i have no stake in the success or failure of jiberal, but
>medium.com
HERE IT IS FAGGOTS
Grayson Cooper
Aaron Howard
>Given these drivers, we expect JNT-backed jBonds to represent 70-75% of total value on the network. With fiat-backed jCash representing the remaining 25–30%.
what do they mean by 'we expect'? it doesn't sound like a definitive phrase to me
Carson Reyes
Nope. It’s garbage. Lmao.
Eli Garcia
Am I seeing this right? For a 10 mil CryDR you need a 6,25 ml buffer (0,50*1,25). That is almost back to the double backed we had before. Not good.
Jacob Anderson
I sold and fudded here after the first Medium article. Brainlets followed my dump to 54k gwei. There was a solid 2 hours of nothing after the first article, then I dumped a huge chunk. Bought it all back at 45k gwei. Tricking Jow Forums plebs is so comfy.
James Collins
Nothing changed really. Still solid, more solid than 99% of projects in Crypto today. Will dump soon because people are A) Idiots B)Idiots
See you EOY, hopefully this goes below ten cents i want to buy a bunch
Jason Sullivan
SEED is going to be tokenizing in that ratio, see below.
This is the old model. They are being transparent. But your fudding is on point, you are picking the stuff that will make brainlets worry. Kudos.
Henry Harris
What's wrong about that?
Mason Cooper
You jnt will be so rich when the first national bank of Ethiopia sign up and dump all $13.567usd they have on the chain
Ryder Martinez
They said $250m would be split into jCash, jBonds and jAssets. The open pilot now only has jCash and jBonds. I don't think we can expect 70% of the 250m to go into jBonds..