Anglos are even more evil than nazis. Their philosophy is "if law not protecting some humans - we may kill them"...

We must defend our anglo masters

Attached: images (1).jpg (225x225, 10K)

>Orthobox
>christian
Top kek

@87837909
>you aren't real christian
@87837920
>you are more jewish
typical judeo-masonic anglo-saxon tricks

...

>Russia
hononono

>true christians
If you call "True Christians" the swindlers who use religion to profit and manipulate people. However, this is the purpose of any religion.

what's the evilest race and and why is white people?

we are smart and powerful enough to be evil

Attached: download.png (284x177, 4K)

>Cuckholic
>not heretic
pick one

Agreed. Protestant or bust.

>muh double heresy

At least you got the filename right

>pagan in all but name tries to accuse people of heresy

Anglos were also using the "humans and subhumans" rhetorics

>Literal Jewish slave calling others not Christian

Look at what they did to the Irish.

we aren't chinese be evil?
we are smarter than you

Lol, a crypto atheist calling deciding who is orthodox.

Pic is how they and their lackeys behave on anglos crimes

Attached: blog.png (767x568, 570K)

>russians criticising anyone on genocide

Attached: 1417530355547.gif (375x240, 569K)

We actually never commited a single genocide. Only mass replacements. Anglos tho unironically were eliminating whole nations.

can you give me a serious answer on why they are not? dont wanna debate just curious

>we didn't kill everyone , just partial genocide, so we're good
Why are russians so fucked up?

We just were comparing anglos and us. I don't say we did the right thing with circassians for example, I just point out that anglos were much much worse and therefore responding to this australian post Literally anyone can blame anglos in genocide because nobody was as evil as anglo

There are like a billion indians who is going to miss a few?

Most Europeans are more evil than Nazis and Russians aren't exceptions.
>Oh no Hitler fantasized about maybe ethnically replacing us in a book and that's evil Russians have only been doing that to people All over Asia and Europe for centuries

excellent post

>Jallianwala_Bagh_massacre.jpg
Dyer literally did nothing wrong

Attached: 1517740992735.png (1790x1640, 178K)

You ethnically cleansed the Tatars by sending them to inhospitable places so they did not reproduce.

in fact this is your favorite tactic of ethnic cleansing: Take all the good land and deport the population so they die "of natural causes"

The Kazaks were nearly a minority in their own country. Thank god they escaped you.

He didn't just fantasize. Out of 27mln of our casualties in WWII only 11 were combatants, all the others were actually genocided by germans. 16mln, just think about that, 6 jewish gorillions don't look that terrible. And yet again not a single central asian nation was genocided by us.

And not just the tatars of course, they did these kinds of deportations with other peoples, including Romanians.

Dude tatars lived and still live around Volga and actually make up a majority of the republic, what are you talking about? Nobody touched them since Ivan IV when Kazan was sieged.

Attached: 0_8087f_f83cc27b_orig.jpg (1000x667, 595K)

why are russians such massive dindus?
this is why you're a beta loser people

And yet again, replacement is not even remotely as bad as just simple mass killings that anglos performed.

Circassians and Don Cossacks.
Both deserved it though.

Because we didn't destroy a single nation unlike you.

>You ethnically cleansed the Tatars by sending them to inhospitable places so they did not reproduce.
Lowut? I even go to sauna with Tatar friends

Circassians were replaced, not genocided even tho they were pillaging our border regions for centuries just like krimean tatars who even burnt Moscow twice.

>in the anglosphere
>speaks english
>has a fucking brittish flag on his flag
Buh-buh-but, not Anglo cause not white brit from East Anglia whose family line stretchen back there ten generations!

Kys.

Attached: AC875304-3A5A-47A6-BCB1-CE94BE632CB7-1102-00000BF625477A10.png (750x347, 89K)

yeah it's why you're beta losers
did i stutter?

You also killed a lot of people scum, probably more than the Anglos did, despite them ruling over much more people. And unlike them you didn't even leave any positive influence.
What nation did they destroy?

At least we are not evil

whatabout...

The whole islands of natives on the Carribean, hundred million indians in North America (that's alone much much more than everyone killed by a russian) and natives of Australia and India. Literally hundreds of millions of people.
>positive influence
What influence did american indians got? They just were eliminated. Our native folks at least survived with barely any losts.

>The whole islands of natives on the Carribean
Died of disease and intermixed not to mention the populations must have been very small.
>hundred million indians in North America (that's alone much much more than everyone killed by a russian) and natives of Australia and India
Kek, all those still exist, and there's no way there were 100 million indians in north america, that's just retarded.
>What influence did american indians got?
I was thinking more of the influence in India, but even the natives are still alive and probably live better lives than the average Russian.

>100mln is retarded
That's on of the academic estimation, in any of them that will still be millions. Millions back then is like hundreds of millions now.
>influence in India
Not even the worst russian region lives as bad as India so you're just proving my point - in the case anglos didn't manage to destroy the population completely they turned it into complete ultimate shithole.
>all natives in America
You mean remnants of them, most of them were killed

All Russians can do when they are confronted with people from Ex-soviet countries complaining about war crimes and other inhumane treatments they can only point fingers and say:
>BUT WHAT ABOUT THE AMERICANSKI
fuck off

Oh yeah they'll also find some irrelevant and obscure Nazi collaborator (who may or may not have even done anything) and claim that the whole country is an immoral fascist dictatorship.

And therefore "deserved it"

Your country exists and speaks your own language tho was occupied by Russia for many decades. Yeah, that's how nightmarish genocides end up

>That's on of the academic estimation, in any of them that will still be millions
No where close to 100 mil though, considering the population of the US today is around 350 mil. with modern agriculture. Not to mention a lot of those guys died due to diseases, not because they were illed.
>Millions back then is like hundreds of millions now.
So? Thank God they'r not that numerous. Read up on the indians, they were basically roaming bands of serial killers. It's good that they got replaced.
>Not even the worst russian region lives as bad as India so you're just proving my point - in the case anglos didn't manage to destroy the population completely they turned it into complete ultimate shithole.
Implying it was any different before. The brits gave India a common language that could unite it, which is also the lingua franca of today and that helps their economy. And from what I've seen a lot of indians still use British era trains.
>You mean remnants of them, most of them were killed
Source?

And even if I don't convince you that you are worse than the British, doesn't mean Russia wasn't an evil barbarian empire.

What you did to us was still objectively wrong. Sincerely tell me what point was there to murder every major political party member in 1940? What was the point of deporting women and children to unlivable conditions?

Ask mad georgian psycho and latviam marksmen who brought him to power, not russians, we just happened to be the majority on the territory siezed by them

We gave the lingva franca to central Asia too but didn't genocide them in the process and kazakhs or uzbeks live much better than indians
>source
Source on elimination of north american indians?

>those weren't Russian soldiers who enforced those orders guys

>highest living standart in USSR
>occupation

Attached: 550.png (207x243, 6K)

Soldiers (most of them were ukrainians tho) were conscripted, do you know what conscription is? They just followed orders.

>Still barely any food products in store shelves
>Has to buy meat from the provider

>What was the point of deporting women and children to unlivable conditions
we did it for fun and we'll do it again in future
watch out german bootlicker

>we aren't chinese be evil?

Idgaf about Germany.

>At least we are not evil

Attached: slavface.png (700x822, 179K)

youtube.com/watch?v=DAKPgu5yDrM

>We gave the lingva franca to central Asia too
No you didn't. Russian isn't lingua franca english is.
>didn't genocide them in the process and kazakhs or uzbeks live much better than indians
So what you think that if Russia had occupied India they would be better of now? Lol. And the British didn't genocide the Indians either.
>Source on elimination of north american indians?
Yes, source that they were genocided.

How is this and argument?

yeah I know what's in your filthy lithuanian mind: kissing german boots while watching anime and masturbating
don't try to trick me PIDORAS CYKA

>english is
Try to speak english in Tashkent, then try russian, see the difference
>they would better
Yes, they would
>they were genocided
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_of_indigenous_peoples

thats not an answer

Ironic because most of the problems in the modern world can be traced back to Russia and Russian influence, particularly Soviet influence.

You wouldn't give anyone this level of empathy if they weren't Russian, though.

Would it make any difference if I said no? Germans are irrelevant. (I do watch anime though uwu)

You don't think lugging icons around and blessing weapons is pagan as fuck?

How do we stop the Eternal Anglo, lads?

Attached: 1521129752556.png (2618x3453, 3.99M)

>Try to speak english in Tashkent, then try russian, see the difference
What a fucking moron. Yah of course that's true because you ruled over them. But if they spoke english instead of russian, they would be much better off.
>Yes, they would
Kek, you only brought misery to Moldova but you actually believe you could help the Indians, where even an advanced country like the UK couldn't.
>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_of_indigenous_peoples
Still nothing like what you did, and an essential distinction is that unlike russians, americans and anglos don't take pride in this and acknowledge their mistakes. Not to mention Indians were savages and the anger towards them is somewhat justified.

No, it's christian. Why would it be pagan? Did the pagans have icons of Jesus and Mary.

Anglos are the root of all problems in the modern world. Had they let Bonaparte win the world would be a much better place, but they had to bankroll the Coalitions because they hate the French because the French are more human than them. I hate them, I wish Napoleon won and Waterloo, we should have nuked the UK not Japan. I'd kill a brit.

every christian church has its pagan characteristics

also,those priests didnt create orthodoxy.The people that created and compeleted orthodoxy were against paganism.

I find this blessing political oriented...

They had their icons as well

I read what Masaryk wrote about Russian religious officials. Superstitious and corrupt to the bone. I don't think it has changed a lot.

Wrong, Anglos are awesome. And Napoleon was a moron.
>every christian church has its pagan characteristics
No it doesn't. There are certain cultural aspects present sure, but not pagan.

>They had their icons as well
Which weren't christian. And I'm pretty sure they didn't have icons actually, I never heard of this.

Try and stop us.

Attached: 1521475740014.png (1142x1038, 331K)

yes i mean pagan characteristics in a cultural aspect

wh*Te people in general have always been known to be a disease and blight upon this Earth, no need for discussion.

Well that's fucking retarded. Paganism is religious, there's nothing pagan about popular customs.

Hitler killed all those people in Eastern Europe and the Japs killed all those people in China and Stalin help them do it all because of the desperate situation the eternal Anglo put them in. Only after they finally agreed to submit did ending their violent ways make sense

>16 million civilians killed by nazis in just a few years
how can non nazis compete

>Why Russia joined WW1
anglos asked
>Why Germany rebuilt army after WW1
anglos allowed
>Why Hitler didn't removed from start
anglos
>Why Poland lost
anglos betrayal
>Why Molotov-Ribbentrop pact happened
desperade reaction on anglos cunning game
>Why Finland joined Axis
anglos
>Why arabs stood against Israel
anglos

You know about japs?

>anglo-russian wars
>0
slavs are too scared to fight anglos

What are totems, charms, etc.
Yeah, it's not a painting of a saint but the purpose is the same