Quite curious, it's like most on Jow Forums never finished school or studied biology. Instead just mixed their own daddy's redneck teachings with some stuff they found here on Jow Forums and formed their ideas of race (which basically mirror Jim Crow or 17th century European delusions about race).
The irony here is that users actually think that what they believe in is scientific and is current. It reminds me of the flat earth forum and how users on there also believe that science supports them, it appears that huge amounts of time in an echo chamber make you guys lose touch of what the current positions even are. lol
Prove your point, emotional arguments only work with women.
Anthony Long
Very old outdated crap, before proper science came along is thrown around on Jow Forums here a lot. It also teaches some naive and uneducated people to adopt those beliefs. < similar to that picture and stuff of that time. Things which are totally unscientific, but most users on here are susceptible as they have no scientific education to deduce old pseudo-science BS.
It's similar to how the flat earth forums post post century old text with very poor science and try to point to areas to insist the earth is flat. It's very piss poor, it's sad to know there are communities of dumb fucks who literally resurrect debunked BS and then live by it.
Can guarantee that women are more logical than you, a literal low IQ 4channer from a shithole country.
Dominic Diaz
The racial ideas of Jow Forums users are typically composed of literal Jim Crow era beliefs. Which probably came about by many of the republican users on here being raised by their fathers in that environment.
The Jim Crow beliefs were not independently created in America, instead it was a legacy the Europeans who colonised America brought over. Of course Europeans today accept that these ideas are not only unscientific, but that they border on religious beliefs in their nature.
But many Americans in the south (especially Trump voters) are still living til this day with 17th century racial theories in their mind.
I am well aware most on here think global warming is a hoax created by the Chinese (Donald Trump believes this also, or at least pretended to, in order to cater to republican rednecks).
Think I give a fuck? Barely much changes, what do the liberals do? Jack shit, what does labor do? Jack shit.
The Greens would do stuff if they ever got in, but I think they are too radical and would actually cause the country to collapse. Their heart is in the right place in many areas, but their brain and practicality is totally out there on many things.
Justin Baker
What drives you to post your meme pictures? I am curious, it's a sign of autism to try to communicate your emotions via cartoon pictures which you want to live vicariously though instead of normal communication methods. Forgive me, seek help.
Jaxon Martinez
Ok, but add it to your future threads, also add the JQ and how its a "conspiracy theory" etc etc.
Another study with a similar result: >Evidence for Bias of Genetic Ancestry in Resting State Functional MRI
>Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is a popular imaging modality for mapping the functional connectivity of the brain. Rs-fMRI is, just like other neuroimaging modalities, subject to a series of technical and subject level biases that change the inferred connectivity pattern. In this work we predicted genetic ancestry from rs-fMRI connectivity data at very high performance (area under the ROC curve of 0.93). Thereby, we demonstrated that genetic ancestry is encoded in the functional connectivity pattern of the brain at rest. Consequently, genetic ancestry constitutes a bias that should be accounted for in the analysis of rs-fMRI data. biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/440776v1
WTF is that? There are like 25 million Australians bro, that isn't me.
I agree with his points though, black dick is bigger and that for some reason really pisses off Jow Forums people a lot, which is hilarious.
Matthew Cook
>muh dog breed. Which are artificial creations, not via evolution. Go back to school.
Jordan Hall
>WTF is that? There are like 25 million Australians bro, that isn't me. AHAHAHAHA. Yes it is. You used to post this exact thread multiple times a day, everyday, a few months back. Example:
Black dick is bigger ..diffrence in race and genetics...blacks having bigger dicks is not a social construct...sage
Isaiah Smith
>Fuck tucker Yet you dumbasses love him and treat him as if he is a super scientist like Bill Nye.
Liam Richardson
The three major races lived in completely different environments. Dog breeds were just proof signifcant genetic change can happen in a short period of time.
Camden Taylor
There is a reason you don't work for the police as a profiler, you are the type of idiot who would come to the conclusion that most people on a website are the same person. lol
Logan Bailey
Bill nye scientist..holy shit..just quit humiliating yourself
I never said certain biological differences don't exist, blacks typically are taller if fed properly and have more straight femur bones and can run faster and have longer arms also.
Yes, traits exist in different populations. But the 17th century racial ideas created in Europe are unscientific and so is the Jim Crow BS (yet these are what the majority of Jow Forums tards live their life by).
>he is a super scientist like Bill Nye. Interesting phrase to use. >If race exists (which is the belief of race realists on Jow Forums and stormfront) then why do super scientists and intellectual titans all explain quite clearly how race doesn't exist? archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/204577145/#q204577145 And you deny that you're not the same person. HAHAHA, fagggot.
No one here believes in "17th century racial ideas". You might as well say evolution isn't true because of misunderstanding or outright fraud which has occurred in the past. It's idiotic.
Alexander Sullivan
If all races were one at point then certain people had different ideas and went to different places eventually becoming different peoples entirely.
This Humanity United nonses is childish.
Chase King
Ahhh this thread again. OP you got BTFO'd last time and didn't even respond to half the posts including mine so why start another thread? Anyway here I go again.
Race exists and is biologically real. P1) There are differences in patterns of visible physical features which correspond to geographic ancestry P2) These patterns are exhibited between real groups, existing groups (i.e., individuals who share common ancestry) P3) These real, existing groups that exhibit these physical patterns by geographic ancestry satisfy the conditions of minimalist race C) Therefore race exists and is a biological reality
Previous fst estimates under evaluated differentiation in human pops. New calcs show that human differences may rise to the classification of separate species. biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/653279v1
The data on racial differenceces in dick size is awefull actually.
Ethan Gonzalez
The 17th century racial ideas created by state nationalists in Europe were not backed by genetics you low IQ fuck.
Genetic testing which was possible centuries later actually put those unscientific delusions to bed, except for dumbass republicans who are uneducated and still live by Jim Crow BS.
Camden Wright
You are a moron, even shitty animals with IQ's of like 5 spread over the continents to different areas.
Aaron Jones
>Genetic testing which was possible centuries later actually put those unscientific delusions to bed
Nope actually modern science has pretty much confirmed old timey concepts of race like caucasoid mongoloid australoid etc. See Rosenberg's findings of race. racerosenberglab.stanford.edu/papers/popstruct.pdf
Jordan James
>We believe in 21st century racial ideas..........
Oh boy, if you actually went to school and studied biology then you would know there is a huge difference between Jim Crow/old Europe ideas and modern science in regards to population genetics and race.
Race isn't even a taxonomic rank, nor does it objectively exist (unlike sex). Sorry, pick up a textbook and start learning, instead of living in an echo chamber of rednecks on Jow Forums.
Bentley Price
Yes... and? Animals also diverge varyingly. Just look at dogs.
Caleb Sanders
tranny shills from discord out in full force today
James Nguyen
>Oh boy, if you actually went to school and studied biology then you would know there is a huge difference between Jim Crow/old Europe ideas and modern science in regards to population genetics and race.
>user states we don't believe in 17th century racial ideas >user responds by ridiculing user for believing in 17th century racial ideas
Just stop dude. You've been exposed a terrible troll.
What you're saying is a nonargument. It doesn't matter if concepts of race have changed over time or not. This is the same with any scientific postulate. And the fact that race may or may not rise to the some taxanomic rank like subspecies or species (which it can very well do of you look at fst values) it doesn't invalidate it either.
Genetic testing shows that the difference between pre-invented groups is very small, where as 17th century racial ideas said that Africans were half ape and not even proper humans (and thus it was fine to enslave them as the bible didn't apply to them when it talked about "man").
Genetic testing showed that there are many ethnic groups with a lot of genetic variation and each have a complex origin, unlike the ideas of 17th century Europe which made 3 "races" that sprung into existence independently and that all other groups are a mixing between them.
Genetic testing shows that all groups descend from Africa, 17th century racial ideas postulated that each area people exist in is where they have always existed and where god created them. Meaning that Europeans arose in Europe from people that have been there forever and have nothing to do with Africa, if this is sounding very nationalistic then don't be shocked (as these original racial ideas were not in the field of science, but instead state nationalism).
The original 17th century racial ideas claimed that Europeans are white and are close to god and have souls, and that other groups are more akin to animals (at this point the idea that humans are also animals was considered preposterous to Christian Europe).
The original 17th century racial ideas would literally find bumps and contours on peoples heads and claim they could determine their personality and intelligence based on that (this is also listed as a pseudoscience today).
Yet all of these unscientific things are what redneck Jow Forums users live by. Pretty much any actual modern educational fact regarding population genetics is foreign to Jow Forums tards. Instead we are talking about the spawn of Jim Crow rednecks here. sorry
Race wasn't a scientific concept your dumbass, it was a state nationalist based concept which was devised as a means to spread nationalism in 17th century Europe.
The founders of the theories were not scientists, nor were their ideas scientific. They were imaginations pulled out of their literal asses.
Eli Roberts
And no amount of meme pictures you saved to your little computer is going to make reality change in favour of your uneducated desires, sorry.
I'd like to know aswell but OP doesn't seem to have any arguments. People who accept race but argue there aren't any meaningful cognitive differenceces are delusional but they still make more sense than OP. I call them secular creationists because they basically think the human brain was magically uneffected by selective pressures starting 150k years ago or that all races magically converged on the same genetic potential for iq in the 21st century. OP however I don't know what to call because he's trying to claim that race or genetic structure to human pops don't exist. Which isn't even something a creationist would argue for so idk.
>Tfw you have to show pics of African albino mutts to prove that white race are ugly. I guess even blacks recognize that the ugliest people are in their race.
Cooper Collins
>We're all the same, and diversity is our strength It's too late for you now.
Ok hear me out on this one. What if we could all agree that races exist BUT - this is the twist - we could STILL disagree on if that means we should have different laws/rules etc for different races?
Eli Torres
This is caricature from satirical journal.
Carter Stewart
>We are all humans
Some humans contribute, others don't.
Robert Morris
Bill nye butt stuff guy
Daniel Brooks
I believe his argument will be that genetic variation between two randomly selected individuals within a race is as great as between two randoms from different races. Which is a point. That doesn’t, however invalidate the genetic fact of racial clusters. That’s a counter point. My take is that both points are valid, in that they both describe genetic facts. So if you want to derive a political point from genetics, you have to take both those facts into account.
Hunter Williams
Sure but that argument is also true of humans +chimps. There's more variation within humans than there is between humans and chimps. It just isn't a particularly salient point to make.
Adam Fisher
Been a minority my whole life.. so ready to live around nothing but white folks and never see a nig or spic again.. asians are cool
Its incredibly sad that you reddit fags all unironically put Bill Nye in these cringeposts
Nathaniel Morris
DNA literally shows us the exact differences now.
As DNA research becomes more advanced we learn more and more about which differences in allele expression result in what morphological and physio-biological differences.
But hey, don't believe there is ANY difference. Go live in Haiti or Congo you hypocritical, faggot coward.
James Taylor
the nigger-nosed "European male" in your pic is Russian. here's an actual European albino
