The first general dedicated to protecting the Free World and the international liberal order.
Invited:
NATO member states
Not invited:
Russians, Chinamen
The first general dedicated to protecting the Free World and the international liberal order.
Invited:
NATO member states
Not invited:
Russians, Chinamen
Other urls found in this thread:
express.co.uk
en.m.wikipedia.org
quora.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
first for russia
What will replace the 5.56?
Braaaaaaaaap
where my NATO niggas @
hah behold
natocucks
Whatever America wants.
Oh god no no y-you w-wouldnt dare.
>not 7.62 real FUCKING nato
nigga pls
Also I think Im not invited, I have more important things inside my country to solve. And Im not north atlantic.
USA how does it feel that your tax dollars are going into my politicians' pockets?
Why are we in NATO again? What does it gain us?
this is why we need NATO
Excellent post.
if you join up you get to meet cute euro boys
God bless NATO
The shield of civilized world against authoritarianism and barbarism
nothing its just an instrument of US imperialism that only cucks love
however you will gain a couple of russian warheads if americans finally manage to provoke a war with them
>p-p-please Finland-san join NATO so we can actually protect the Baltics from Russia
Haha no!
I mean we are their automatic allies regardless. I'm just wondering what either the US or Canada gains in subsidizing europe's defense.
for example we buy our main battle rifles from you
>implying Finland doesn't need NATO
Finland think that they are wise because they don't want to join NATO. The truth is nobody wants this f*cking traitors in any alliance.
Do mods even care about this any more? They don't seem to give a fuck about most meme image dumps these days, even the subway/exodia one takes a while to get noticed.
Christ this site has gotten stale over the years.
they gain power, what else?
also more nations are forced/pressured to buy american equipment
5.45
>Implying that Finland needs NATO
are NATO allies invited?
Do you have some issue with governments freely electing to purchase the highest-quality goods available?
This thread is proof ruskis need to be sterilized.
>NATO thread
>Finn or Swede start attention whoring to let everyone know that they're not a member
every single time
Nobody needs an alliance where Poland is part of desu
Of course. All free peoples who sympathise with the ideals of our alliance are more than welcome, perhaps one day you can formally join with us.
no i dont have an issue with purchasing russian goods, but you faggots obviously do
express.co.uk
The Russiacuck wants Putin's Jew cock in his mouth
Every alliance would like to have Poland, because we are good cannon fodder and of course we are not traitors like you
>daily express
who does not want to
You would be hard pressed to find a country that’s more likely to stick with its allies even in a losing fight desu
Anyone over 5’6”
Can't be traitor when you are not taking sides and handling only own business. BTW how does it feel to be Americas puppet? I hope it is better than getting raped by Soviets lol
nato is pathetic
doubt it'll ever be relevant but do you honestly think you could stand against the russian armed forces?
wonder how that might be given that Russia is toally outmatched by the US alone
>needs an alliance of 28 countries and a budget of a trillion $
>still loses
lmaoooo what a shit organization
no i just want mutts to fuck off back to their own continent and leave europe for good
although i wouldn mind having russians instead of you(literally everyone is better than you, including china), after all they are our fellow slavs and our language, culture and mindset are much more alike than with you disgusting creatures
Pictures from across the Fulda Gap during Operation Able Archer.
we can easily defeat american ground forces tho
shoot down planes and destroy carriers and america is handicapped
Why yes we can and we did. This is not a Denmark who lost Germans in days _D_ _A_ _Y_ _S_. And Germans even lost to Russians TO RUSSIANS LOL
A more recent exercise involving rapid reaction bridge-building over the Vistula, in Poland.
>nato shills WILL deny this
>I hope it is better than getting raped by Soviets lol
I don't know how it is to getting rape by soviets. Ask your countrymen in Viipuri
5.45 soviet and 5.56 nato are the same, it's just a matter of measurement bore (including or excluding rifling)
The flags of freedom standing tall during Operation Iron Sword.
paper tiger
when ever the delusional ruski, the brain invalid finn and the diaspornik with german flag happen to post in the same thread it is always great fun to monitor. keep me amused monkeys :DD
i am sure you have more knowledge than the top defence experte amirite
Hey remember when you used to independent after WWII? Yeah me neither
Please note that Russians are not invited to this thread. This includes diaspora Russians. You may make your own thread for airing out your criticisms of NATO.
How fucking powerful do they think Russia is? :D
>2016
Yeah that's what eFP is for, plus increased defense spending among all member states and the US reopening bases and pre-positioned Army stocks in Europe
You're all shit.
idk
It all comes to strategy
Well he might one of the hundred NATO soldiers which will protect Estonia from Russian army.
Airborne soldiers seen during a joint exercise in Georgia, a possible future member state.
>Please note that Russians are not invited to this thread. This includes diaspora Russians. You may make your own thread for airing out your criticisms of NATO.
Or what? You will start deleting messages and tweets?
At least i wasn't traitor
We bombed Belgrade's hospitals and schools for months because Lewinsky wasn't sucking it right and Russia did fuck all about it. Their victories in Georgia and Ukraine didn't involve NATO.
It comes to equipment, supply lines, production and manpower. Atleast if you disregard nukes.
truth hurts huh
truth is stil truth even if you dislike the ethnicity of the person speaking it out
If allegiance to a superficial code of alliance becomes before national sovereignty i'm afraid but i'll have to say you don't really deserve to be independent
yeah no shit because fucking yeltsin was in power
>these butthurt Finns
We all know Finland is a de facto NATO member state, and even Finnish politicians have said Finland would need NATO help in case of an armed conflict with Russia.
>inb4 someone brings up WW2, as if that is a proper benchmark for modern warfare
>Implyin allegiance to your country isn't basically the same thing
>inb4 someone brings up WW2, as if that is a proper benchmark for modern warfare
see for their opinion about that
>nothing its just an instrument of US imperialism that only cucks love
>however you will gain a couple of russian warheads if americans finally manage to provoke a war with them
They'd get them no matter what.
The thing is the populace has a differing opinion on Nato as the sitting government. We'll have to see how opposition handles itself in the next election. The NATO vote has always being a close one being usually about 50/60 against.
While I agree the Russian forces are in a particular bad shape specially if you compare the us navy to the Russian one I don’t see the euros alone beating it, just stopping it maybe, somewhere in Poland or Germany. Russians always seem to have little regard for the lives of their soldiers and the US will have to move properly before they can beat Russia back into Russia, and then a stagnation
And tho Russia has literally infinite resources I don’t think they can afford a war and the US relies on Europe needing money for rebuilding after major wars so the US can afford that attrition war
>p-p-please Finland-san join NATO so we can actually protect the Baltics from Russia
>Haha no!
That's not why your not in NATO Pekka....
You act like little girls who do not let the boys play with them
>Implying that NATO can protect baltics without Finland
You got backwards. And no we are not "de facto NATO member" but I get it you really really really wish we would be but we aren't.
Sovereignty of the governmental body where i grew up and where my parents grew up etc, i'd say that's a pretty good ideal to protect especially if that governmental body has been able to produce a successful society.
Finlandiazation ended right after USSR fell. Moot point.
>also more nations are forced/pressured to buy american equipment
Go back to Serbia you ignorant twat. We use a lot of their equipment.
Why do Americans hate Finns so much?
An SM-2 launch during Operation Formidable Shield.
Wow, i hate early 20th century america now.
An F-22 stationed in the Baltics.
Hello, does Britain have any more falseflag operations coming up in the near future?
Let me join.
But Japan-san you are not in the North Atlantic.
Well that's fair, but being against a powerful NATO (whether Finland is a member or not) is detrimental to Finland's own security.
>>Implying that NATO can protect baltics without Finland
Does Finland have troops in the Baltics? Or ever offered it? Would Finland protect its airspace? Blockade the Gulf of Finland?
>you really really really wish we would be but we aren't
It wouldn't do much for the overall strength of NATO, since that's still 90% based on America's huge armed forces.
I say Finland is a de facto member because Finland regularly trains with NATO troops, has equipment that's largely NATO-compliant and buys most of its weapon systems from NATO members. The only thing that's missing is Finland being able to invoke Article V.
Winter forces on exercise in Norway during Operation Cold Response.
It helps keep any fight in Europe stay in Europe.