Sex doll/Virtual gf AI

In your opinion, how far away technologically are we from being able to create sex dolls realistic enough that at least as far as physical sensation goes, would be indistinguishable from the real thing? Likewise how far away are we from creating AI advanced enough to be able to simulate a living thinking female girlfriend, not unlike JOI in Blade Runner 2049? Which do you think is more likely to be developed first and what do you think the societal implications of those would be?

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

scientificamerican.com/article/lab-grown-vaginas-implanted-successfully-in-4-teenagers/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openness_to_experience#Intelligence_and_knowledge
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Probably over 1000 years if ever. Technology hasn't really increased much and is only going to slow down more from here on. AI is a meme and anyone who knows how it works will tell you this. All they've accomplished so far is hiring better 3d artists to create better rubber molds to create what's in OPs image. Not sure how you get to JOI from that.

Definitely not within our lifetimes. We have very little idea how the brain actually works, much less how to replicate one. Regrettably, the female question cannot be answered with technology.

Just get a gf op

The kind of people who want a talking sex doll don't want a real person, they want a fuckable waifu that knows their name.
Give them some cute/saucy comments to say, add some personality sliders, and you'll be good.

literally 20 years for a sex machine. Somewhere between 20 and 80 years for the AI part.

To design that would require an extremely high amount of unpaid labor and autistic dedication. Furthermore, anyone who is technically skilled enough to work on such a project would already (or soon enough) be making a high enough income to purchase virtually any real woman he wants and as a result give up on the project far before it's completed.

It's a small chance, but technically it could be an extension of (((pornography))). If a Jew sees a business opportunity, he will fund it.

>Which do you think is more likely to be developed first
Sexbots, definitely. We're not even close to actual AI.
>and what do you think the societal implications of those would be?
Nothing wrong with them as long as they're freedom respecting.

The Realdoll model that just came out is actually really impressive, watch it in motion and tell me this isn't a huge leap forward

Attached: 1568599913844.webm (800x424, 2.93M)

cool but uncanny af
and is this dude literally fucking her/it in this vid?

ph5cc5a1d332b61

i agree with you. however why do "smart people" like carmack, musk and harris disagree with us?

Why does ever sex doll have unrealistic proportions

I just want someone to hug me and tell me shit's gonna be okay man forget about the sex doll bullshit

Attached: gimme-a-hug-man.jpg (221x225, 10K)

funny, I read recently somewhere, I think on Musk's new talk about the brain integration, that they now know the brain works through signals, so while machines go for a binary one, the brain uses signal style having at least 4 variations.

creepy as fuck but pretty close to fuckable.

>Why does ever sex doll have unrealistic proportions

and the doll's face looks too 'hardened' and aged like a prostitute's face... [I'd prefer a doll that looks ~18 with a happier expression]

but yeah maybe 20 years out...

The faces are probably never gonna be good cause of the whole uncanny valley
i just find it weird that every damn body it 2 bowling balls stapled to a literal hourglass

The fuck is this?

>creating AI advanced enough to be able to simulate a living thinking female girlfriend
While being misogynist myself, I don't think women are that dumb.

first off there are already robots capable of tricking you into thinking they are humans, secondly, no actual sex realist would call himself misogynist. Roastie.

>thinking
It seems something that you are incapable of.

i gotchu bro

google it for pornhub link i guess

Not an argument, as expected from a roastie.

far. Why not just settle for better than the real thing? Cleaning will still be an issue for the forseeable future.

>simulating a living thinking female girlfriend
>a sex doll just graduated from uni
See how dumb that sound? A rubber cunt do not need that advance AI.

>Not sure how you get to JOI from that.
They were two separate questions, the only relation between them is them being alternatives to women

Don't know don't care, call me when they can simulate cunny

Attached: fc2326a2fecff7ae518bb095b9b5eebf.jpg (823x1188, 77K)

>face looks too 'hardened' and aged like a prostitute's face
That is most models these days. Just why? And what happened to healthy, happy and smiling people?
Also models seem to be depicted in urban decay, again: why??

All the issues we're having right now are mechanical and materials, given how easily machine learning can learn the nuances of expressions or how fucking Virt-A-Mate can simulate minute changes and dynamic expressions, what we need are motors to drive them that essentially emulate organic muscle tissue and skin materials that aren't fucking raw silicone.

>hurr, it's just electric signals and chemical reactions dude! How hard could it be?
Nigger, we still don't fully understand fucking common cold. You faggots moaning about replicating brain signals/ai are equivalent to Luddites, with zero programming/hardware knowledge., who think they know everything there is to know about computers because they finally learned how to google.

Have sex incel.
Get a GF incel.

Attached: jesusnaruto.png (525x700, 567K)

>how far away technologically are we from being able to create sex dolls realistic enough that at least as far as physical sensation goes, would be indistinguishable from the real thing?

Sensations wise, probably a decade or so

Not him, but fine cunt, we'll refer to them as companion bots then. While sex is important to us, most of us actually want a real relationship and connection with a non retard and care about more than JUST getting our dicks wet. Is this really that hard for you to comprehend? If you read "we want realistic AI equal to an actual GF" as "we want a thinking GF so the sex is better" Then you need some help pal. Can you really not contemplate any other benefits from a multi-purpose sex doll? The OP even makes this distinction in the first two sentences and you still ignore it

Attached: 1538254025537.gif.gif (500x280, 682K)

because you are retarded

>having sex after 30
Who does that?
If you haven't had sex before 30, keep you dignity and remain celibate.

this. the progress in AI is actually quite impressive. The fact that you aren't looking doesn't mean advancements aren't being made

Attached: 1543179047993.png.png (891x392, 48K)

Imagine, you go to start fucking it and it complains of a headache.

This. I'm 35 and my wife is 33. After 2 kids, the dog, house, jobs... All we want to do in bed is sleep...

I though that because IT jobs decrease libido?

Because progress occurs over decades and in tech node jumps. When a disruptive tech emerges we advance so fast we don't even notice it. These 20 years were the Information age, hopefully the next 20 years will be a power revolution age where we get practically unlimited energy from fusion and renewables, along the continued rate of available processing power thanks to new materials and architectures. Our feeble minds cannot comprehend the world that will come the same medieval people could not comprehend ours, but in a span of 50 years instead of 500. If you don't call that progress... whatever man.

Meant to answer this

>now we have these fucking threads every single god damn day

Attached: becca_face_unimpressed1a.jpgt.jpg (539x558, 90K)

I think it may be far closer than we think, hopefully in our lifetimes even.

why do u need an ai

a realistic body that can move .... fuck needing higher functions than that

It is on the spam bot rotation.

Speak for yourself I'm 38 with two toddlers but still want it every day

I really hope people who want sexbots want it to have the possibility of fucking their waifu or other fictional character and not because they cant have sex.

Technologically?

We've already grown replacement vaginas for for over a decade now.

scientificamerican.com/article/lab-grown-vaginas-implanted-successfully-in-4-teenagers/

We've also grown skin for transplants to burn victims.

Ethically, I'm sure some people would gladly sign away some of their cells for use in this application if it were legal.

But even if you can get the physical sensation, but then the cost and burdens of feeding/oxygenation and waste removal that come with living tissue make it impractical for something you just want to get off with and put back in a closet.

...and you don't want to have something like that rotting because the power went out on its life support.

then it continues to browse the phone

I really wanna buy a Gatebox but they don't offer a version in English here

bullshit, they keep adding more layers to their neurals nets but there is no big breakthrough in technique. it's largely just statistical models that no one really understands or has a good theory of.

If you think that AI's are only Neural Networks and Deep Learning/Statistical models you have no idea on actual AI development.

I give it till 2050, new pre-coded knowledge in Ai learning models along with genetic algorythms can actually create an advanced enough AI that can simulate a woman

Why would you want your sex robot indistinguishable from a meatbag?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openness_to_experience#Intelligence_and_knowledge

Attached: 1470907650562.jpg (757x800, 119K)

She actually does that in the ad lmao

Attached: real-doll-harmony-instagram-640x480.jpg (640x480, 56K)

>being able to create sex dolls realistic enough that at least as far as physical sensation goes,

It could be achieved right now if some big ass company got behind it and pumped a bit of money into the research.

>how far away are we from creating AI advanced enough

There are chatbots out there that are already indistinguishable from the average Joe when it comes to conversation.
Anyone who think it's going to take 1000 years or it won't happen during our lifetimes is a god damn retard and can't remember what tech was like only 20 years ago.
Hell, the Boston dynamics bots were spazzing petrol engine retards on for legs only 8 years ago and now they're capable of doing parkour.

Give the field of robotics and AI 20 years and the tech compared to today is going to look like it's from another planet.

Attached: atlas.gif (640x320, 2.9M)

21st century Westerners have no idea about cuteness and suck at stylized depictions of humans. Once the technology is ready, Japan and China will make it look good.

Why make it indistinguishable from the real thing when it’s be easier to make it better than the real thing?

The problem isn’t understanding signaling in the brain so much as that the brain is a biological machine and it is absolutely not uniform across individuals so you’re gonna need some kind of super advanced statistical inference to even attempt to understand what the signals in any given brain actually mean.

More interesting than most of the garbage posted in Jow Forums 2bh

Actual AI (AGI) has not meaningfully advanced in more than half a century.

Robots vs Humans, a nice movie.

Attached: blizzard-is-forcing-overwatch-players-to-drop-pepe-the-frog-meme-520340-2.jpg (1480x832, 99K)

Being a girl in VR is much closer.

Attached: so long 3d.png (421x351, 80K)

>the brain uses signal style having at least 4 variations.
so the brain operates in base 4 instead of binary?

>that at least as far as physical sensation goes, would be indistinguishable from the real thing
Do you mean literally indistinguishable? If so maybe never due to diminishing returns, it would probably be faster to just invent brain-computer interfacing that sends signals to your perception center that manipulates you into perceiving something as a human. However we may get to like 95% similar within a few decades, I believe. Same for social AI, language models etc is progressing at a tremendous pace, GPT-2 for example can generate some pieces of text with context and coherence that would amaze researchers from just 10 years ago.

thats not cunny look at those disgustingly large milkers

These threads make me sad.

Not until actual full-immersion VR

>Likewise how far away are we from creating AI advanced enough to be able to simulate a living thinking female girlfriend
why the FUCK would you want to do this

Why?

Just develop a robot-fetish and you will be enjoying your no-gf life in to time

That's nonsense. 1) Even if we had not progressed at all towards an AGI, we most certainly have progressed with what will undoubtedly be used as building blocks of AGI, such as computing power and artificial neural networks, but 2) we actually HAVE progressed towards actual AGI, some of our systems are remarkably versatile and can solve complex and general problems in their domains, it's just that the domain isn't quite as open-ended as real-life yet. But if you asked a researcher 50 years ago what he would consider the threshold between strong vs weak AI, it's likely we have already passed it with these systems, it's just that the goalpost keeps getting moved. Even when we do invent an artificial agent that can influence the real world to achieve its goals with equal success to that of a human, chances are many skeptics would still not call it AGI due to some arbitrary caveat in which the system differs from an actual human in its methods or implementation.

what are these again i was gonna buy a fig and then forgot about it

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

"AGI" is just a buzzword for people who wrongly believe that AI hasn't really been worked on before. It's a meaningless terms. AI research has always tried to reach human level intelligence. It has been the stated goal for decades.

So stop using this trendy "AGI" bullshit with a "G" in the middle to somehow distinguish it and actually educate yourself on what actual AI research has been doing.

Attached: chuck-e-cheese-gif-4.gif (360x270, 1.03M)

Attached: 1539819517219.webm (640x800, 2.86M)

Rather stalk a real one and put her in a coma using insulin.

I'd rather have this than another /v/ thread

I JUST WANT A BONBI DOLL TO HUG AND CUDDLE WITH!

Attached: I WANT IT.jpg (1000x887, 75K)

loli dolls and loli onahole exist. it's only a matter of time until lolibots become real

This will definitely be banned in the west though.

I know this feel.

physically, they already can be vastly superior than the real thing
not really a big achivement, since every male with hands already has a woman replacement for free
and who the fuck cares for unnecessary AI in a sexdoll?

if shit's realistically not gonna be okay, it's better to accept it than to hear sweet nothings and have a breakdown later

This is kek

i am pretty sure its easier to wear VR and have it induce the emotions into our brain than to replicate a real human being with motors and steel rods
who wants that anyway? I would rather hang out with my waifu in our imaginary cabin with VR and skin sensors

>Probably over 1000 years if ever.
Not sure about that. There are GFs that barely seem conscious.

Attached: e5248289627.jpg (950x534, 43K)