Have you written a heartfelt letter of support to stallman-sama?
Have you written a heartfelt letter of support to stallman-sama?
>email
boomer detected.
>not sending stallman mail directly via carrier parrot
newfag
I hope you used a open-source email to talk with him.
open-source isn't same as free you dimwit
of course. as soon as I discovered that slandering
twatter tranny
This is really worrying. Stallman had many candidates to replace him (all of them shared his views) but the way that email is worded makes it seem like there is something going on in the FSF that might prevent any of his candidates from being elected.
I’m writing this because I’m too angry to work.
i felt not annoying him would be the best option
yes
>Stallman resigns from the FSF
>The FSF board votes him back
>Stallman becomes the FSF president again
It would be epic and the SJW meltdown on Twitter would be delicious
>you'reself
Blacks are not allowed on this site.
I did 2 days back. I asked him to press charges against everyone involved with the defamation articles for the sake of his name and the reputation of the FSF. I just can't let it slide that all the news outlets just blatantly lied and caused all of this to happen. I thanked him too for all he's done to show him some appreciation amidst this shitstorm. Still waiting for a reply though.
testing basedboy
Sure
I wrote half a letter before it got so late I had to go to bed, I'm going to finish it and send it, I also plan on sending a letter to the FSF to demand Stallman be voted back in.
I encourage everybody else to do the same if you care about Stallman or the FSF.
Stallman did nothing wrong!
>@fsf.org
Yes please
Reelect Stallman. Start the campaign!
I am genuinely glad that Stallman has resigned from the FSF
The free software movement needs more politically capable people to lead it. It should not be ideologically diluted but with autists like Stallman it'd never get anywhere.
i save my support for those i think are in trouble
if he was a liar, or a manipulator, or a cheat, a scam artist, a con, a dupe, perhaps then, would i vent my frustration at how i have been had
cowards die many times
politically capable... sure maybe if they weren't insane communist faggots but you KNOW damn well that's what we'll get, some pronoun rapist
can't wait
are you actually going to do any of the things he requested?
I would like Stallman to be voted back in, but thats not gonna happen, and even if it does, he is pretty old, id be surprised if he could still give speeches for long, maybe like 10 years top
realistically id like to see executive director John Sulivan take Stallmans place, I learned of him from the Lunduke interview he did 2 years ago, then went on to watch a couple more videos of him, he seems like a cool guy, but he owns a phone, a free phone, but it still tracks you
Fuck you.
> Have you written a heartfelt letter of support to stallman-sama?
Yes: lkml.org
(also sent to [email protected], no response for some reason)
Subject: SFConservancy attacks RMS. - SFConservancy: GO TO HELL
> Software Freedom Conservancy
>Verified account @conservancy
>
> The fight for diversity, equality and inclusion is the fight for
> software freedom. Our movement will only be successful
> if it includes everyone. RMS does not speak for these values.
> twitter.com/conservancy/status/1173603417769545734
Dear SFConservancy. You might not understand the lawyer-speak, being
headed for the longest time by a mere techie (ie: one who thinks arrays
are a "necessary language tool"), but Free licenses are Revocable from
free-takers.
Keep attacking the men who created the software and the men will
eventually move to revoke your gratis licenses of their copyrighted
works and burn the legal framework of Free Software to the ground (a
framework that relies mostly on ignorance of the vagaries of copyright
and licensing law).
Look, Free Software world, I told you a decade ago NOT to invite random
women and non-techies into your world: you will gain nothing and they
will set themselves up as gate keepers to your community.
They have done so. They just kicked out RMS from his own foundation. Who
knows what "GPLv4" will contain now.
(Not that it matters: you can still revoke free licenses from
free-takers regardless of what "terms" were "agreed upon" (no
consideration on the part of the taker means no contractual rights to
hold the distributee to))
RMS said absolutely nothing wrong: just things White Women and their
golem-like white "men" find offensive.
(YHWH allows child brides, including in cases of rape (taphas): Devarim
chapter 22, verse 28 (Hebrew Masoretic Text: Na'ar (child), Greek
Septuagint: Padia (child, root word for paedophile), Latin Vulgate:
Puella)
(continued)
It's time to move Free Software and OpenSource out of America. America
is the global enemy of all men anyway: why deal with the savages that
slaughter countless innocents in the near-east because "they marry young
girls, BETTER A MILLSTONE!" etc? Why associate yourself with such evil
torturers and murderers that are the Proud American (White) Man (and his
female Masters)?
> Regarding threats to "CoC" you. - You do have recourse - license
> rescission
lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/9/434
> For easy to read by lay-people discussions on this topic:
lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/4/334
lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/3/698
lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/20/444
> For legal articles and treatises that agree: no consideration from GPL
> free-taker, no contract, revocable by the copyright holder:
scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1857/
www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/0131487876
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=243237
He hates us though. Why should we support him now?
You are a betrayer, as are the people at the FSFe, the Gnome foundation, the SFConservancy.
Shame Stallman is no Putin.
>that font size
couldnt read
Stallman fucking founded the Free Software Foundation you insufferable twit. He's the one who got it this far.
It took a while, but Lennart and Shuttleworth are finally having the last laugh.
Commie cunt got a commie treatment. Some people never learn.
from: [email protected]
to: [email protected]
subject: Stay Strong
Dr. Stallman,
I want to thank you for your life's work in promoting the freedom of software users around the world. You have been instrumental in building a community based on a sound ethical foundation. For that, as well as your well-known contributions to the GNU C Compiler and Emacs, those of us who are able to enjoy more freedom cannot give you too much honor.
I got into hacking and software development relatively late in my life (after I graduated from university), but you have been an inspiration to me and I'm sure many others to contribute to the community that you founded.
Seeing the way you have been attacked and your words misconstrued is utterly sickening, and the motives behind it are clearly unjust. This has motivated me to become more active in the free software community to ensure that the values that you have shared with us continue to be cherished and upheld.
Happy hacking,
user
Yes, It's been 3 days and no response...
Was it an autistic email?
No,
from: me@vincentmail
to: [email protected]
subject: Don't Give Up!
Hello Richard,
I know how difficult these past few days must have been. I just want to let you know that there are those of us who stand-with and support you through all of this.
You are a good person, and no amount of misinformation will ever change that. So please, don't give up! Don't stop fighting! Always remember that there are people out there that know the real you.
Thank you for everything you have done for the betterment of mankind as it relates to software, and a big thank you in advanced for all you will continue to do in the future. We really are inspired by the dedication and raw passion that you put forth each day.
>Meesinfurmachun
He's autistic so he might be offended at the idea that you know the real him. He probably farted, picked his nose, and deleted it.
Yes. he didn't reply.