>Bitcoin Cash supporters have already won
>We have a coin that can actually be used to make purchases as good as cash
>BCH is exactly how Bitcoin worked before Blockstream came along with their Segbullshit 2nd layer crap solutions
>BCH is gaining more and more adoption every day
>Only day-traders and hodling gamblers care about price (which has been falling since BTC shit itself during prime time with 1MB blocks)
>Bitcoin Cash actually works for buying things
>Have fun figuring out how to open a lightning channel, paying high fees, and losing your funds if you aren't online.
>We already got what we want.
>You've got a pile of unusable Blockstream shit.
>Time is on our side
>We get to watch BTC die a slow painful death
>We get to watch to guys get triggered and cry "Bcash!" every time Roger Ver wrecks one of you retarded pussy faggots in a debate
What BTC Core cuked faggots fail to understand
Other urls found in this thread:
reddit.com
youtu.be
cointelegraph.com
bitcoinabc.org
coingeek.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Yep and nobody gives a fuck buddy.
>replied to acknowledge you dont care
ETH
>paying fees for transactions in 2018
???
You and your kind are dying a slow death. Watching you squirm and struggle in desperation is enjoyable.
>bcash
are there actually people who didn't immediately exchange their BCH for BTC at the fork amazing
What part of nobody did you not understand brainlet?
I'll pay $10 in ETH to anyone who can provide a technical rebuttal.
I'd love to see the statistics of actual dollars used to purchase Bitcoin versus actual dollars used to purchase Bcash. I'd be shocked if Bcash has had $1 million actual dollars put into it versus meme money power play.
Bcash holding is so highly concentrated, there can be very much actually money put into it. Anyone with real money would have already been holding Bitcoin and got their coins for free.
As far as usage, there are probably more vendors that accept Bitcoin than the total number of goods actually purchased with Bcash.
That said, it sure is fun watching cashies get BTFO not knowing they were used to propagate a ponzi scheme just so criminals could try to highjack Bitcoin.
There is zero chance people that actually believe in the concept of decentralized money could ever support Bcash. They'd quit crypto entirely before that.
>still replying to a thread he claims no one cares about
Just kys already kek
Another month of the slow bleed they might be begging for cash to take the lead, anything to pull the market away from core's spiral down
And yet here you are trying to affirm your delusions
Enjoy those bags
A technical rebuttal to opinions of a cringe lord cuck poster? Lmao no thanks
But BCH has been bleeding too
Satoshi is so wise. He could pull the rug out from under BTC anytime he wants but he knows it is smarter to let it slowly die on its own and give people a chance to flee to BCH.
Well Dave Kleiman is more than likely a bigger part of who Satoshi is, with Craig Wright being a partner.
reddit.com
an unalterable, encrypted audit log system = what a blockchain is. Craig with the economics and financial side while Kleiman programmed the security and encryption aspects of bitcoin.
I'm down a good bit on my BCH investment but I have been buying more with every dip and lowering by avg buy in price. I'm either going to crash and burn or be rich as fuck. At least I actually believe in the tech. Lightning Network is hot garbage.
BCH to $8750000 eoy
We all know you work at McDonalds buddy.
BCash is a centralized shitcoin you retard
Why do you post this? Are you paid?
You have a really low IQ if you actually believe this
If you think the act of creating Bitcoin is one of "programming" then you clearly have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Bitcoin was a fundamentally mathematical invention.
To prove me wrong you have to post, in your own words, an explanation of how Bitcoin works. I know you won't because you're a sheep
Hold till may
youtu.be
>price event
cointelegraph.com
>published in november
bitcoinabc.org
>32 MB blocks
coingeek.com
>owned by calvin ayre, 3 days after hardfork
Oh "Satoshi"?
You mean Fauxtoshi?
That guy who on twitter insulted someome half his age with Beavis (misspelling Beavis, posting a pic of Butthead)?
Yes. So wise. Noble even.
Wow, posting a video about something completely related to the discussion at hand, which itself is a LITERAL piece of propaganda sponsored by Roger Ver and Co.
If you think posting a link to this retarded shit is an argument you're mistaken. Explain to me how Lightning Network works, right now, in TECHNICAL TERMS not metaphors, or else you admit that you're just a shill.
>completely related
Completely unrelated*
Nobody cares about the fucking nodes, they don't matter. What matters is the miners.
>He doesn't understand how the protocol maintains decentralization: the post
>maybe if I just spam buzzwords like decentralization people will agree with me
Nobody cares, loser. Bitcoin is going to lose its market dominance and it's because of you corecucks. Enjoy it when a superior coin takes it over. You're getting replaced.
>fundamentally mathematical invention
Do you think JN was involved?
>BCash is going to overtake Bitcoin, says an increasingly nervous VerCuck for the 17th time this year
You're worse than the ETH "flippening"ers
>mentioning bitcoin cash when I never mentioned it
Talk about rent free. You're getting replaced, loser.
Protocols only mentions miners. Saying non-mining nodes contribute to bitcoin is like saying you contribute to torrents by downloading them
Stunning ignorance from a normal man;
just another day at work for a cashie
>Protocols only mentions miners
He's right. Nodes don't do anything but verify. It's full nodes that matters, and full nodes MINE.
youtube.com
>3:45
He's right but you're actually a fucking retarded brainlet. It's okay to like bitcoin because you want the price to go up, but it's not okay to be a retard and pretend to know how it works on the technical side when you don't.
based op.
retard
You do realize that your point is weakened by citing Mr Ruseman, don't you?
Craig wright BTFOing bcore fags
His point is weakend because hss conflating light nodes with full nodes because hes a fucking brainlet
Everyone who keeps saying bitcoin cash is centralized because of node count should just watch this:
t. you
Everyday until Bitcoin dies.
Just wait for May 15th hardfork. BCH will start to slowly eat into ICO platforms :)
lmao user what do you think t. means?
bgone btrash
im not a core cuck but i cant stand that shitcoin. it needs to die
"Bcash" is Bitcoin you fucking retard. That's what you guys aren't understanding. BCH is the Bitcoin community telling Blockstream "fuck your changes, we don't want them. Segwit is garbage, Lightning is garbage. All we needed to do was open the blocks". Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin with bigger blocks. That's all. When Bitcoin started blocks were 32MB. BTC Core is some fucked up 1MB capped segwit 2nd layer lightning shit experiment. And no one wants to use it for anything other than speculation, because the fees are ridiculous and it can't handle a high transaction load
SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT SATOSHI IMPLEMENTED THE BLOCK SIZE LIMIT
>Still relying on the fake Bitcoin Cash
Bcash is a fork of Bitcoin. It isnt Bitcoin. Sorry not sorry but you gotta deal with this fact.
Bitcoin is a fork of Bitcoin
>round and round we go, the Core cuck merry-go-round of tortured logic, lies, and delusions
"It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don’t have it are already obsolete."
-Satoshi
segwit is a fork of bitcoin.
soft fork as it is because if they had it as a hard fork, it would have been "contentious" and never passed. So they made it "optional" and then started boycotting everyone not using it.
do these tactics remind you of any other sphere of politics or finance?
He's saying how it could be technically done, he didn't say "this is the final scaling solution of Bitcoin and block size doesn't matter"
Refute this CashCuck
What coin is in my wallet from 2010? BTC or BCH?
I can't decide if it's sad or funny, that week after week, month after month, the best bcore can come up with is ad hominem and the desperate inciting of tribalism.
These arguments are actually negative gamma, you realise? Which is to say actually they're positive gamma which in turn has a negative effect, because negative gamma is definitionally incoherent.
Every time I read something to the effect of "bcash btrash lol cashies btfo zomg so dum" all I am reminded of is high school fuckwits.
Is that really all that's left in the bcore camp? I get the sense I could defend their position more effectively than they do. That samson mow debate was just fucking embarrassing.
Hey user, both BTC and BCH are in it. You have to transfer the BTC to a new BTC wallet, then import that old now-empty BTC wallet into BCH wallet software, and it will also contain the equivalent amount of BCH
Remember, you have to transfer out the BTC first so a malicious BCH wallet can't steal your BTC.
Wrong. Its a trick question. No coins are in my old wallet.
EDIT: Oh I see you meant that as a rhetorical point to argue against him and claim that BCH isn't the real Bitcoin. Technically your argument is incorrect, but you're still right - BTC is the real Bitcoin - but not for that reason. The real reason is because BTC has the longest PoW chain. This is how Satoshi defined it in the whitepaper and it's fundamentally the most important consensus rule. So BCH truly cannot claim to be Bitcoin because it is NOT the longest PoW chain, it is a fork with a smaller PoW chain and as such is not Bitcoin, by the very definition of Bitcoin that Satoshi laid out
Try and find one early adopter that doesn't have developer ties to bcash that actually supports it. I'll be waiting.
and something bcash followers don't want to hear, is that if it wasn't for them directly undoing satoshi's work, bcash wouldn't even exist, because satoshi's protection against minority forks like bcash would have prevented it from being mineable.
but of course, because bcash was a miner created coin, they undid satoshi's work so they could profit from it like any other altcoin.
Its like people arguing about who has the fastest donkey when cars exist.
>It's another "retard thinks centralized shitcoins with low block mining times are good alternatives to Bitcoin because they (((scale more))) due to this centralization" episode
no he is saying light nodes don't matter
can you explain why non-mining nodes do matter?
>ying how it could be technically done, he didn't say "this is the final scaling solution of Bitcoin and block size doesn't matter"
>Refute this CashCuck
you had both in the same wallet in the same amounts after august obviously.
Propaganda that is true lulz. You like this next one...
Some of your biggest supporters, Tone Vays, don't even know they need to run a full node @40:04 lulz
Core's retardation is mooning to ATH's! lulz
only worthwhile non-btc coin is ZIL because of this.
It still runs into hardware problems because of memory requirements like btc does with increasing block size.
In a world with no hardware limits increasing block size is a superior scaling solution to 2nd layer options like Lightning. This means that in time we will come full circle with scaling solutions. When hardware reaches the point where using distributed ledgers is as fast and trivially easy as using an SQL database is today and faster the true potential of this tech will be brought forward.
Roger is Satoshi, pic related
Someone post the video from last night. I want to watch roger wrecking that core shill one mo time!
HAHAHAHAHHAH BCASH BCASH BCASH BCASH LOOOLL LMFAO AJAJAJJAJAJ
You're right, Craig put it in place back when transferring BTC cost basically nothing, in order to prevent spam. It was always meant to be temporary
https:// youtu.be/MsvOTXHG4Xk
What is it with bcore and fucking hats, anyway?
Why specifically bitcoin ABC nodes?
We also have these following nodes:
Bitcoin Unlimited, Bitcoinxt, Parity Bitcoin, Bitprim and Flowee.
Fun fact: the cost of spamming the network grows exponentially with the block size limit. Corecucks accused minners of spamming the network and instead of implementing the straightforward solution decided to pay trolls to spam all the main forums.
>Bcash
lot of people dont realise roger is completely right about the babies, if you think its a cringey overstatement it means you dont understand how central banks financially repress people
All war, poverty and degeneration of society is caused by currency debasement. Bitcoin before blockstream destroted it was the first invention that can make people immune to keynesian money printing
If you are a paid shill you are selling out your family and future generations for trivial short term gain. Whatever you receive to shill against decentralised peer to peer cash is nothing compared to the wealth you would have if we had worldwide adoption. Its subhuman to do anything to stop the adoption of crypto
shhh, I'm accumulating here
>Jow Forumsbtc/
>10k by may
Are cashies this delusional?
BTC fees are lower than btrash fees. SegWit and lightning are better solutions to scaling than increasing block size.
>Be a good goy and hadle your full validating nodes to us
>t. PsyOPS Wright
Your POS shitcoin cannot even beat litecoin. Give up you inarticulate swine.
your meme is shit and you should feel bad for posting it.
Is this how you cope?
lol bcashies, the solution is in alternative coins, not your trash coin that is the same obsolete shit
>muh nodes
this isn't r/bitcoin you are going to get ass-raped like your friend mow
If core were following Satoshi's scaling plan instead of force feeding the corruption of privileging Blockstream's business plan over everyone else in the ecosystem, this might have a point As it stands though, core effectively killed the real Bitcoin, and any means necessary to destroy them was justified.