Why are they so irrelevant?

>pls elaborate on that
Na I tried to quit smoking and failed. So I asked him and 10k was the smallest bill I had.

>one time in 23 years
>no time in 28 years

Still have right.

Blaming colonazation seems stupid when you wouldn't exist without it. Britain sent convicts to Australia too and they are doing very well despite living on an isolated desert island

>literally the most relevant continent in terms of /sp/
>he doesn't even browse /sp/

Attached: 152125164496.jpg (399x400, 20K)

Sadly I'm wrong to blame colonization as a whole. Colonization of exploration its the problem. Colonization to inhabit,to populate,wouldn't cause so much harm. Just take a look at U.S.A and Latin America,two kinds of colonization,two results.

Australia is considered to be the Brazil that gone right,why that I don't know,correct me if I'm wrong,but Britain only sent the convicts,they didn't explore the land and did slavery
If I'm wrong correct me,I really don't know about Australia

Hi

yeah because south america is all about argentina

you fool

typical non white.

what did spain took exactly? gold is irrelevant.

They grabbed the Argentinian castles and took them to Spain.

We are not that irrelevant
Most people can name at least 5 or even 10 south american countries, which they cant do for the middle east, southeast asia, oceania or the whole sub saharan africa

Hell I would say that we are the 3rd most relevant landmass after europe, east asia and the levant

Every single country in latam aside from centracas, bolivia, ecuador and paraguay has carved a name for themselves