Well lads, having had this taken away from us at birth and never knowing what it was to have pleasure, I've finally decided to restore my foreskin. I will periodically keep you all updated.
Here is the article from which I decided to use ball bearings, attach what remains of my foreskin to it, and then use the weight (7 oz) to put pressure on my skin and induce mitosis.
Pic related is my cock today, 2/21/19.
Wish me luck and best of luck to others that want to partake.
>can calluses go away? yes. And I'd rather restore what's left and at least have my glans protected.
Lincoln Miller
>Jews took my foreskin >I'll pay them, to get it back
Jackson James
Last comment, because I'm dressed now. I'm going to buy some ball bearings and tape, roll what remains of my foreskin onto a ball bearing, attach a weight to it, and allow mitosis to do it's work. Not much money, and will get the job done. Read the article you fucking mong.
Luke Bailey
Did your legs run off with your ass?
Christian Reyes
ok keep your penis out of here wtf dude cant you jist keep that to yourself? sage
Xavier Walker
>stinky >smegma >anteater >repulses both men and women alike
No women will ever want to suck it faggot
Christopher Powell
You need to shave nigger and don't do this ball torture shit to your dick don't be a faggot
Parker White
>tape you already fucked up >how you'll see
Carson Hernandez
God damn bro. I hope for your own good that you're a grower, not a shower. That dick is small as fuck. Also, typical mutt skin color.
3/10
Chase Davis
The Jews of Jow Forums will criticize and disparage you but I want to congratulate you for making the best of a bad situation
Matthew Butler
Shower and retract when necessary. Problem solved. Now you don't need to mutilate babies and have a worthless stump with no sensitivity and 50 years worth of lotion which likely contains other babies foreskins.
Restoring can work on loose circumcisions. It takes a long time but the shaft skin eventually grows long enough to replace your stolen foreskin. The tight cutfags are royally screwed, though. With skin too tight and nothing to grab onto, restoring doesnt work on them.
Isaiah Clark
I'd be worried about complications and would consult a doctor. Its like bottom surgery but not as bad. Would my life change in any way if I tried to stretch my dick skin? doubt it
Jose Gomez
this guy has the right idea, I'd trust evolution more than 21-century doctors
Ryan Wood
If you follow through with it and keep posting, you'll inspire me to do the same.
Owen Foster
would be helpful if this no sensitivity meme was actually true, don't know what that lotion bit is about tho
Nathaniel Campbell
Lmau imptrash
Jonathan Miller
>implying you can't just wash it normally like every other body part when ur in the shower
can't belive had dumb americans are
Jaxson Price
can you answer why europeans are so obsessed with american penises? its really confusing to me.
yeah you constantly make threads about american dicks, american circumscision, american foreskins etc. its kind of disturbing
Daniel Phillips
I just don't though
Noah Gomez
This was made by an american tho lul
Hudson Robinson
yeah but he only made it because of the misguided attempts to win european approvement. a majority of these threads are made by europeans and occasionally australians. why are you so obsessed?
Probably because they aren't dicklets who have all their sensation and can't figure out why you all blindly follow the kike manifesto? IDK.
I also don't understand why Africoons lob off their niglet daughters clits either but this is the pozzed world we live in
Noah Sanders
it has objectively proven to lower the rate of penile cancers and infections tho and some studies and even shown that it doesnt reduce sensitivity. >just clean it lol we all know u fags are spreading your smega on crackers and bread go back to Jow Forums you cock obsessed retard
thats not even a comparable instance. also youre just gonna ignore the fact that it doesnt lower sensitivity? your ilk loves to talk shit about americans being ignorant but you clearly rely on shit infographs as your main source of info
How is it not comparable when you cited penile cancer yourself? lmao
>Muh sensitivity is the same! Implying removing over 20,000 nerve endings (the clit has 8000 by the way) doesn't affect sensitivity and enjoyment. I mean, are you that functionally retarded that you think removing something that's designed to be there isn't going to create all kinds of functionality issues?
The infographs are all thoroughly researched using establish medical science, it just sums up the points to make it more palatable to American brains.
this has citations at the bottom back by universities. your infograph doesnt. fuck off faggot
Aaron Smith
I can't even wrap my head around the fact that there are people retarded enough to believe circumcision is good. Just look at how dried out and disgusting your penis looks compared to an intact penis.
There are other places for STDs to be absorbed into the body, shitforbrains.
Sebastian Moore
I'd rather suck a cut dick than a uncut. Looks way better without.
Eli Cook
its called mitagation dumbfuck. its not gonna magically protect you 100% its taking a step to reduce risk. you get hung up on one thing and you just sound like a retard just like your buttbuddy
Ryder Hernandez
Two citations of the sub Saharan trials which were debunked and one by circumfetishist Brian Morris (who isn't even a doctor). Wow. Also those African trials found that FGM has positive benefits too, so I hope you'll be a good goy and cut your daughters clit circumstitions.com/morris.html
also some of your sources aren't even doctors of urology either (ie Darcia F. Narvaez) auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080 another modern study countering your claim and all 3 have authority on human sexual sensitivity and since you want to be a pedantic retard this article blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2016/04/22/circumcision-and-sexual-function-bad-science-reporting-misleads-parents/ (comes from the huff post ironic for you Jow Forumstard) this guy isnt a scientist or doctor for urology or anything of the sort, he's an ethiticist. i will admit he does have some sources but going on your flawed logic he'd should be disregarded. i dont have a real stake in the issue of circumcized vs uncircumsized but stop trying to act as if those who undergoe it are fucking crippled for life or something or are somehow subhuman.