>kill children with normal bombs
>no one cares
>kill children with chemical weapons
>everyone freaks out
WTF?
Kill children with normal bombs
David Reed
Other urls found in this thread:
Ethan Miller
The chemical weapons weren't supplied by israel
Charles Brooks
chemical weapons are banned, bombs are not
Chase Thomas
Mason Thomas
chemical and biological weapons are banned because too OP
in the middle ages pope banned using crossbows, because every brainlet peasant could kill a noble knight in plate armor
Lucas Foster
If your forefathers in the fronts of world war 1 werent complete mongoloids spraying phosgene and chlorine gas everywhere maybe chemical weapons would still be allowed today.
Good job Jean Pierre
Alexander Baker
>Syria
>secular democracy
>Saudi Arabia
>holy monarchy
Guess which one is rich and doesn't get bombed?
Jordan Cook
Children are collateral damage in war. Like it or not, there is not a single war, nor a single country, that has not killed children.
But the geneva convention is strict on weapons that can be used in war. And one of the prime aspects of that is that you can not use a weapon that is meant to inflict pain, not death, upon the enemy. Or a weapon that is supposed to kill in a painful manner (which chemicals do).
Bombs on the other hand, in 80% of cases, kill instantly, or nearly instantly. And are specifically designed to kill, not mame.
Carter Reed
Chemical weapons are just a pretext to rile up the nornies, the obvious truth is that the wargods are hungry and in the mood for syrian cuisine.
Elijah Davis
>nor a single country, that has not killed children
ayo hol up