Why did they ruin Latin America?

Why did they ruin Latin America?

Attached: 658BD5C5-D414-4D21-B33A-693CC94D1E51.png (2000x2000, 496K)

fear of the commies

Seriously

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 154K)

Seriously the US should accept latin immigrants with open arms for all the bullshit they pulled. All that gun violence and criminality associated with drug traficking is a direct consequence of their war on drugs. Remember kids, just say no.

implying it wasn't one giant shithole way before any American ever set foot there

they wanted to combat communist movements, but funding local governments and lifting them up to show the wonders of capitalism like the Marshal Plan did in Europe or Japan and South Korea was way too expensive, so the cheaper, more ruthless option was chosen

Have a look at former Soviet bloc and tell me it isn't justified

Henry Kissinger was a Jew

Considering the fact that the Czech Republic is leagues ahead in development when compared to somewhere like Brazil or even Argentina, I’d say it wasn’t worth it at all. But knowing that you’re the underaged Czech Jow Forumstard that gets assblasted any time he sees the color red, it doesn’t really matter. You’d be supported the Taliban if you could because they were “anti commie”.

>mutt
>teaching about your own country

Could you all stop replying to bait threads made by this proxy-fag? Thank you very much

>anyone who says anything about Latin America is a proxy
Sure thing, Joao.

Hahahaha, you got me

Because communsim is already gone for about 30 years and Czech republic was more developed than Brazil and Argentina before it. When you look at countries like Romania, Russia, Ukraine and Bulgaria, you can see what it does.

>abloo abloo how can somebody hate muh perfect system

>immediately disproven
>AKSHUALLY COMMUNISM IS INLY REAL WEN IT FAILS
>a bloo bloo bloo
Not an argument. And it seems I’ve hit the nail on the head with my description.

>implying it wasn't one giant shithole way before any American ever set foot there
it wasn't, it really wasn't
argentina was one of the richest countries in the world and Brazil was also very rich

there's a reason a lot of Europeans went there in the 19th century

Even if communism was Heaven on Earth, western first world countries still had a grudge with it, so CIA niggers intervening would have happened anyways

How was he disproven?

Personally I take issue with quite a lot of things USA did when it pulled all stops to fight the "export of revolution" and made a failed attempt to purge anything that even remotely resembled solidarity between peoples.

But you are a delusional idiot if you don't think that soviet activities in trying to subvert and vassalize every state they could get their hands on were a legitimate threat.

Your descending into childish greentexting is not helping your case either.

>Soviet bloc
Launched people in space.

>south american dictatorships
Launched people from helicopters.

Even now, the life expectancy in Cuba is better than in former dictatorships.

>Launched people in space.
a lot of good it did the average Russian worker.

>Even now, the life expectancy in Cuba is better than in former dictatorships
Lower than Chile

>soviet trained revolutionaries in South America
planted bombs in public buildings, often and intentionally killing civilians, spread their propaganda on high schools, teenagers actually getting involved in terrorist attacks, kidnapped rich kids to demand ransom and then killed them had they received the money or not.
Don't pretend life expectancy is the only metric to measure quality of life either. Both yanks and soviets fucked us over like they did with Rhodesia. Global powers fuck off and leave us alone.

Attached: che.jpg (621x220, 48K)