9900KS HAS 127W TDP - HOUSEFIRES CONFIRMED

p =c*f^3

so ~248 watts (1.9844*5^3) when running at all core turbo

>127W
When not boosting. OCed I bet it'll easily get to FX 9590 territory.

>250w all core turbo
If that is real, holy shit. Imagine all core OC, I'd imagine it won't be hard to get to the 280w that new 64c128t Epyc chip puts out.

This is exactly what I needed to finish my nuclear reactor.

This its literally bulldozer all over again.
Can't wait for intcel to die

Idle 127W kek

because nobody bought them

Attached: Rami9el.jpg (1440x1080, 706K)

goddamn retards everywhere. no matter how poor, competition is a must. if there is one company making chips (or anything) it means that development might aswell stop, they can ramp up prices as much as they want and sell 5 tears okd shit for double the price back then. i dont care much for performance so i honestly hope you get what you wish for and suffer the consequences, i really do.

Attached: tenor.gif (492x342, 781K)

Do you guys think a ryzen 9 3900x would work in an itx case like a fractal nano s?

>9900KS HAS 127W TDP - HOUSEFIRES CONFIRMED

SHITEL POZZED HOUSEFIRES ETERNALLY BTFO

>127W TDP and 127 hardware security vulnerabilities

yike

nah, 5ghz allcore on 9900k is already at 300W

And someone will buy this?

Sometimes I like to just relax in the cool breeze generated by frantic shills having their little shill war. I think the wind comes from their arm hair.

It's just a saying. Intel will never die, look how many shills they have. They also have most of the market still.

What needs to happen is for Intel to be reduced to 10-25% of the market so they will be forced to innovate like amd was.

I guess its just cooling it which is the problem, AIO water cooler with as big as a radiator which can fit id imagine.

just delid delap and use chiller bro

Dying is too good for Intel. They need to wallow in shit and mediocrity for 100 years. AMD doesn't want Intel to die, either, just for them to become the next Nokia.

>i9 9900ks
>ks
more like kms lmao

based

Arm apple and others will step up
Intcel is in a worse position than amd was in 2016

New 64-core Epyc chip is rated at 225W and it rarely ever exceeds that in non-AVX workloads

intelaviv idiotic fans?

So basically mentally ill fans.

THE READINGS....IVE NEVER SEEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS, IT USES A THERMAL FORCEFIELD, PURE HEAT MELTING OUR PROJECTILES
*Ikari in the back, reflective glasses on* : you promised me 5GHz allcore on stock cooling professor ...

Attached: main-99.png (640x400, 386K)

what's the problem, my toaster draws more power than that

This, Intel will dissolve in 5 years, screencap this

>Intel is fucking bankrupt.
word is, they're paying oem's again, they will use every single trick in the book m8 and they will keep their number one spot.

Attached: 1554575049793.gif (487x815, 587K)

THEY PROMISED 5GHZ ON AIR SINCE 2014
>doesnt remember the 4790k

*amd finished
ftfy

Should be called i9-9590K.

Hey dinglepuss, all CPU can exceed TDP, greatly. Try 250W at load. A 3900X takes 400W. Yep.

>Hey dinglepuss, all CPU can exceed TDP, greatly. Try 250W at load. A 3900X takes 400W. Yep.

Attached: 1491958654249.png (653x726, 84K)

3900x at 400w?

ok.....

So... above 300W in real workloads?

>3900X
142W PPT. Yep.

>intel is literally dying

How is this different from buying a regular 9900k and overclocking it to 5 GHz all core manually?

Attached: 1496213206422.png (326x321, 201K)

this is exactly what I needed for the winter
this and my 290x will warm my 3rd world neighborhood for the winter

Attached: 1305118150550.jpg (425x282, 118K)

It doesnt let intel charge a premium for it and give the marketing dip shits something to do

>intel is overpriced housefire
>amd has shit software (BIOS, drivers), bad single thread, gets fucked by OS threading implementation
what do I even buy any more? For fuck sake.

Attached: pink.png (680x708, 387K)

the thread scheduler has been fixed for a while now

VIA.

Sure, but I'm seeing more posts and videos all the time that hint that it's not properly fixed or some shit, or that there's some other software bug causing AMD's perf to be gimped. I don't want to buy a CPU and spend hours fucking around with software tweaking just to get the expected performance.

That's 7742. The new one is 7H12 or something like that, and comes with 280W TPD and higher base clock.

i remember when jayztwocents and his fat friend barnacules were laughing about amd stock hovering around 1$. whos laughing now, shills?
well...you still....probably. you probably up and switched loyality from intcel to amd without skipping a beat as soon as amd offered you money under the table like intcel did before them.

wh-okay?? just get a decent cooling system...what the fuck is this post even attempting to do?

>Intel
>bankrupt

Top Kek!

Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-19 Intel - Wikipedia.png (328x180, 8K)

> tomshardware
lmao. no wonder you were banned from reddit. rage harder, AMDrone.

Attached: 1550650861755.png (1148x293, 31K)

TOP KEK

i had pentium d 925. it was okay.

I mean, Nokia is not bankrupt either but, you know

Go back.

>127W TDP
How do you even fuck things up that much?

>next Nokia
Dying for few years and returning with god tier phones?

>5GHz allcore on stock cooling
Someone didint had 2500k

N95 was basically their glory days, 12 years ago.

It's literally just a factory overclocked 9900k. You're basically just paying for the convenience of not having to do it yourself.

>was
I still use it.

Are they really going to release the same product for more money? Can't wait to see Intelcucks spend their money on this.

I have never cared about TDP or temps.
All I care about is how fast it is.
My open loop can take care of the temps and noise.

It's a binned 9900k.
Just like 100% of the 8086k could do 5.0ghz while only 80% of the 8700k could do 5.0ghz.
Probably cheaper than silicon lottery
I'm considering one, I want to hit 5.2-5.3ghz so I can finally have a chip that out clocks my 2600k at 5.1ghz.

Probably also flammable, gonna help the fire...

Also, is intel still posting TDP at stock clock, not boost?

>p=c*f^3
>1.9844*5^3
what the fuck
where did you get that and what does it mean

>will it work
Yes of course.
You'll just be fighting heat. You can always undervolt and reduce clocks slightly.

Yeah, but they're also lying about it, so it will probably draw ~300w+, just the cpu.
Ryzen would've rated the same cpu at TDP of at least 150-160w

COPE

electrobian.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/cmos-vlsi-design.pdf#page=211

since switching power dominates over leakage (under load) and short-circuit, and frequency ~ voltage, you can just plug in base frequency and power and solve for ~ capacitance. use that plus a new frequency to get a coarse-grained approximation of the corresponding new power

>when running at all core turbo

Intel's numbers at stock clock tend to be reasonable, even overestimated sometimes
A stock 9900k when limited to 95W will actually push 4.1-4.2Ghz which is a good bit over stock clock

Yeah sure, try it on avx

>130W Idle TDP
They would have done us a favor naming it the i9-9590K(Y)S.

>127W TDP
So as much as a Q6600?

>127 Intel-Watts TDP

Attached: 1566255766375.jpg (200x200, 23K)

Unlike FX, the 9900k is fast as hell.
Fx was slow, ran hot, and sucked power like a cheap Hooker.
Also, Intel's TDP is only for base clocks.
So probably 4.0-4.1ghz
5.0ghz all core would be around 180-200 depending on how good the bins are.

> look how many shills they have
Judging by these non-stop anti-Intel threads, i would take a gander that there are a lot more AMD shills out there.

AMD fans are more outspoken because they all have Inferiority complexes.
I know, because I was once one of them.

so intel will have the 9900KS and 10900K available simultaneously?

But your mom cares about the electric bill intcel

There's definitely shills for both companies here. Who has more? I can't tell. But I can tell there's a lot of posting that smells like bots/marketers anytime there's a thread involving these companies.

Very cool, it's going to be a nice upgrade for my 9900k

9900ks to milk lga1151 and 10900k to replace 9900k in less than a year.

>Only 127W
That's nothing for Intel.
extremetech.com/computing/288808-intel-launches-new-xeons-with-up-to-56-cores-400w-tdp
anandtech.com/show/14182/hands-on-with-the-56core-xeon-platinum-9200-cpu-intels-biggest-cpu-package-ever

Attached: 1568942565061.png (1116x788, 418K)

I pay $0.08 per watt hour at the house I currently own at 23yrs old.
I've also fucked a athletic trainer at this house.
Sure she was older than me and average looking.
But still counts.

you will win you start crashing because the ESP12V 4+4 can't handle the load

That's the TDP numbnuts, the actual chip consumes 2x as much

Basically every modern CPU with more than 6 cores and close to 5GHz is going max out the power connector. But keep dreaming about muh gigahurtz and moar coars you fucking fags.

>He buys sub $200 Mobos with shit VRMs

You can pull 300w from a 4+4 though.
Many overclockers have stated this.
The Autism bad hair OC guy successfully pulled 500w from one.

I ain't saying that's safe for 24/7 use, but a 8pin + a 4pin is plenty of power even for Intel's old 14nm+++ Skylake chips.