>British """police""""
British """police""""
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
policeone.com
youtube.com
scpr.org
staradvertiser.com
nbcnews.com
twitter.com
They're all PCSO's except for the one in the hi-vis, not really police
i'm joining the military police soon to kill nigs like that and show first world fags how you do it
Thread theme
youtube.com
If that was murica he would have been killed in 0:04
In America, he's be dead. Same here in Canada frequently and often.
Personally, congrats to British police for finding a non-lethal alternative. That takes real balls.
0:29 lmao
just shoot him already!
>American police: *guns down 3 innocent bystanders*
>jus shooo em
meanwhile in America
youtube.com
Try negative 0:45 (before the video starts) when the first two officers get out of their cruiser and just. fucking. waste. him
>and that's a BAD thing, because life and death even of criminal scum should be used much, much judiciously than it is now
I'm a leftarded lib but I love the shit out of this video
did they taze his eye?
argentine police.
Yo.
AJJAJAJAJA
Much better to not kill someone and keep them alive so their family doesn't recent the police. Retaliation in gang violence and attacks on police just create a circle of death
lol you can't kill police in a country where knives are banned
So wait, they prevented anyone from getting hurt and then took down the knife wielding suspect with a taser before arresting him? What's the problem?
Fuck criminals. If depended on me the range of punishment would be chopping hands for burglary to hanging for murder.
>b-b-but muh deescalation
>b-b-but nobody was killed
not tacticool
Everyone found one ages ago, Tasers. Why those cops can't carry them I have no fucking idea, and I have no fucking idea why anyone would be against their use.
>b-b-but there's the slightest possibility if you shoot an 80 year old with a heart condition and high on coke he could have a stroke b-b-b-b-b-b
It's garbage. I agree with the americans for the fact that the cops should be rendering criminals incapacitated as soon as possible so that they can't threaten anyone, I don't agree with killing anyone with anything in their hands like animals though, luckily this middle ground already exists.
>prevented
what the fuck did those scared faggots could possible prevent running around like literal fucking sheep? he could have stabbed anyone he wanted. embarrassing. just one good shot and end of story.
i don't see a reason why he should be dead
he will eventually kill someone after serving a few weeks and getting released on probation. that yuro faggotry is pathetic.
why do yanks always want their cops to be these badass OTT judge dredd zero tolerance types who shoot first and ask later? it's really weird and out of character for people who see themselves as anti authoritarians
Based brazil. 1st world tier
we have black people here that don't give a fuck and have to be dealt with harshly
*should NOT be dead
>be american
>police shoot you
>be british
>police cannot protect you
>be canadian
>police do their fucking job
is that knife wielding white nigger any different?
your cops shoot criminals all the time.
No need for sarcasm.
Our cops seem to shoot people. Based Finland at least shoots to wound.
not a sarcasm. i really think that's the way to deal with crime.
>shoots to wound
that sounds so fucking retarded it is even funny. how about shoot to miss. or shoot to make noise
>how about shoot to miss. or shoot to make noise
aren't those warning shots
Why not shoot the perp in the leg?
What's your problem, OP? A violent situation has been properly de-escalated with zero injuries for everyone involved. The reason why you need three to four people to take out a single person because you have to do it with minimum injury for all parties involved.
>fire a warning shot
>criminals shoots back and kills him
>in the leg?
policeone.com
Why do you need to worry about only causing a minimum injury to a dangerous criminal who possesses a deadly weapon with an intention to kill?
There are very few cases of RCMP shooting without good reason, or shooting when it's unnecessary. Usually when they kill someone with a gun it was the right choice to make.
Tell me first why brit cops are such subhuman cucks
Damn, pakis and nigers have no respect for your policewomen lul
tasers are very ineffective
youtube.com
go to about 50 seconds
in an actual life/death situation, you're gonna want something more reliable than a taser
Because punitive violence creates the sort violent death spirals and blood feuds which we moved already past since the bronze age. It's like you are totally ignorant of the innovation that has been taken place in modern justice systems. You are the equivalent of someone asking why we don't move back to using clay tablets.
>only shooting when necessary
Oh reeery
Like that's any different anywhere else.
this, except unironicaly
OHNONONONONONONONONONO
>very ineffective
>"this single clip vs thousands of cases of them being extremely effective proves my point"
>even in the clip he's stunned enough to not have much resistance
>de-escalation
Quite tolerant and in the end no one dies. But what is that white gun thing in the end? Tasers?
The criminal in OPs case had a knife.
>neutralizing an armed criminal by shooting at his center of mass creates a bronze age death spiral
>let's just run away from him
>or let's just shoot at his left leg
don't even try to reason with yanks. they've been programmed since birth to worship police.
I just posted 3 articles proving him wrong
It does. Your primitive notions on law enforcement and judicature are on par with that of a child. Rehabilitative justice works and it's the reason why crime and violent deaths have been dropping for centuries.
respond to my articles, cucks
>what the fuck did those scared faggots could possible prevent running around like literal fucking sheep
Not getting close to the knife-wielding man without a weapon.
>be chinese
>make a communist joke
>go to jail