B-but Chinese are soulless insectoids, they can only copy...

>B-but Chinese are soulless insectoids, they can only copy, they will never be able to compete intellectually with the West
>>Since 2015, Tsinghua has been ranked as the best engineering and computer science school in the world, based in part on its total research output and performances, topping both Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and National University of Singapore (NUS).[16][17][18][19][20]
>>Internationally, it [Nanjing University] was ranked among the top 100 universities in the world for academic reputation in 2017 by Times Higher Education [11]. Its faculty includes more than 20 Nobel Laureates [12]
AMERIKEKS BTFO
B A S E D XI
A
S
E
D

Attached: 1505336588867.jpg (814x1223, 92K)

>university makes you smart

Attached: brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 41K)

>20 Nobel Laureates [12]
Wow incredible
University of Chicago has 89...

It means 20 nobel laureates as faculty, not alumni.

That's even less impressive

It just means the school is attractive or wealthy enough to get them as faculty. And secondly having them as faculty is pretty prestigious because these people can literally teach anywhere in the world and if they choose your university it’s a ego boast.

Dunno really know how many nobel laureates are in the faculty of the other top universities so can’t really compare.

A lot, also don't forget china doesn't have nearly the same number of equally endowed unis as America. A nobel laureate looking to go to China to work isn't faced with as many options like Princeton, Yale, Chicago, Caltech etc...
The Chinese educational system doesn't have the same strength as America's for top students. That being said, I concede that we are hurt by a certain arrogance in how we think of China in anything considered "modern"

You live in a backwards, third world, shothole country that should have been absorbed into Brazil a long time ago. Every post every made on Jow Forums by an argentinean as been completely and utterly garbage, irrelevant, and pointless

>> a lot

Is not really a good source. A nobel laureate is the top of their field. They could probably teach anywhere if the price is right. But that comes down to the individuals circumstances where they want to go in the end. But wherever they end up, it’s prestigious to that university.

But not that it matters. Those schools are typically for the elites either a lot of money or incredibly smart. Not for us mortals.

>stupid gook computers are good at talking with their brothers

And? China was literally an agrarian country with a GDP per capita of $900 18 years ago. Now it's at $10000.
People thought they would never go up from producing plastic crap. People thought they would would never have an internal market and just fall into irrelevancy once their labor dried up.

Yet look at it now. China is developing smartphones, semiconductors, even large passenger jets (there is a reason why there are pretty much only Airbus and Boeing competing) they are breaking into extremely competitive, high-tech industries and they will only keep growing.

Thanks communism

>swedecuck prices

>But not that it matters. Those schools are typically for the elites either a lot of money or incredibly smart. Not for us mortals.
As a apparently a more than mortal, these schools are not as unobtainable as people think. This isn't Jow Forums bullshit, but I know an insane amount of absolute retards with no discernable skills at every school ranging from Johns Hopkins (a "bad" school of this tier) to my own of Uchicago (third best according to USNews iirc) and above. Some got in from connections, but if you're a hispanic or black applicant, it's laughably easy. I know kids with 28 ACTs (horrible) who are at top unis thanks to their skin, and kids with insane resumes and perfect stats rejected. There is a lot of old/new money here as well, almost entirely private schools. However, as a white middle class applicant I can say it's obtainable to those who work for it, just at a much less obtainable rate than those who are rich, black, or hispanic, (or women for anything remotely STEM).
As far nobel laureates, I believe chicago has 9, Yale is 4(?), Princeton 9, just for examples. Most don't have their nobel laureate staff published and just list affiliated which depending on your considerations for what affiliation means can range from 20 to 200 for some schools. Other medals include Fields (math), and John Bates Clark (econ)

BASED

SEETHING

Attached: 1511184396568.jpg (726x459, 101K)

What is the percentage (gross estimative; qualitative) you would say of people who are there undeservedly?

Triggered

It's actually around ~$8,800, which until last year was less than Mexico.
Nothing about China is remotely impressive.

Comparing per capita when talking about countries as a whole is not a good idea. On a per capita basis, the axis powers won ww2, but that doesn't mean shit does it.

ITT: Huang dons an Argentina proxy and spams Jow Forums for 100 yuan per post

Why are you all so angry/bitter?
Just chill down lmao you fucking dorks

Smartphones, semiconductors, passenger jets, are the plastic shit of this century. It's already been done and the largest companies in the world have made their money. The Chinese will constantly suffer the same fate as usual.

>even large passenger jets
Dude...their aircraft are shitty clones of Soviet planes from the 70s.

Our Aircraft are shitty clones of our planes from the 70s.

We don't want Argent*Na.

hey!!!
I'll have to ask you to please be nice

Big daddy Xi gonna knock Trump the FUCK out

Attached: da6geqpu0wp01.gif (352x240, 458K)

>Comparing GDP per capita doesn't look good when it reveals the majority of the population lives in absolute squander . I want China to finally look like an acceptable cunt...

Do any of you faggots spend time in China. It's absolutely unlivable, I've never met a race of people who were so unsatisfied and willing to die