>falling for the leafbait
My ancestor :)
Zachary Torres
Ethan Sanchez
and yes the evidence for whales as a mammal, specifically which mammal is only a small bone located in the ear but this is how evolutionary science is, to take small pieces of commonality and find common others
this should give you the idea that no religious or other worldly view was ready for the discovery of fossils to fit into their nice world-story and it was only through relentless aggressive questions that you can imply even more missing genomes in the biology of life
one of the most challenging ideas for people in the old ways was the age of earth, even prominent scientists of the last century could not fathom that earth was more than a few million years old become anything else is not only heretical it made no sense in their mechanistic view of the world, just decades prior to the papers by plank and einstein scientists though the age of discovery was over and that they have discovered most of important forces in the world
no wonder why the youth still romanticize the turn of the last century
Chase Bell
>though
thought*
Isaac Morgan
>fossils
you think fossil evidence is on the evolution theory's side. go look up the discovery of soft tissue formation found in a dinosaur bone. that alone btfo's the 'dinosaurs lived millions of years ago' narrative. and it should make you question the rest of whatever the pop-sci factory pushes into the mainstream like the entirety of evolution theory
Evan Perry
Hunter Wood
i haven't discussed the fact that dinosaurs are millions of years old, yet
you seem to have something you wanted to say beforehand
in any case if it passes peer review than it can change, the theory at least, which is to prove a statement of how old the fossils are not just oh "evolution is wrong", which isn't a theory by itself
Jack Mitchell
el niño rata
William Roberts
there is no scientific evidence for evolution theory, as a whole. when you're defending evolution, you're defending its premise that every organism has a single common ancestor and there's 0 scientific proof or hint for it
Nathan Cruz
no, evolution comes in many parts with many different theories
the original one by darwin had no such premise, only that species evolve according to various factors
William Taylor
what the fuck do you even think evolution is then