The next OpenBSD release will be limited to 1 core only

>the next OpenBSD release will be limited to 1 core only
oh no no NO NO NO NO NOOO

Attached: Untitled.jpg (728x186, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bsdstats.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Nobody uses OpenBSD.

What?

OP’s still ass hurt the OpenBSD people turned off hyper threading and thus broke most Spectre variants.

Meanwhile canoe slash line ucks is vulnerable to every new Intel flaw along with windows and OS X.

>Your head hurts? Just cut it off lmao
The state of (You)

are you sure you don't just have only one core?

are you even using mp kernel?

>1 core
>Hyperthreading

Attached: I+support+independence+but+had+a+good+laugh+at+this+_6ba3a259b0e4368043945291b77ee9ed.jpg (912x905, 96K)

>Doc, my hand hurts, what do I do?
>Fuck off, I don't care
>Ok *cuts hand off*

OpenBSD's kernel is giant-locked, which means that if one thread is using the kernel for any reason, no other thread can use it (even for a different reason), and has to block.

But there is still userland multiprocessing. But now OpenBSD developers have also disabled hyper-threading, because they really love their one or two cores.

Meanwhile DragonflyBSD scales to 64 cores and you can still listen to music and play video games and watch movies and compile something while serving millions of requests.

As soon as Theo gets cancelled by the twitter mob we all need to jump ship to Dragonfly.

not really, it was during the time Absolute OpenBSD, but they got it slightly better over time.

Why dragonfly and not freebsd?

im fairly sure openbsd doesn't have programs that require more than 1 core

Ass hurt tranny detected.

>Meanwhile canoe slash line ucks is vulnerable to every new Intel flaw
there has been a patch since day 1 or 2 retard

bsdstats.org/
only Jow Forums shills openbsd
I bet the 6 people using it are all here defending this garbage OS in every thread

of the public being aware, yes

you're implying people don't upgrade openbsd?
then it's as secure as windows retard

im implying that the flaws are patched after the public notified of them, not before

what can you even do on openbsd
there is no games or software

security flaw is discovered (in private)
->
time passes (for some value of time)
->
security flaw is made public (for some value of public)
->
security flaw is patched

can you share the wallpaper?
also what's that wm called looks cool

this. dragonfly is great but freebsd is better in every way when it comes to desktop use

They disabled now SMT by default, but you can enable it with sysctl with one line in the terminal

sysctl hw.smt=1


SMP should work as expected as far as I know

>hey guise my lists are opt in to show your support~!XD
>roasties 200% shook when the whore oses gain the big upcummies
dial 8 and become a statistic, or go back to distro watch.

To some extent, OpenBSD is a reference implementation of good software and development. You can use doas or LibreSSL on linux, for example, because they've been ported.
Some people use it for servers, I think netflix use it.

>(for some value of patched)

Netflix use it for traffic shaping but freebsd/trueos is 99% of their app hosting data due to ZFS pools. They load up 5xmirror vdevs and then they never ever need to open the box again but still get very decent performance.

>we are trying to demonstrate to hardware and software vendors out there that *BSD should be viewed as a serious operating system, not just as a hobbyist system, for support (ie. hardware drivers) purposes.
lmao imagine if GNU/Linux was that desperate for corporate contributions

Attached: 1568408845323.jpg (800x600, 177K)

hyperthreading is not multicore

To be fair most of that mindset is born from the fact most BSD fags actually own their own small companies and need something that the actually corporate world can generate business practices for. Linux is mostly about ad-hoc production in the first place.
Also
>unironically trying to still push ganoo even now
all the power to you bro, but your pope has been canceled.

the kernel lock is better than having mutexes on literally every call in Linux.

multi-core works fine. hyperthreading is different.

Amdahls law shows that all this multithreading isn't helping anyway. it's helpful to have multiple cores to run multiple processes, but coordinating parallelism is a meme

True, but rms getting cancelled doesn't really matter since his ideas are shared by basically everyone in the FSF.

Attached: 1562635713349.jpg (875x647, 99K)

*changes logo again*

>doas
why reinvent the wheel?

So thats why OpenBSD runs at half the speed of linux

Someone audited LibreSSL some years ago and found more issues than in the fixed OpenSSL. Theo is a meme

ehhh my guy :^)

dilate

nice meme

Attached: memes.png (3300x874, 1.63M)

hello newfriend
now fuck off

holy shit, the absolute state of theo's autism
migrate to dfly BSD already

don't make me cri

Attached: D81D96626B154B27BF4067F4E63BEDAA.gif (480x270, 392K)

this user is asking the real questions in this thread

you need to provide a big source for that

security flaw with hyperthreading is discovered (in private)
->
time passes (for some value of time)
->
security flaw is made public (for some value of public)
->
no patch needed because openbsd already disabled hyperthreading 6 months ago