1. your cunt 2. is smoking a problem in your cunt? 3. should your cunt ban smoking? 4. do politicians want to ban smoking but can't because democracy is a popularity contest and if they ban smoking the filthy smokers won't vote for them again?
Why would you want to ban smoking? Let people kill themselves, it's their choice.
Noah Peterson
Also any taxpayer-funded healthcare should not cover anything directly related to smoking. It's not even like other drugs where you actually get anything out of it beyond sating an addiction, and ends up being far more harmful than moderate alcohol/weed/whatever use in the long run
Smokers are also pissy little shits with persecution complexes on par with SJWs and Jow Forums
Kayden Hughes
1 flag 2 used to be 3 no 4 no, state governments rely on the revenue too much
Ryan Foster
>2018 >Doesn´t smoke cigarettes Were you bullied in school, mentally retarded or perhaps both?
>I-It kills you! Yes, and? Was life a competition about who lives the longest?
>Y-You get addicted on them! No you don't, expect if you are underage and incapable of smoking in moderation.
>I-Its expensive!!! Who forced you to buy a pack a day, you fucking peat-gavel?
1. Flag 2. Not really thanks to snus 3. No but they should tax the fuck out of it so it's only viable to have a pack when you're out drinking 4. Not really, they want more restrictions however
Xavier Clark
See If not banning smoking I would at least ban any form of doing it publicly. For some reason this is okay but I can't drink a beer in public
Adrian Brown
because our healthcare system is based on tax money, which means i have to pay for health issues that could easily been avoided.
Luis Brown
Only subhumans smoke
Carter Smith
It saves money though. They get cancer or have heart attacks and die young before turning old and consuming lots of healthcare
Anthony Butler
based
Chase Sanders
How is Italy not on this list? 1. Italy 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. No
Lincoln Cook
1.fag 2.no 3.yes 4.no i am very surprised austria is that high
Kayden Anderson
1. Flag. 2. Yes. 3. No, people should be free to do so as long as they don't bother others with it in my opinion. 4. Yes. They are actively trying to stop smoking by banning it completely in restaurants and cafe's. Today the first smoking free street of the country was on the news. It only is a matter of time before it gets banned completely, especially with all the anti-smoking propaganda on TV.
Aiden Cruz
>smoking in public >not bothering others
Jack Perry
flag idk nah nah
Ryder Thompson
how the fuck are france and belgium not on that list
Jaxson Gonzalez
People should be free to smoke on their own property or in places where there are no people to annoy with it.
Thomas Powell
It's been banned in all closed public spaces and eating establishments which I think is as much as you can ask for. Would be nice if people paid more mind to you when they smoke nearby on the streets, but it's not worth getting into an anger mindset over.
John Howard
>People should be free to smoke on their own property. As long as the smoke doesn't violate the NAP and enters others property without permission of course.
Hudson Parker
Canada Depends on the area Public smoking in dense areas should be banned Yes
Also fuck people who smoke weed in densely populated public areas.
Gavin Sanchez
1. austria 2. yes 3. yes 4. the right wing is way too fucking populist and does whatever the fuck they want.
Austin Allen
1. Bulgaria 2. Can't say so 3. Don't think so 4. Smoking hasn't been discussed in years
When I graduated school I was the only one from my class of 29 that did not smoke.