How many babies die a year because they did not get BCASH shipments?
I think his argument was that lack of economic freedom caused babies to die, which is true.
All of them user...
All of them.
Bcash kills babies too. knew it was bad crypto but not this bad
>people shitting on bcash = depriving people of economic freedom
You're a retard.
Your the one who cant acknowledge a valid point because you hate the person who said it.
I don't think you watched the debate. If you did, your ADHD or dyslexia is preventing you from understanding his argument. Get help.
That point would be retarded even if it was made by anyone other than Roger Ver.
In fact the only reason people are defending him is because he's Roger Ver.
That was literally his point.
Opponents were making use of their economic freedom to shit on Bcash, and according to him that meant people were deprived of economic freedom (and children of life).
Stop being retarded.
>In fact the only reason people are defending him is because he's Roger Ver.
I'm not defending him, I'm just trying to be fair. He didn't say that Bcash could save children, his point was about economic freedom and child mortality.
Watch the debate before commenting
>Opponents were making use of their economic freedom to shit on Bcash, and according to him that meant people were deprived of economic freedom (and children of life).
Kek you really didn't understand his argument, holy shit! Hilarious! Get help, man. You may have ADHD.
>How many humans die a year because they did not get BCASH shipments?
retards don't count
This should be the Bcash logo
His point was that Bcore should stop sabotaging him.
That them doing so was causing people to die.
I did watch it.
Nice argum...
oh
>his point was about economic freedom and child mortality
And how does this relate to Bcash?
No his point was they deliberately slowed down and actually regressed btcs adoption and scaling. Resulting in the creation of bch and setting everything back years. Which if you saw his other presentation he had a clear argument for less economic freedom over time resulting in higher infant mortality. 1+1=2 if you actually watched the debate you wouldn't need me to explain this to you.
You absolutely distorted his argument.
His argument is very simple:
Countries that have less economic freedom have higher child mortality rates. In other words, there's a negative correlation between levels of economic freedom and child mortality.
That's it. Then he said that because Bcash's fees are lower than Bitcoin's, it's more likely to be adopted in poor countries with less economic freedom. It's not so hard to understand, I'm sure you'll get the idea at some point.
See
Pic related.
Oh shut the fuck up. We all know he has a larger stake in bcash ponzi then the bitcoin ponzi and just started spewing retardation to make more money if he dumped.
>No his point was they deliberately slowed down and actually regressed btcs adoption and scaling.
How?
By stopping Ver from working on his project?
You have to be psychotic to claim children are dying because your shitcoin is getting resistance.
Stop talking and do more research. It's very clearly lined out for you.
>i can't argue with his logic so he must be dishonest
ok
2nd meant for frog faggot
Roger's shitcoin is getting resistance, so he resorts to the most extreme form of guilt trip he could think of: "children are dying because you don't like my shit".
Fucking lmao.
>We all know he has a larger stake in bcash ponzi then the bitcoin ponzi
Yes, definitely, he also still has a huge Bitcoin stake, and there's no question that he's pumping his own investments. Still, to be fair with the guy, he is right in saying that lack of economic freedom is correlated with child mortality.
Also, people make $4 a day on average simply can't afford Bitcoin's transfer fees. He's right on that point as well. High fees inhibit adoption. That's all I have to say.
>i have no idea how crypto even works yet i'm still talking pretending like I have the slightest clue
It's logical for you to defend the undefendable when your money is on the line.
But just know you're not fooling anyone. Roger is a petulant child with extreme narcissism.
Borderline psychopathic.
>children are dying because you don't like my shit
lmao
>he is right in saying that lack of economic freedom is correlated with child mortality.
To think he holds the key to economic freedom is megalomaniac.
>To think he holds the key to economic freedom
He never said that. His point was that you need to design cryptocurrencies with low fees, otherwise they won't be useful as an instrument for increasing economic freedom.
>He never said that
Then why is he saying children are dying due to the resistance to his project?
Undefendable? His logic and reasoning is sound. You can't attack that obviously and you didn't even understand what his argument actually was until it was laid out for you. It seems like you still somehow don't get it based off and are resorting to the typical ad hominem. Even if you don't like the means if the end goal is worldwide adoption and economic freedom across the world, wouldn't that give it much better speculative value?
He didn't say that. He said children are dying because of lack of economic freedom.
Get tested for ADHD asap.
why would anyone even want to use bitcoin to send money all over the world when fees are over 50 dollars and confirmation times take hours. That is why core trolls are so deluded.
>His logic and reasoning is sound.
Stop.
He's a psychopathic manchild.
Nobody is dying because Bcash gets shit on. Not until he goes on a murderous rampage because his ego got hurt.
>He said children are dying because of lack of economic freedom.
He does not hold the definitive key to economic freedom. He has no place saying this shit.
IT'S NOT BCASH
>ad hom
>ad hom
How do you still not get the fucking argument? Waste of my time.
His argument:
>people die more without economic freedom
>only I can provide economic freedom
>therefore: people die more without my solution
psychopathic
>He does not hold the definitive key to economic freedom
If he never said that, then why did he say children were dying in a Bcore vs Bcash debate?
holy shit i didnt think us real bitcoiners would trigger you faggots so hard. this is too good
its the argument that stagnation prevents technology development which translates to more death relatively
it's loose with bch
>His argument:
>>people die more without economic freedom
This is true. See >>only I can provide economic freedom
False. He never said that. He says cryptocurrencies can INCREASE economic freedom, as long as they have low fees and thus are affordable.
>>therefore: people die more without my solution
He never said that.
>psychopathic
Ad hominem argument.
Another day, another corekek fud thread, another 0 threads on BTC developments. Their desperation is getting laughable.
In January I predicted that BCH and ETH will flip segwit core EOY. Now I'm convinced that Cardano, EOS, Universa and Dash will do the same.
LTC will be out of the top 50.
they are getting so mad its hilarious. theres literally nothing they can do
He said children were dying as an argument for his solution, which in his mind saves children's lives.
Snap out of it.
>He said children were dying as an argument for his solution, which in his mind saves children's lives.
Watch the debate.
As I said, you might be interested in getting tested for ADHD, it doesn't look like you are able to sustain attention for long periods of time. This could be impairing your listening comprehension.
I did.
Ver said "children are dying" as an argument in favor of his solution.
He didn't say that. But I'm not going to repeat what I posted earlier, you won't change your mind.
Try to watch the debate again. Take a deep breath and try to understand what he is saying, calmly. Maybe you can rewind the video and watch the important parts more than once until you get it. Best of luck.
>2015 Roger Ver's first attempt to co-opt Bitcoin is when he started Bitcoin XT, using blocksize arguments. It failed.
>He didn't say that.
He brought up the fact that children were dying in a direct confrontation between two versions of Bitcoin.
That is pure lunacy.
Cashies are completely retarded. This thread proves it once again.
At this point, it's either that corekeks have sub 70 iq, or it's really cashies pretending to be corekek retards to lower the trust in btc even further.
Off to a slow start but this will still be a good year for BCH