LLVM 9.0.0 released
lists.llvm.org
Why are you not compiling with LLVM, user?
/llvm/ LLVM General
Josiah Walker
Jordan Stewart
ur mom
Alexander Jackson
because stallman said it violates my freedom
Liam James
Stallman also said rape victims deserve it.
Thomas Martinez
You need to go back, and take your fake news with you.
>>>www dot reddit dot com
Caleb Lewis
He wasn't wrong user
Jeremiah Baker
Because it's hot garbage.
>API generates invalid IR every single time
>IR changes incompatibly every single bugfix-patchlevel
>documentation always out of date
>still slower than g++
>crap primitives for languages not backed by C idioms
Ethan Ross
FUD.
If it was that bad, Opensuse, FreeBSD and other systems wouldn't be built with it.
>GNU fanbois are getting desperate
Xavier Martin
They aren't
>butthurt llvm tranny logic
Hudson Long
>llvm tranny
Just because GNU's full of trannies, doesn't mean LLVM has them at all.
Christopher Bennett
Dylan Nelson
I was glad when this project came about in the first place and made things competitive.
I'm glad now that they're still working hard, and continuing to innovate.
Carter Rodriguez
>Why are you not compiling with LLVM, user?
Adacore hasn't released the Ada LLVM frontend yet. Supposedly they are making an announcement about it soon (tm). I'd imagine it'll be using LLVM 8.x tho.
Ethan Hall
I think pedo RMS apologists should stop using Jow Forums and live in the woods.
Andrew Roberts
no u
John Thomas
clang is fucking based, fuck GNU
I'm getting closer to say fuck off to Red Hat Linux and go FreeBSD, but it probably doesn't even support my fs lmao
Parker Ross
Dragonfly makes a better desktop, with good gpu support and proper SMP implementation which differentiates it from FreeBSD and Linux. It does however use GCC.
The most annoying shortcoming is that it has no Linux compatibility layer.
Samuel Adams
What is LLVM and why is it better than whatever I already use?
Sebastian Young
Both statements arent contradictory
(Thats not what he said tho)
Bentley Walker
>The most annoying shortcoming is that it has no Linux compatibility layer.
Why would you need this? That's only useful for proprietary software.
William Watson
Just noting it.
To me, it means no steam gaymen, mainly.
Which is fine because I do the gaymen stuff on a machine that's pretty much dedicated to that.
Brandon Lee
>license changed to apache
OPENBSD BTFO
go back to GCC hahahhahahah
Wyatt Collins
goddammit
now i have to recompile
it takes so goddamned long to compile
why they can’t just provide precompiled native windows binaries for all their libraries is fucking beyond me
the c APIs are limited and not an actual substitute for the C++ libs
Aiden Thomas
Does it help the industry produce proprietary compilers?
Austin Morgan
lists.llvm.org
marc.info
>As stated before the APL 2.0 poses a serious problem for OpenBSD as it
contradicts the poject goals of providing a freely distributable base
operating system that includes all the tools to build from source.
Angel Cruz
I compile my android kernel with it.
Matthew Bell
he never said that
Wyatt Thompson
anyone using it as a compiler back end?
Henry Campbell
>can compile linux
GCC on suicide watch
Landon Bailey
Really gets the noodle goin, eyy Bert?
Elijah Sullivan
>Support for asm goto, enabling for example the mainline Linux kernel for x86_64 to build with Clang
I thought the big issue was variable-length arrays in the middle of structs rather than the end or some other GNU extension like that.
Ayden Foster
Yes he is correct. But only when its women getting raped.