Have you ever thought there's an infinite number of yous living in a parallel dimension...

hmmmm, imagine kissing her

>going through the same situations
if time is infinite, then there are infinite Yous going through infinite sorts of experiences and scenarios simultaneously. What this particular You has to come to terms with is the understanding that those Yous are not this You. Be happy that others Yous are living well, and dismiss the Yous that are being rude, useless, evil, etc.
It's very cathartic.

That chick looks like me so I think I may be lucky.

WHy do red headed woman look better than all other types. :)

>Bluewhateverthefuck
Im going hoe hunting.

retarded fucks

this universe is a closed one you faggit, space has a limit, time as a concept is made up by sentients

she would be too busy sucking this bbc

because they are user

Okay Mehmet, the bible is the truth it's the inspired words of our Lord and unlike your Koran is not filled with contradictions

The Limit of Space (the Second Heaven) is the Kingdom of Heaven (the Third Heaven) the first Heaven is the sky (the Firament)

Yes that is a legitimate theory in science. Somewhere there is a victorious national socialist Germany, imagine that

Yes. I hope to keep that in mind when I die.

Attached: kek.png (553x602, 539K)

have you ever thought of being gay and sucking dick

Attached: 94f.jpg (800x450, 101K)

Attached: hb.jpg (1080x568, 30K)

>Space is infinite
>[citation needed]
>time might be it as well
>[citation needed]
sounds like someone's been reading a bit too much popsci and taking it to heart
go get a degree in physics/math/etc then we can talk about popsci shit

Conciously, cancel those parallel lives. They are sucking energy. LEARN TO FORGET. Btw, this is x.

I can feel the collective feels
I don’t know how
It just do

I bet that tongue could do some mean rimming.
Don't ask me how I know this, but getting your bootyhole licked feels good man.

There is no such thing as multiple dimensions. It's a thing Hollywood came up with because 14 billion years isn't enough time for life to form by accident or for evolution to happen.

Multiverse theories aren't theories - they're science fictions, theologies, works of the imagination unconstrained by evidence.

>When I was a young adult, I thoroughly enjoyed watching Carl Sagan's Cosmos specials on PBS. Sagan had a way to make cosmology interesting even to biologists. I waited all week to watch his program. Later, in his Gifford lectures, Carl Sagan talked about how to test religious truth claims:

>"Now, what happened before that [Big-Bang]? There are two views. One is 'Don't ask that question,' which is very close to saying that God did it. And the other is that we live in an oscillating universe in which there is an infinite number of expansions and contractions. The former of these views happens, by chance, to be close to the Judeo-Christian-Islamic view, the latter, close to the standard Hindu views. And so, if you like, you can think of the varying contentions of these two major religious views being fought out in the field of contemporary satellite astronomy. Because that's where the answer to this question will very likely be decided. This is an experimental question. And it is very likely that in our lifetime we will have the answer to it. And I stress that this is very different from the usual theological approach, where there is never an experiment that can be performed to test out any contentious issue. Here there is one. So we don't have to make judgments now. All we have to do is maintain some tolerance for ambiguity until the data are in, which may happen in a decade or less." (Carl Sagan, 1985 Gifford Lectures).

(1/2)

Attached: +_296ccf4f7fc7779e4d42072b7590e467.jpg (1000x1000, 259K)

have you ever had my ass faggot jump off a cliff

>Guess what? Sagan was right. Sagan's second alternative, the oscillating universe model has been discredited by a lack of sufficient matter to cause a contraction. It was further discredited by the discovery of dark energy, which shows that the universe is actually expanding at an ever increasing rate. So, Sagan's first alternative is the one that turned out to be true. My guess is that he was betting on the second. Of course, the atheists haven't lined up to become Christians, but instead have invented their own form of metaphysics (i.e., religion). Atheists have invented the multiverse, a kind of super-universe that randomly spews out other universes (with differing physical laws) at will. The multiverse sounds scientific, but it is really philosophical wishful thinking, since there is no evidence supporting the idea. If one really thinks about it, the multiverse is impossible over the entire period of eternity (which is what atheists would propose for the age of the "invisible" part of our universe - if such a thing exists at all). The problem is that our part of the multiverse has managed to make itself completely inaccessible to contraction and future expansion. If it were possible for one part of the multiverse to become thermodynamically dead, it would be expected to be possible for others. Even if entry into such a state is extremely unlikely, eternity is a very, very long time. Certainly by now (over all eternity), the entire multiverse would have entered into one of these thermodynamically dead zones. So, one would expect the entire multiverse to have suffered thermodynamic death by now. Therefore, it makes absolutely no sense that the universe is eternal with the characteristics that we observe. We are left with Sagan's first alternative - God did it. Atheists like to say that there is no evidence for God's existence and pretend such evidence doesn't exist. However, Sagan realized that science could judge between religious claims.

(2/2)