42 year old fat man

C++ still can do everything Rust can do and more. I'm a zoomer and even I know your argument is shit.

>old good
>new bad

Attached: 1537379077871.jpg (480x480, 28K)

Rust syntax is fucking disgusting

>C++ still can do everything Rust can do and more.
see C++ doesn't even handle unicode

C++20 boy

Attached: 77019622-E01B-484D-A96A-896E9CDBF673.jpg (800x2000, 196K)

C++20 doesn't bring unicode handling.

>new good
>old bad
Femanon here. I use C++. Not interested in wasting my time on an ugly dead language like Rust.

Attached: Cirno.full.977947.jpg (1600x1200, 677K)

we already have unicode handling you enormous faggot. Have you heard of wstring?

The time of systems languages is over.

>Femanon here
>weeb pedo picture
Didn't read any more

wstring does NOTHING to handle grapheme clusteres you clueless CS101 monkey

>proven language with formal specification bad
>nu-language without formal specification good
[(You)r face].webpee

Rust got the be the ugliest language of all time, the syntax is just aiwful.

you and your modernism why can you admit that there isnt much of a difference. there are just different ways of writing in it

>Didn't read any more
Rust people are extremely rude.
>wstring does NOTHING to handle grapheme clusteres you clueless CS101 monkey
Sorry I can't hear you over webdev whinging.

>appeal to authority
Spoken like a true NPC

you talking to yourself?

based cirno poster

That doesn't prove C++ can't do it.

>weeb pedo
This is how you know you're dealing with a Rust homosexual
>reddit space
Fucking kill yourself and your shit language.
You SJW fuckers destroyed the FSF, there's no way we are going to let you take over the computer language space.

Bruh the syntax is soooo ugly, why would anyone use Rust you brainlet. All rustfags can do is spread #RIIR

Cargo is shit and half functioning

>i have no idea of what was said is, but i'm still gonna post a reply
Typical unt[Rust]able homosexual that follows the latest fads presented by others, and is literally unable to form his own opinion on any subject.

>That doesn't prove C++ can't do it.
Prove it can. where's the equivalent code?

>me
>SJW
Anyone who doesn't use your 40 year old stale garbo lang is not an SJW, go whinge somewhere else. I have always supported RMS, you .pol/ monkeys are the one who sided with the SJWs to celebrate RMS's downfall.

>Reddit spacing
off yourself already

Nothing wrong with reddit.

screencapped cringe, fucking Rustfag

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-09-22 at 5.27.10 PM.png (806x186, 33K)

make sure you tag me in r/Jow Forums

If I have to use a deadlang, I'm going with Common Lisp.

Yes, I use Rust

Attached: BB4BE533-F39B-40EB-8EF2-CE1D26195606.png (460x460, 347K)

At least Common Lisp is useful, unlike Rust.
Programming in Rust is like getting your balls kicked every 30 minutes while eating solidified vomit.

Plox rewrite this codebase you've maintained for 20 years using C++ because this shit is hot right here.

No thanks. Not falling into the ruby mine.

"c-c++20 reeeee"
>Get BTFO
>w-we already have wide strings ree
lol for "expert C++ programmers", you don't seem to know what unicode handling is

sicp

Why yes I do use C, how could you tell?

Attached: leah0.jpg (300x300, 32K)

>intrinsically safe
LOL
>can't protect against memory leaks, which are considered safe by Rusthomos
>tags entirely valid and safe code as unsafe because the borrow checker model is brain dead
>variables can't be changed by default (const), forcing you to type more for the more common case.
>no standard, no stable compiler available
>absolutely toxic community filled with people who can't wait to genocide white males
>huge binaries and retarded compile-time optimization that can't beat C++

Attached: 1569191549145.png (550x520, 304K)

Why are you so butthurt upset about what other people code in? It is none of your business. Faggot

C++ and Rust are both wastes of time.
D is the language you both seek.

The fact that you don't know that C++ can support unicode is proof enough that you're a clueless Rustfag who learnt how to program in a code camp. Fucking web developers.

Why are you so mad dude geez

>This fag who used to post screencaps of his own Reddit posts on Jow Forums
Nice thread niggers

>Prove it can. where's the equivalent code?
Professional work isn't free. Unless you plan on sending some XMR to me, no dice.(Also not sure if this is against the rules to even request, but mods be kind.)

>43 posts in
>STILL no equivalent code to

Now THAT's what I call COPE
hahahahahahahahahahhaah*segmentation fault (core dumped)*

Call me when they remove the BC

>Checking whether a char exists and counting chars is """professional work"""
NO NONONONONONONOO HAHAHAHAHHAHA
COPING at the MAX

Based and redpilled.

>hasn't heard of u8"" string literals
Since C++11. Do you want me to show you how to do it in C++? This is a weird hill to die on you know.

Attached: 1569189238330.jpg (1920x1080, 228K)

>new = good
>old = bad

Use rust
woman > "wo"man

composition.al/about/

Attached: 0B8B8230-84E0-4AE1-8D8B-FC3FE9135138.jpg (400x400, 37K)

Fixed code literals != variable length chars
I want to see C++ handling variable length chars

Just use some unicode C++ library. Or make it yourself for internal use. Cunt.

but I make lots of money working on massive old c++ servers because I'm good at it

Mmhh
>reddit.com/user/bruce3434/comments

>Boost.text
Still experimental
Your best bet is ICU, hideous relic from the past

Are you saying that it can't be done or that it's annoying to do?

Leave an upvote, bro. Make sure you subscribe and follow too.

>I want to see something already supported before Rust existed
OK reddit faggot

#include
#include

int main()
{
std::wstring faggot = L"sauté";
std::wcout

Attached: cut-your-dick-off.png (994x570, 155K)

It can be done, but you have to write a ton of boilerplate to achieve the C++ (STL) way

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-09-23 10-47-42.png (444x186, 14K)

>actually reddit tranny here shilling his language
This must be why nothing useful is made in rust. They are too busy shilling.

>It can be done
>A lot of boiler plate
>Literally nothing but using wide characters
Seriously after how can you still post on here?

That's not variable length chars, that's fixed width. see

See the screenshot (u8 will be supported in C++20) and cut off your dick already.

>j-just wait for C++*shuffles deck*20!

>cut off your dick already.
zher doesn't have one, bruce3434 aka drag queen hour wyman, has already moved on from zher manhood.

>Haha C++ doesn't support unicode literals
>shows code that does
>that's not unicode! It has to be encoded in my autistic way
>shows standard now supports it
>haha, C++20!
kys

I don't use STL. What boilerplate are you talking about specifically? Unicode string implementation details?

You're just mad C++ doesn't support handling variable length string

Yes, something like to_lowercase/uppercase is not simple like shown in the example

>he thinks BC is bad

Attached: 1542629541458.png (1004x1000, 404K)

why did you replace the eszett

>mingw
found the problem

>boost::spirit

In the late 18th and early 19th century, when more and more German texts were printed in Roman type, typesetters looked for a Roman counterpart for the blackletter ſz ligature, which did not exist in Roman fonts. Printers experimented with various techniques, mostly replacing blackletter ß in Roman type with either sz, ss, ſs, or some combination of these.

For my use cases I don't care for now. I implemented a variable length string and I didn't find it too difficult to do. But I do agree it's a shame that it isn't supported at language level. Having said that I considered switching to Rust 2 years ago for several personal projects. Unfortunately I think its syntax inherits some of the worst parts of several other languages, mainly C++. Also these kinds of threads don't really help. But I enjoy the spergfest.

>BTFO by hetrosexual coder
>Still lingers around

>BTFO
lol where?

>shilling a non-POSIX lang

that is your reason for the program output?

No that's the historical reason for replacing ß

>"POSIX lang"

Attached: 1519264861280.png (645x729, 62K)

You know UTF-8 support is in Clang since 3.6?
>u8 character literals N4267 Clang 3.6
you're clueless

understandable. what is the reason for replacing it in the program output? simply how it was specced?

Is narrow string literal variable length character? No? Are you retarded?

No, it follows the historical reason.

>more modern
not a technical argument
>formal specification
cpp has informal spec, a formal spec looks like ALGOL68

Ignore bruce, he's just a troll. The original request was unicode handling, which even C++98 did just fine. He will move the goal posts to outerspace if it shows Rust is somehow relevant.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-09-22 at 6.15.14 PM.png (1032x284, 54K)

>Is narrow string literal variable length character
That's literally what u8 is you mongoloid.

Attached: mongo.png (2038x1000, 463K)

>namefag
>wojak poster
filtered

Are you trying to imply posix is actually good? Sad.

Tell me about D

Rustrannie will be obsolete on 2020

U8 is a fixed char, UTF-8 is variable.

Also, make sure you upvote :^)

>C++98
Not even C++20 supports unicode handling