Women rights are the great filter, give women rights and stallman is cancelled. I believe we have solved fermi paradox, all retarded civilizations gave women rights and then fell because of bullshit claims, no dark matter, no dark energy, just stupid women
Women rights are the great filter, give women rights and stallman is cancelled. I believe we have solved fermi paradox...
The announcement of the Friday event does an injustice to Marvin Minsky:
“deceased AI ‘pioneer’ Marvin Minsky (who is accused of assaulting
one of Epstein’s victims [2])”
The injustice is in the word “assaulting”. The term “sexual assault” is so vague and slippery that it facilitates accusation inflation: taking claims that someone did X and leading people to think of it as Y, which is much worse than X.
The accusation quoted is a clear example of inflation. The reference reports the claim that Minsky had sex with one of Epstein’s harem. (See theverge.com
Let’s presume that was true (I see no reason to disbelieve it).
The word “assaulting” presumes that he applied force or violence, in some unspecified way, but the article itself says no such thing.
Only that they had sex.
We can imagine many scenarios, but the most plausible scenario is that she presented herself to him as entirely willing. Assuming she was being coerced by Epstein, he would have had every reason to tell her to conceal that from most of his associates.
I’ve concluded from various examples of accusation inflation that it is absolutely wrong to use the term “sexual assault” in an accusation.
Whatever conduct you want to criticize, you should describe it with a specific term that avoids moral vagueness about the nature of the criticism.
Women shouldve never been given the same rights as men. they are not men, they are not the same, their sex has never fought for those rights, their sex has no history ruling, leading or affecting societies in the way men have.
They get rights and immediately do stupid shit like raise the age of consent, and then shortly after shit like criminalizing speech, replacing people in their own countries and more are close behind.
Men gave away women rights. In fact it was the social powers who desperately needed a second voter base because no normal man would vote against his own good and vote socialist. Socialists are vile psychopaths who willingly destroy the culture and history of their host country to further their own agenda.
Yes women need """""" men """""""" like that because they can't do anything alone. Prey on the mans natural instinct to protect women and coddle them while simultaneously stabbing the entire gender in the back.
You get the best of both world's as a modern woman. Coddle and protection and simultaneously the same rights men used to get.
I think the problem, moreso than giving women rights, is the kind of woman who ends up getting pushed into these professional positions in the first place. The women who are represented in these high-powered careers are not really women, but are female-bodied facsimiles of male archetypes. Rather than truly make a push to integrate women as they are into the workplace, the (((people))) who organize and administrate society decided to force a subset of women to squeeze themselves into man-shaped boxes in order to chase prestige and financial rewards. The women who feel compelled to live this way do not cope well with it, and therefore become bitter, resentful, and vindictive, and ultimately become infatuated with finding ways to attack other people. And because they are still women, the methods they employ are naturally passive-aggressive and petty, and trend toward defamation, slandering, and character assassination.
tldr we didn't give women rights. We gave hateful pseudo-dykes the right to fuck with everyone as a way to appear superficially egalitarian.
Thats just because women are supposed to be family makers and run a tribes knitting circle not be career chasers or worker drone #23048291
OP, why are all these people you're naming jews?
This seems to be a tad antisemitic.
The problem is media/social media incentivized at all times to push the most distorting version of a news story that they can to maximize clicks and ad revenue. If news outlets were subscription models or independently financed, they would still have their biases but at least would lessen their penchant for intentionally distorting facts and crafting misleading headlines that effectively assassinate their target over what is simply a poorly worded phrase or argument.
Feminism has became female chauvinism!
news24.com
>supposed to be
We need more women in firefighting, fuck the burn victims, women can do just as goos even if the whole world burns
>has became
oh sweet summer child, it always was
:)
Don't worry it's already being taught on every irc, reddit, here and more places to come! NON STOP DRUM BEATS! Watch it trend in the news with in 32 days!
:D
This thread is dangerously red pilled. How long until redditors come
The problem starts when they enter the workforce. The problem needs to be stopped before that happens. Or it’s to late to stop them from voting.
The purpose of sex is not to make babies. This was already accomplished by asexual reproduction. The purpose of sex is to drive competition. This reduces the risk of evolutionary complacency as the result of mastering an environment, and when implemented as a zero-sum game, as is the case with sex, doesn't put any additional pressure on the first species to evolve it, only on the individuals within that species in their internal struggles with each other. Females are the limiting factor in reproduction, and hence face no evolutionary pressure from social causes.
>Stupid shit
It's completely rational from their perspective. The drive of childless females is to breed with the top males. Women's tendency to create drama and conflict is inherently sexual, as most women are guaranteed to be desired by most men, but the reverse is not true, their drive is to filter the men, not to make themselves more appealing. Nation states and property rights exist to protect men from sociopolitical evolutionary pressures that only men experience, and hence nations and property rights are obstacles from the perspective of women, who want to expose men to as much conflict as is possible, in order to filter the top men from the rest, and thus identify who they should be breeding with. The ideal man is the physically superior one, but choosing them could result in a wealth disadvantage compared to other males with more wealth. Physical traits can't be redistributed, so the easiest way to create ideal men is to redistribute all wealth to equality, at which point there is no disadvantage for choosing the physically superior men.
It's more than just socialism. Post national capitalists also want power transferred from men to women as well, as women are responsible for the overwhelming share of consumption. Transferring wealth from men to women is effectively just transferring wealth from men to the corporations selling shit that women are more likely to buy.
Based and redpilled
Except men aren't allowed in modern society to push ANY of their strengths or drives or evolutionary desires. We can't go fuck loads of women, use strength against weaker sex, have multiple wives etc. The law and everything else is against men.
What youre defending is a woman having absolute control over every aspect while the man is crippled.
>inb4 incel, sexist, have sex, cuck, etc..
replace men with "weak men" and you're correct
strong men lead society as they always have, you're just a sore loser
Youre a retard. Even strong men dont have loads of babies and kids and "strong men" in the way youre speaking is like .0000001 percent of the pop.
youre just yet another gynocentric roasty cunt. you promote giving essentially every single woman total control over every aspect while shitting on every man and saying "lol get over it"
I seriously hope you get repeatedly raped. You dumb weak cunt.
Well I shouldve known it wouldnt last. The femcunt redditors are here now.
Women only have rights because men allowed them to have rights.
If men collectively decided that women should have no rights they will have no rights.
I fought in jiu jitsu against women. I'm pretty positive that the average untrained male can kill the average women with his bear hands in less than three minutes.
Men have all that power in the world. We should use it for our advantage for a change.
Go back to Youtube, Stefan.
Classic incel, pretend you're talking to a woman on fucking Jow Forums's Jow Forums
"strong men" are men who have the power and ability to do what they want, which doesn't usually mean having kids because most of them don't care about having kids in this day and age. The only men who can't push their strengths or evolutionary desires (ie. have sex) are repulsive men at the bottom of the social hierarchy, it's hilarious when you act like you're the 99%