Why does Brazilian portuguese sound nicer and clearer than Portuguese from Portugal

Why does Brazilian portuguese sound nicer and clearer than Portuguese from Portugal

Attached: Bratugal.jpg (2534x1655, 454K)

Sounds nicer and clearer because we open our mouths more and speak slower. I don't know why, maybe it's because the immigrants had to learn a language they never heard before so they speak clearer to each other

Cause hue language is "gay"

Actually, when Pedro discovered Brasil, the portuguese at that time was very similiar to Brasil accent. We speak a more old Portuguese than the Portuguese from Portugal.

Depends, Brazillians do not speak slower, it's us who speak very fast, at an eminem pace sometimes. This is a generalized problem that might explain the confusion.
We can't really say portuguese from Portugal vs portuguese from Brazil when comparing accents, because both countries have very different accents across their own regions.

I'll develop more assuming you're saying São Paulo accent vs Lisbon accent (not a great example, because there's many lisbon accents, but think standardized EU Portuguese)

The standardized version of Portuguese (EU) is still too hard to grasp in terms of vowels, we have one of the most complex vowel system in the whole Romance group, whereas BR Portuguese (this differs from the region, I'm thinking SP) uses the open vowels more often, like spanish, and it becomes a simple system, you'll never fail in pronouncing a word, there's not really much into it.
EU Portuguese abuses vowel reduction at an extreme, and it sounds kind of dark and depressing, somewhat formal when spoken clearly. It has to do with vowel reduction and such...

Also the consonants, mainly S, Z, X, are a shitfest in Portugal, don't even bother understanding, that's why it sounds russian sometimes.

Attached: 1451494370614.jpg (625x626, 109K)

Lusitanian Brothers, let us not say we are different people. We are one in the same, Brasil is Portugal, Timor is Portugal, Angola is Portugal. VIVA A PORTUGALIDADE

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 117K)

Attached: index.png (225x225, 3K)

Denis Russo Burgierman

Se é que Cabral gritou alguma coisa quando avistou os contornos do Monte Pascoal, certamente não foi “terra ã vishta”, assim com o “a” abafado e o “s” chiado que associamos ao sotaque português. No século XVI, nossos primos lusos não engoliam vogais nem chiavam nas consoantes – essas modas surgiram no século XVII. Cabral teria berrado um “a” bem pronunciado e dito “vista” com o “s” sibilante igual ao dos paulistas de hoje. Na verdade, nós, brasileiros, mantivemos os sons que viraram arcaísmos empoeirados para os portugueses.

Só que, ao mesmo tempo, acrescentamos à língua mãe nossas próprias inovações. Demos a ela um ritmo roubado dos índios, introduzimos subversões à gramática herdadas dos escravos negros e temperamos com os sotaques de milhões de imigrantes europeus e asiáticos. Deu algo esquisito: um arcaísmo moderno.

O português brasileiro levou meio milênio se desenvolvendo longe de Portugal até ficar nitidamente diferente. Mas ainda é quase desconhecido. Até os anos 90, os lingüistas pouco sabiam sobre a história da língua, sobre nosso jeito de falar e as diferenças regionais dentro do Brasil

Niggers