Discuss.
>inb4 both are shit get X instead
valid opinion, but not part of the discussion, so please be nice and don't post it
Discuss.
>inb4 both are shit get X instead
valid opinion, but not part of the discussion, so please be nice and don't post it
>both
I meant "all"
Manjaro is a shit arch
Mint is shit ubuntu
Ubuntu is shit debian
What to discuss?
If Mint was an Ubuntu flavor it would easily be considered the best one.
>Linux Mint
Very easy to install, with lots of useful programs for most users. Best distro for new users on Linux.
>Manjaro
Uses pacman, but it doesn't use the Arch Linux repositories, as far as I know. At least it has access to AUR, if you have to use it.
>Ubuntu
The distro that lots of Linux users use, even if they use derivative distros like Linux Mint.
young babby
comfy babby
old babby
Just install debian with binary blobs enabled.
You DO know how to install debian, right?
I use Manjaro right now, even if I'm thinking of switching right now. It's the only rolling one of the bunch, so if cutting edge software is important to you, pick that. Otherwise my only experience with Mint is that it was fucking dark on my computer, even if I turned the brightness all the way up. But between it and Ubuntu, it's kinda whatever. Shit can happen everywhere.
Started using linux for real (not just on a lab computer or virtual machine like on a real reg basis) back in Jan. Since the computer is 10 years old I went with xubuntu and it's not been a major problem. When I get a new computer was thinking of going over to Mint or something else instead I just went with xubuntu due to hardware concerns and knew about that one.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of rolling release vs lts? Which is better?