Nano holders must realize Nano doesn't solve any real issues
Nano holders must realize value in crypto comes not from shiny bells and whistles
Nano holders must realize value in crypto comes from the networks
Nano holders must realize no one cares about instant transaction speeds and low fees.
No company big enough to need that will touch block chain tech. They will stick to the established methods.
Meanwhile your mom and pop sandwich shop will have no issue using nano to drum up more business
>Nano holders must realize no one cares about instant transaction speeds and low fees.
Literally anyone buying or selling anything wants to avoid extra fees and have it happen quickly.
That doesn't matter if Nano isn't on many exchanges. What good are those transaction speeds etc. if it's only on Binance?
Sleeping fucking giant, you should hold a little of this just in case.
When and if it does moon , it will moon hard.
>low fees.
Also to stress the point, Nano has NO fees for the user. The proof of work it uses doesn’t hit transaction scaling issues due to the structure of the chains. That is what differentiates it and allows the fees to be 0 rather than just “small until the network has more use” as is the case with traditional blockchains.
It’s on binance, kucoin and plenty of shit exchanges. Also Nanex is continually expanding even though they’ve been doing meme coins at first to get attention. Also, it intends to capture market share in areas beyond “buying shit coins.” Look at the solid mobile wallets and the plan for smart cards. I’m not even shilling, I sold all of mine a while back and i’m waiting for alts to really bottom out before I re-enter the market.
At least NANO should replace LTC, right?
Fellow bagholder here, don't bother trying to convince these idiots, they're fact-resistant.
There is nothing Litecoin does better so in a rational market yes. Is the crypto market rational?