Your country

>your country
>did your ancestors rob future generations of your country's nature by destroying everything

denmark
yes

Attached: 1522579933319.png (818x918, 248K)

russia
actually yes (not counting siberia and ural and n*rth and far e*st)

france
yes

Most likely, at least in the Valle Padana. Yet, i'm pretty sure forests are slowly increasing and wildlife is being reintroduced pretty much everywhere in Europe.

Boomers were a plague everywhere I see

denmark is one of the few places in europe where forest loss is higher than growth.
we literally have less protected areas than the netherlands lmao fuck this shithole.

Sweden
No, we always planted two new trees for each one cut down. And now we have a housing crisis.

Attached: 1415453136876.jpg (545x380, 51K)

Actually, we just created some new land called Flevoland.

And the area between Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht is kept empty. It's called The Green Heart.

Strange, i'd have guessed Denmark had a strong green component in its politics.

The future of Denmark - one big pig farm. Is there just not the desire in your country to have nature?

No we have extremely well preserved nature. Instead the boomer generation and the one before ruined our country through other means

Yes, but mostly because we still have shitloads of nature after that

What would a filthy brit know about nature?

not really, the government doesn't give a shit about nature, only profit. same with the average dane, they are so afraid of nature that they would rather see it destroyed.

here's a fine example of this mentality: a few years ago wolves migrated back here and now a bunch of people have started an organization that aims to eradicate it AGAIN because they are afraid of it. I hate living in this country populated by urbanite subhumans.

We don't have natural nature though. Our entire country is designed.

Epic ftw, we have pretty big national parks you know, have a look on Google maps. We're also 'rewilding' by planting more woodland and reintroducing animals that were wiped out hundreds of years ago, like lynx and beavers

Unironically move to the New World.
Canada and the USA, we care about the wildlife.
Europe is an oddity, honestly.

This is correct.

australia
technically no because this country already has a habit of destroying itself

Okay you have gained my trust and friendship

this, the bushfires take care of everything

Those people are everywhere. We have no large predators which is a problem in Scotland because the deer reproduce or of control and stop trees growing. There are plans to reintroduce lynx and wolves but of course farmers are worried they'll eat their sheep

The boomers grew fat on the decades following WWII, got ez jobs, housing, and then worked to deny the following generations their share of the pie. Now the old fuckers are all about to retire and expect us to pay for it.

1. Flag
2. I don't think so but I'm pretty sure we're ruining everything for our descendants right now

Yes, faggot retard boomers build mines up near reefs and do fuckall to stop the destruction of the Great Barrier Reef. Fuck Boomers.

>denmark is one of the few places in europe where forest loss is higher than growth.
That's just straight up false. Forests have been growing for like 120 years now. And are still growing every year.

>
>a few years ago wolves migrated back here
They were released artificially. And given how little space they have here it can't be avoided that they kill pets and farm animals. Which is obviosly not something everybody appreciates.

You can always help your ancestors by planting new trees and promoting the environment
Isn't the entire peninsula of Denmark attached to remnant basically empty anyway?

us
probably

Nah, forest area is above 50% and actually increasing every year.

Also my country is 2/3 uninhabitable mountains so going there and destroying nature would be costly and a lot of effort. This is why it has never been done.

Usually wolves only attack sheep herds if they don't have enough prey in the wild. If you really have that many deer things should be fine.

>they are afraid of it

farmers I assume