Why are European genes so weak?
Why are European genes so weak?
Other urls found in this thread:
quora.com
twitter.com
honestly, it's in white western countries that we see the black in anything mixed, because that is the "exception" in our society.
take pic related, a mulatto girl, and drop her into central Africa and they might very well consider her white.
So we can spot the mixed nigga to preserve rurope
No they wouldn't, they aren't blind
yes they would you retard
They literally don't, they would call her mixed.
A mixed black
A white black.
so why is she just "black" in western countries?
why not a mixed white?
Because they see themselves as the standard you fucking brainlet.
no. two of these are considered black in western world, in africa two of these would be considered white
the standard what? and can you verify this? Haitians went after the mulattos for being too white in their revolution.
In Brazil all three are white.
well that would seem to settle it, like my first post suggested, societies see what makes them separate, not similar.
meaning that to proper Africans, racemixing is making them less black, not a stab against whites.
she looks british to me
are amerimutts really that obsessed about their heritage or is it a meme
That advert was fucking awful.
Why aren't afros popular among darker-skinned women anymore? I always thought they were cute.
because ironically, even after all the Black Empowerment they still seek to be white
Beyonce is championed as the peak of black beauty and being praised for what amounts to white features.
Am I the only one who finds it ridiculous that whites talk about features like it's something they own?
You mean like the color of your skin?
A black, for example, happens to have a thinner nose and you talk that it's a "white feature" instead of a shared feature that both happens to have.
People like OP are so utterly retarded brainlets that they don't realize that 99% of the "black" people they see are actually mixed. Look at this woman. She's a nigra. Now look at her daughter. Yes, the daughter is an ugly monkey creature, but it definitely looks 50% human, 50% nigra. You just associate any
You're currently being extremely fucking stupid, which is a retard feature.
honestly mixed bag. from what i can tell, it depends on location.
the three major american cultures are the Southern culture, the Middle American culture, and the New England one.
Middle America got hit hardest with the "America has no real culture, we're a melting pot/salad" that says that it's all individual histories with no real ethos.
the South on the other hand is either African-American or American by self-identification.
I grew up in the Upland South with vague understandings of German and Scotch-Irish ancestry, but it is so distant now and the American culture is so strong i just see myself as American in identity.
I have never been to New England and won't speak for them
Throw a diamond into a pile of shit and itll come out looking like shit
I think he's talking about traditionally "non-white" people that straighten their hair and lighten their skin with makeup. I mean, at the end of the day people can do whatever they want with their bodies, I just prefer afros/curlier hair.
are you saying that different populations don't tend to have different features?
I'm saying that you don't have a monopoly on them.
When you're at the top of the genetic pool, the only way you can go by mixing is down
Because such researches are complete shit?
There is not such thing as "genes from ivory coast".
There's nothing inherently "white" about "white features". Prove me wrong
protip: you can't
Saying "they're not all like that!" is the ultimate brainlet argument
It's like, NO fucking shit 100% of X isn't like X, if you aren't dumb or desperate to come up with some kind of argument, you wouldn't have to use this argument
>having reddish blonde hair, blue eyes, white skin, freckles, all at the same time isn't necessarily "white"
Why is straight hair "white" if asians and ameridians also have them for example
Why is white skin "white (as in race)" if inuits, japanese and IIRC neanderthals also have them?
Where did they make that claim? I've never even heard someone say that before irl
because they are within the context of white societies.
the dynamic might be different with different countries, and that's what this whole thread is about.
but black people in white countries lightening their skin, straightening their hair, and the like?
context, nigger
people decide based in the differences
between the British and the Japanese, the distinctions are made along things such as the epicantic fold and height, not on skin, much like between Dravidian Indians and Bantu Africans where as the girl in quora.com
guess what is the most striking differences between whites and blacks?