He never said "the girls were willing"

He said they were most likely presented as willing and questioned whether or not it's appropriate to call it rape if they were presented as willing and it's a valid point.
This whole shitstorm is over a literal fake news article.

Attached: stallman.jpg (3504x2336, 3.2M)

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.en.html
youtube.com/watch?v=NdojsgL8F-0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's a reflection of our times. Moral projection > facts. It's about individualism and collectivism now rather than cause.

Ted Kaczynski was right. The radical left are a danger to our society.

>This whole shitstorm is over a literal fake news article.
And it doesn't matter, once you get targeted by the purple haired twitter mob your professional life is over! Nobody cares about facts, just look at all the faggots here calling him a pedo.

Attached: 1539067127515.png (500x303, 66K)

lmao, you'll do what the humanities majors tell you about your """free software""" autistic hobby and you'll like it

>The radical left are a danger to our society.
RMS is radical left

The radical left are SJWs, modern 'feminists', trans and black lives 'activists', neo-Marxists and those who promote collectivist thinking. It's not the same.

RMS himself has no spine and bends over backwards to those types any time of the day.
gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.en.html

Had he had any sense he would never let the fucking trannies and faggot anywhere near his work. Instead he got overrun by them.

and he qualfiies for half of those, you're just a brainlet who doesn't understand politics and thinks and enemy of your enemy is your friend

If they're being trafficked of course they'll say yes. It's rape and he's a kiddy fiddler.

Actually, he never said it was not rape, just that it was not sexual assault, which involves violence.

imagine getting publicly lynched and fired over an autistic semantic argument holy shit

Attached: .jpg (5000x5000, 1.21M)

RMS is very left when you look at what the left stands for. What amerimutts call leftist in the 21st century is just retarded bullshit, but who'd be surprised that this country produces such bullshit movements?

Yep, he's been hoisted by his own leftist petard.

not to mention his life's work tarnished and his legacy soiled

Attached: 1568715808874.jpg (316x323, 16K)

Why his own? People who are offended by everything aren't his own. They have nothing to do with leftist values. If a conservative politician is murdered by a neonazi, it's not his own, although someone would call both of them "right-wing"

All leftoids should be put in death camps.

free software is collectivist thinking lmao, open source is the individualist version

he is too autistic to play sophisticated social games

National-socialiam is a centrist political ideology, retard.

No it's not a valid point, it was rape, the fuck is he on about

Can someone give to short version of what happened ?

Attached: robert.jpg (800x450, 26K)

Attached: rms.png (1080x542, 205K)

Re-Read the email, he doesn't say it's not rape, just not sexual assault, as Minsky did not use violence.

imagine going to a party and a girl wants to fuck you
not knowing that she's a trafficked minor, you agree
do you think it's reasonable to accuse you of rape?

>MUH HERO DID NUFFIN WRONG.

Attached: 1567748503463.png (1080x1020, 413K)

thus, how on earth "progressive" far-righters are called leftists in america is beyond me

that's correct; cute selfie btw

so if he doesn't say it's not rape he says it's rape, and if he agrees that it's rape how is it not sexual assault?

Low iq

I read enough of the guy's political notes. He actively embraced these people and their idpol until it turned on him. This is an old story, just another subversive Jew getting burned, Brett Weinstein-style.

I find it insane that so many adults are capable of misunderstanding what was said, either in good or bad faith.

it's essentially rape in an objective sense because the girl, even if she was presented as willing, was not actually willing
it's not technically sexual assault because obviously she wasn't assaulted or coerced if she was in fact presented as willing

>Are you willing to suck dicks on my plane for I dunno a Porche or something?
>SURE FUCKING THING
>Not actually willing

Epstein did ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong.
In fact should be praised for promoting entrepreneurship among the young.

Again, why should I care about this fat fuck?

because he fights for your freedom

>adults
w*men and s*yfags aren't normal adults

How?

nowadays he mostly does public speaking and whatnot but he's still the father of GNU and free software
because of him, you're able to be free in the "digital world"

And why should I care about him getting fucked?

because he dedicated his life to fighting for your freedom

>because of him, you're able to be free in the "digital world"
I dont think he invented the internet

which you cannot access without having your freedoms violated on proprietary operating systems

It could happen to any of us. Be careful.

How come no one else has thought of this?

That's a pretty sick view. And he basically had those girls in a Multi-level-marketing scheme to locate more girls. He was a scumbag on many levels.

those are the same exact thing and both are violent, WTF are u on about

it doesn't matter. this is post truth era.

explain.

they're the same thing, at least in the American legal system

think of socially manipulating nerds to make them do whatever you want? it happens all the time everywhere lmao

sure but you can't accuse the guy of rape in this kind of scenario even though it's effectively rape in some objective sense because the girl, wasn't actually willing
you can't say he raped her if he didn't force her to have sex with him himself and didn't know she was having sex against her will

You're gonna defend a fat fuck that would gladly defend false allegations against anyone else. A pedophile one at that.

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Let it happen.

Rape doesn't imply violence.

>neo-Marxists
Fuck off Peterson.

shoving your fully erect penis inside a girl's lower abdomen seems pretty violent to me

retarded
This

>t. twelve years old

Do you also think name calling is violence?

have you ever read his disgusting opinions he wrote on his blog? rms should have been removed years ago.

Then all sex is violence, retard.
If he doesn't have to actually fight her to "rape" her then it's not an assault. She let him have sex with her. If you simply threatened or paid a girl to have sex with you and she said "ok" it's not an assault. It's still rape, but not a sexual assault. An assault would imply physical violence.

>physical penetration
>name calling
yeah those two are effectively the same

t. rapist

Not if you know when to keep your mouth shut it doesn't, especially over shit he clearly didn't know anything about but thought he should opine on. He's a fucking idiot that suffers from USI and got burned because of his hubris.

>if you even question the status quo, you are anathema

You can't be this stupid

A girl that let you have sex with her for money in my country is "supporting prostitution business", nor rape and nor sexual assault, since there's none of that.

If the prostitute is a minor then is "sexual acts with minors" and the felony of supporting prostitution.
If the girl or prostitute is blackmailed/forced/threatened to get sex, then it's rape (which usually is menant as sexual violence in generic form, since it's a sexual violation through some kind of forceful behavior)
But I agree, sexual assault should not be thrown that lightly around.
Also since assault means physical violence.

Take your pills already.

Couldn't be more wrong. Free Software is about having control over *your* computer (and the freedom to share as well), while "open source" is a literal marketing term invented in the 90s to make "Linux" more approachable to businesses. Try using the correct words, bootlicker.

they are doing it themselves like you can see from this issue. there is so much cognitive dissonance in the different branches of leftist doctrine that they will throw each other into the gulag all the time

Can you please put his name or "FSF" in your post so my filter catches it?

No. The fact that RMS' autism makes it extremely easy to manipulate him and that he likely has trouble understanding others'perspectives

why do you hate this man

eat shit and die

uhmm.. getting penetrated is a lot more violent than getting punched or other external violence. You're retarded to even compare it to name calling

no it's not if it doesn't hurt you in any way

And?

...

>all sex is violence
Correct. This is why all men are rapists by default.

>boiling kaczynski's philosophy down to "leftists bad"

youtube.com/watch?v=NdojsgL8F-0
youtube.com/watch?v=NdojsgL8F-0
youtube.com/watch?v=NdojsgL8F-0
youtube.com/watch?v=NdojsgL8F-0

He's 100% correct and absolutely based.

>questioned whether or not it's appropriate to call it rape if they were presented as willing

statutory rape.
guy thinks it's valid to trade candy for sex with children, because they said yes to it?

retards not just on twitter but also in the mongolian forums put any article they find on a pedestal of truth and a "NEED TO DISCUSS THIS CONTROVERSY" to the point where VICE articles get people disgraced and out of a career

all the internet has done in the past couple of years is bring brainletism to the forefront of "discussion"

Attached: 1308116159819.gif (430x304, 8K)

>it's ok to pay for sex and seduce unless the person is 17.99 years old or younger, because the authorities say so

As modern SJWs says, it doesn't matter if the initial accusations were false, what matters is that it "changes the narrative" with regards to women. That's MARXISM 101.

Epstein guy coerced/rapes bunch of 11/12/underage year old girls. One of his girls, 17 year old, asked a MIT alumini if he wants to have sex back in the 80s. MIT guy says nope. Years later, Epstein is jailed. Stuff comes out of closet. The media claims MIT guy sexually assaulted her. Stallman chimed in and said, you can't claim "sexual assault" for which a seemingly(potentially) consensual sex between a 17 year old and a MIT guy. The age of consent is 16 where this meeting took place. If the girl was coerced by Epstein, then chances are MIT guy didn't know about it. That's the gist of his argument. Media then claims "Stallman says Epstein victims were entirely willing" and "Stallman should be fired" etc.

Aka fake news by liberal media.