Stinkies

Only fools believe that
The devs will syphon Req from that wallet and market sell it for ever
At your expense fool
Anyway, Req $30 eoy fool

ok calm down geez
nice anyways, RLC is another criminally undervalued coin

thats...not how burn contracts work at all. the smart contract code is public on etherscan.

this
github.com/RequestNetwork/requestNetwork/blob/master/packages/requestNetworkSmartContracts/contracts/core/Burner.sol

REQ and LINK holder here. Stop being retarded. Req's price isn't going up "simply by the fact that tokens are disappearing". The market still sets the price, retard. Sometimes I wonder if I've made misjudgements in some of my investments when I see some of the mongs post about them.

>Open source code that anyone can inspect
>Developer will secretly siphon coins

Pick 1. I wish Jow Forums had mandatory IQ tests so only people with an IQ above 100 could post.

quality larp, really sound like you're straight from Reddit

Your portfolios will now never recover, praise kek

No one on biz has an IQ above 100

REQ is worthless without Chainlink.

They rely on Chainlink to work before Request can roll out their main product.

There is literally no reason to invest in REQ right now as the price will stay the same or dip until Chainlink mainnet gets released, which means LINK will be around $100-$1000

Not true anymore now that REQ can exchange gold with DGD. No need for LINK anymore. As they will use similar options for fiat.

Where do you think the burned tokens come from? They have to be bought to be used.

Look all these debates are pointless, REQs total value will be proportional the net fees, the fees will always be a percentage fraction of the money being moved across the network. Therefore simple maths tells us REQs value will be correlated to the net amount of money sent along the network. You can add variables like bull/bear market multiplier (say 5x in a bull market and 0.66 in a bear one) etc but ultimately adoption will drive price.

>Shitting on LINK while promoting REQ, when REQ depends on LINK to succeed
>Talks about LINK "still going down" after it had decent bear-market pump yesterday and is still up

I don't know if there is a "brainlet" meme small enough to represent you.

low tier fud, REQ absolutely does not need LINK and has several potential solutions for the same problem, as well as there being more than one alternative to decentralized oracles. I also am invested in LINK, but let's cut the shit.

Already missing one REQ, its okay right now but im gunna be pissed when these are $1000 each like wtf

999,999,999 TOKENS OF REQ ON THE WALL
999,999,999 TOKENS OF REQ
TAKE ONE DOWN
BURN IT TO THE GROUND
999,999,998 TOKENS OF REQ ON THE WALL

Attached: 1515716894409.jpg (225x224, 6K)

Token burn will slow down though witg rising value

user, who are reqs competition? Why are they better than their competitors?

but REQ tokens get burned at random from people's wallets

Yawn

Zero competition currently. They're a platform for building financial applications on the blockchain. Users would be the next Paypals, Zohos, Stripes, Squares, etc. of the world (or if those companies want to get on the block they would be users).

There’s no competition but brainlets will say OMG, PayPal, Venmo, etc etc. when in fact REQ isn’t just about payments but it’s also about accounting, audits, taxes, fiat pairings, and many other features—hence PwC partnership. Go DYOR. Faggot.

Download the latest firmware today!

Secure your REQ, friends.

Attached: E65FDE85-9E37-419D-89F5-9D864355A7D4.jpg (768x336, 20K)

Okay then how about TRX is much better that REQ, has better partnerships, already widespread adoption, and Chinese backers.

I know how to lock my coins value on the Trezor. How does this work on the ledger? Can i use my Trezor?

Please don't turn this into a TRX LARP thread, there are enough of those. We want to talk about a real token with an actual future in here, and that token is REQ.

at 17 req burned per day, it would take 81699 years to get to a total supply of 500 mil tokens.

the thing is currently almost nobody is using REQ, wait till it gets realworld usage before assuming that it'll take 81000 years to burn 500million tokens.

They don't have the shoppify and woocommerce plugin ready yet. Once that's finished website owners can add a "pay with REQ" button with a couple of simple clicks.

They also don't have ERC20 support and Fiat support yet. Wait until all of those features are implemented and we're going to see at least a 10,000 per day burn in 2-3 months or so.

I know. I can't do any other projections though since there's not enough data on how the rate at which tokens are being burnt is increasing.

Yawn intensifies

Checked

This gonna take many many years, request price will remain low for years to come. And sure as fuck no 100 dollar end of year which is simply impossible when all the big players like pwc get their REQ at a discount. You really believe big banks are gonna buy your overpriced bags?
damn

I laughed

Nice pasta

How low can the token supply go? could the circulating supply ever drop down to say 10 million?

yeah but it'd take a long time

MY REQQIE STAYS SUPER SKETCHY 99$ EOY

As usual, REQ gets all the digits. I've never believed in this sillyness but it's ridic how many digits REQ constantly gets.

S
T
I
N
K
Y