state. Please enjoy continuing to be a reviled and hated outsider to civilization

Muhammad is based

>free speech.
You need to grow up, boy

>no arguments
>won't even click an imgur link
Your posts are literally "hurr the law isnt what it says because reasons". Bring the aoc back down ill marry a little girl

marquette.edu/cgi-bin/cuap/db.cgi?uid=default&ID=2123&view=Search&mh=1

Come on, how brain dead are you.
This is the same worthless thread that is posted every day.
the same worthless thread that is posted every day.
the same worthless thread that is posted every day.
Understand now?
The content is only part of the issue.
Christ.

you're 100% guilty if you shared the video
>the Tarrant shooting webm you clicked on 4cuck makes you guilty
this doesn't make you guilty per se, but it warps your mind and normalizes hate and violence
just like video games

pretty sure you could marry 12 year olds, theres like reports of such in Appalachia in early 20th century

>you should be charged with murder for watching a video

The absolute state of nu4chan. I hope every single one of you retards that think like this get killed

9 year old

The Milwaukee Sentinel, February 1, 1937
Sneedville, Tenn.

Shy Eunice Johns, 9, bride of two weeks, alternated between smiles and tears today as scripture quoting montaineer neighbors bestowed mixed blessings upon her marriage to a man 13 years her senior.

Rawboned Charlie Johns, six foot bridegroom, sat by in nervous silence. But not his 33 year old mother-in-law, who had plenty to say in defense of the union.

"The Bible says not to disturb those peacefully getting along, and I don't believe in going against the Bible," firmly declared Mrs. Lewis Winstead.

"If they love one another, then getting married is the thing to do."

Herself married at 16, Mrs. Winstead is a grandmother and has another daughter who married at 13.

Charlie a Good Boy.

"Charlie is a good boy," said Mrs. Winstead, beaming with pride.

"He's a hard worker. He bought 40 acres a few days ago so they could have a home. Of course, understand, I haven't brought my children up to marry what men has got but to marry for love."

Mrs. Winstead heatedly denied Eunice is interested in dolls.

"Charlie bought her a nice, big doll for Christmas, but she only played with it few times," she said. "Eunice is interested in sewing and she is as smart as can be about cooking."

Charlie, clad in new overalls and jumpers, fingered a brown cap and nodded agreement.

Plays with Sister.

Eunice shrank from all the to-do caused by her marriage and spent the day playing with her two year old sister at her mother's mountain home.

"I love Charlie," was all she'd say.

She wore three rings, one a yellow gold band which Mrs. Winstead said was the gift of a neighbor. Her golden hair tumbled over her shoulders and her eyes brightened when her favorite pet, a white rat, scampered across the floor.

Mrs. Winstead said the couple would live with them a while. Her husband, who tills a hilly, 45 acre farm, said "the marriage is all right with me ? there's nothing you can do about it now."

>falling for such obvious bait
The absolute state of nu4chan.

>Sneedville

Attached: 1D3EEA64-9A27-40C1-9921-8231CE9D86C2.jpg (944x706, 39K)

pedophilia is not a crime

Considering the majority of people here defend censorship and criminalizing internet content now how the fuck am I supposed to tell what is bait anymore?

What used to be rare bait is now majority opinion

Charlie was literally ourguy. His wife stayed with him till the end and they had kids. This is what modernisr femcunts think is "horrendous".

Have you ever watched TV? Does all the violence there need to be banned since it incites violence in the same kind of way?

The problem here isn't that I'm not making arguments or saying "because reasons"

The problem is you're IQ isn't sufficent to grasp the reasons I'm giving you. The issue is you're stupid.

I realize that this may sound hurtful but I say it for good reason. That reason is you don't seem to grasp what antedoctal evidene means.

You're using antedoctal evidence - ie -one off examples to try and justify adults marrying children while ignoring the fact that in the vast majority of cases adults didn't marry children

We don't know what these kids are in your example, maybe they are from some off Mormon sect or cult The point is you can't point to one off exceptions to try and create a rule or convince people that something abnormal is normal.

The fact that it wasn't prosecuted then doesn't jsutify it any more than the fact that it is prosecuted now makes it unjustified.

Also screaming freedom into thin air isn't an argument,

So you see, you are too stupid to form arguments and have logical discussion and should stop trying

yes

Nice reddit spacing

like I said, you don't know how to make rational arguments and have rational discussions and so you should stop trying

Attached: bad-argument-false-fallacies-dummies5-5b98cf96934c7__700.jpg (700x656, 69K)

free speech is violence and violence is wrong
if you disagree, you're a bigot

Screaming “muh keeds” isn’t an argument

I want to nakadashi Maisie

>ur dum

Great argument

>u use anecdotes

you used anecdotes in the very post prior to this one and you wouldnt even click an imgur link with a literal snippet from fucking wikipedia. Go back to where you came from newt Gingrich.

>kids are from a cult

The example has a fucking name given and everything you illiterate nigger. Its really all coming together now. The "nigga" in the first post, the projection of low iq, you really are a newfag black "person" aren't you?

The irony. Your entire argument against pedos is in that very picture.

Roody poo self awareness everybody.

CP is tantamount to free speech, therefore it is violence