>epstein didnt had any brides
>Yeah I’m sure they were given happy weddings and led a life where they were respected and treated with dignity.
>You do know there’s a difference between child bride and sex slave... right?
In Devarim, and elsewhere in the Torah, the word white people have translated as "wife" is simply the hebrew word for female. Likewise the word white people have chosen to translate into "husband" are the hebrew word for man, and the hebrew word for master (ba'al).
In YHWH's Law, there is spoken simply of a man who has females, who is master of females, and females who have a master.
Is that not liguistically similar to Epstein's situation.
YHWH did not declare the woman as master of the man, nor did he declare her as equal. The man is master of the female.
Perhaps this is why Epstein did not feel he was doing anything wrong: the Torah does not prevent a master with multiple subordinates.
Epstein and white men have diametrically opposed religions. Epstein's god was YHWH, we might assume. White men's god is woman.
Leviticus does tell the fathers that it is targeted at not to sell their daughters into prostitution, however.
White men would happily slaughter a man with a young girl bride, just as quickly as any other "chomo": many joined the campaigns in the desert for that very reason
>YHWH allows men to marry girl children, including in cases of rape (tahpahs) in Devarim chapter 22, verse 28: na'ar (child: hebrew masoretic text), padia (child: greek septuagint), puella (young girl: latin vulgate).