WHY DOES THIS ASSHOLE HAVE TO GET POLITICAL?

THE FUCKING BCASH FAGGOT IS HURTING HIS INVESTORS

CAN HE JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY

Attached: Untitled.png (737x733, 590K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PUgD1RWw-8w
faz.net/aktuell/
faz.net/aktuell
faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/nach-angriffen-in-syrien-putin-fordert-sondersitzung-des-un-sicherheitsrates-15541657.html
armscontrol.org/factsheets/Timeline-of-Syrian-Chemical-Weapons-Activity
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

t. jew driving americans into conflicts to enforce jewish world hegemony

His post is anti war/intervention brainlet

WTF I UNIRONICALLY LOVE ROGER VER NOW

Attached: 1514794591611.png (760x400, 381K)

look at the motherfucker with his gold
he's just happy being there with his gold
lets bomb him and take his gold

HE WAS T.JEW OP YOU FAGGOT LOL YOURE THE BRAINLET

BASED FUCKING CRYING CONVICT. BCASH #1. BCASH #1. BCASH #1

this angers soros.

t. newfag

Attached: spengbab.jpg (1000x688, 105K)

roger is about to nuke bcash. fuck yea.

I've been asking relatively smart people, boomers and the like who don't speak english and operate out of any internet filter bubble, their opinion on Assad attacking civilians with nerve gas and a surprisingly large number of them indepedently come to the conclusion the story stinks.
Being a millenial and calling out the false flag is virtue-signaling you're above 2 digits IQ, because honestly if you're here and can't see that shit you're braindead. The day saying 2 + 2 = 4 is considered political, perhaps you should grab your balls and get political.

Prove that Assad hasn't used it?

post yfw Roger Ver is actually a stand up guy and fighting the good fight.

But BCH is garbage :S

ROGER VER NAME THE JEW

I love this guy now

you made the decision to join the sjw crowd when you became a bitch for roger "i identify as the real bitcoin" ver.

that's literally the opposite of how justice works

Prove that he did.

Fuck, why can't this bcash guy just conform to our government war doctrine and shut up already?

ASSAD MURDERS BABIES ROGER VER SUPPORTS HIM AFTER SELLING BOMBS ONLINE THAT COULD KILL BABIES.

REALLY MAKES YOU THINK

Attached: article-2398691-1B6450B4000005DC-43_634x451.jpg (634x451, 68K)

If you think assad is behind this you are retarded

He’s a dictator, guilty until proven inncoent I say.

Punished Ver is going nuclear. I can’t wait for him to build outer haven

I GOT RAPED IN PRISON OKAY!

btw, Assad can't just relocate his enemies to another one of his cities. He has to eliminate them, aka: gas them.

Attached: bcashhh.jpg (1280x720, 79K)

political brainlet detected

If you are a shill against peer to peer electronic cash you are sellng out your friends, family and future generations by acting against the adoption of decebtralised currency. All war, poverty and societal degeneration is caused by currency debasement.
Whatever you are making to shill is trivial to gains you would receive from global adoption of a decentraliswd currency. You are subhuman and should be ashamed of your pathetic existence if you are a shill

why the fuck should anyone listen to what you have to say when you're willing to dismiss a founding principal of western law.

>muh babbies
Do you just turn your brain off when you see photos of dead kids?
Prove that the chemical attacks originated from Assad instead of rebels.

You're correct good man. Only the western allies have the license to kill babies with bombs. If Ver is not with us he is against us

>cryptocurrencies are not innately political

Attached: 1513483180302.png (645x729, 80K)

Tell me the logic behind Assad using chemical weapons just as ISIS almost is defeated in the city. Even if you assume he’s a psychopath, why would it be a smart strategy? It makes no sense. How do you know ISIS or another terrorist organization didn’t do it to make Assad look bad? That would actually make sense strategically.

Bullish. Reminds me of when Vitalik tweeted about CP then ETH went on a bullrun. Just bought 100K BCASH.

>to make Assad look bad?
No need and doesn't work. He always looks bad and he fucking is, and the world doesn't care.
>why Putin would attack Ukraine? He's not an idiot!
^^ people were saying shit like this. Mostly they knew they're just lying.

Israel killed more babies than Assad. When are we bombing Israel?

I have met with a Syrian in 2010. He told me that there is going to be islamic terror revolution and that all real Syrians are leaving. Few years later... you know, the people in Syria now are not Syrians, they are ISIS. Im sorry for the babies but these people are using them the same way "palestinians" were doing to stage fake photos and videos and appeal on people's feelings. I bet all my money the chemical attack is not real. These people are capable of staging a thousand people theatre.

>Israel killed more babies than Assad
Hate both of them but unlikely to be true.
Israel violated international law like thousands times but no, they didn't kill as many people as Asad did.

Aaaaaand Jow Forums is flooded by russian (?) paid trolls, literally.

^^ probably right in this thread
(Google: olgino trolls)

t. user from Russia

Who the fuck cares? Why is it our problem? Even if Assad planned to nuke the entire country why should we get involved? Will we do the same thing when Israel gets caught again killing a bunch of Palestinian civilians and selling their organs?

Attached: sun tzu on syria and another undisclosed nation.jpg (800x450, 45K)

I never said you must be involved.
Just answered to the retarded "why would Asad do it".

I never asked that though......

broken clock

Nobody gives a fuck about dead Syrian babies. They are just looking for just cause to dethrone Assad and turn Syria into Libya 2.0. All part of the regional destabilization effort promoted by the kikes.

Well, you said
>Israel killed more babies
And I answered to this that this is unlikely.

He phrased the argument poorly. He should have instead asked why Assad would do the very thing certain to provoke retaliatory action? Additionally why would Assad have called for neutral investigations to determine who conducted the attacks if he had actually done it?

>why Assad would do the very thing certain to provoke
Why is he doing
>the very thing
For years already?

I seriously doubt it. That is irrelevant though. Assad is threatening the West so we shouldn't be involved at all.

> they didn't kill as many people as Asad did
Every dead person from 9/11 and aftermath (Iran war ....)

Isn't**

You do realize that multiple chemical attacks supposedly carried out by Assad were later determined by impartial investigators to not have originated from him, right? Why would this time be any different? You seem woefully uninformed on this issue.

type that sentence into google
ffs

remove semites

WTF I love Roger Ver now

Attached: 1521138326497.png (2618x3453, 3.99M)

This is downright laughable. You meet with ONE guy and all of a sudden he's the fucking prophet? Kys

He was part of the royal family of Syria. The guy was going to college in the UK to be a doctor when his brother died and he had to take the throne. Then he was elected. His people support him. After the war he plans to liberalize the country even more. The "moderate rebels" who are fighting him are literally ISIS (and not even Syrian) and ALL the countries’ Christians support him because Syria has been a multi-religious country for centuries and if the ISIS/Israel/American/"moderate rebel" side wins the Christians are going to be massacred on live tv while jews all tell us "Well it could have been worse, goy. If Assad was still alive he would be gassing more babies."
fucking kys retarded faggot

This. Assad is a tragic hero: fucking western-educated eye doctor/gentle philosopher thrown into a position he didn't seek. One of the only sound men on the world stage.

he's right you know.

>obummer in office
>gas attack claims
>he condems it but don't invade
>Jow Forums cried wolf expecting him to invade because "stupid like nigger"
>Trump gets the same card
>actually attacks despite being a self proclaimed isolationist anti war hawk (unlike shillary apparently) after proving Israel's survival and power is his first priority
>"MAGA BASED MR PRESIDENT TEACH THAT EVIL FAGGOT!"

thanks just bought 100k bcash

Since most middle eastern wars are started by Israel, they own all the dead babies for those. Since they took part in 9/11, they own all the dead babies from those conflicts too. And since they don’t keep an accurate count of how many babies they kill and they are lying kikes by nature, I would say it’s quite likely they killed many times more babies than Syria. What do you think Syria’s dead baby count even is? And based on what?

Hell, the Israel-supported White Helmets actually killed a baby on camera by injecting a massive syringe into its chest, but said they were saving it from chemical exposure, which is obvious staged bullshit. You can look it up on youtube. Watch a White Helmet kill a baby and tell me I am supporting the baby killer. Read the stories about what ISIS does when they take over a town and tell me I am supporting the baby killer you sick evil fuck.

Those babies were killed by White Helmets, i.e. Israel-supported terrorists with cameras who are promoted as good guys by our media. You are using pictures of dead babies to argue against using our brains to figure out who is actually responsible for the dead babies.

>people defending assad literally pulls the HE DINDU NUFFIN HE A GOOD BOY EH WENT TO COLLEGE AND SHIET card
Toppest of kek to you delusional faggots

Not only did Obama launch middle strikes, his intervention created a presence of U.S. soldiers in the pseduo-advisory role in the first place. It was Obama’s idea to arm and fund “moderate rebels.” At one point we had insurgents backed by the Pentagon fighting insurgents backed by the CIA. The wheels of the Deep State turn no matter who is “driving.”

wtf I'm a cashy now

You mean Reagan? Because he signed the bill that gave CIA unlimited power to "support" rebel cells across the world. Obama, as with Bush and Trump simply continued the policy.

We haven't had a good president since Jackson.

back to CNN

I don't like him, but he's right. I agree though, that it makes him a bad marketer.

Attached: 1523382162363.jpg (640x360, 49K)

He's not wrong, but it still doesn't make him any less of a pussy faggot jew

I prefer to have fun with fun crypto projects such as this...
youtube.com/watch?v=PUgD1RWw-8w

... rather than concern with petty Roger vs everyone else debates

Attached: Crypto Substance CRYPTOPOLAND.png (680x670, 1.18M)

Reminder that Ver isn't the CEO of Bcash and he can do whatever the fuck he wants.

Attached: Roger_Ver_Borders_header.png (1500x1086, 1.72M)

Look this image is fucking dumb, because it doesn't consider the opposite perspective at all. The rebels broke off negotiations about a surrender/truce, Trump announces to leave Syria which makes an intervention less likely and now what does Assad do? Drop gas on the city and look at it, they surrendered one or two days later. What an epic rebel false flag to fuck themselves off their own territory...for what? It was never to be expected for more than non-strategic western military attacks on Assad's regime and by all measures destroying chemical weapons and anything related to their use/storage/production was the right thing to do.

Why people are talking about WAR and intervention is completely beyond me as these were never on the table at fucking all.

source for your claims pls

source for your claims pls

We gonna play the good'ol proofsta game?

The US is currently engaged in a trade war with China, who is allied with Russia and Syria. Russia has been blamed for years by our leaders for manipulation in foreign affairs (as if the US is totally innocent of that themselves). Russians have been warning the US to leave te fighting in Syria to them yet the US won't. All this while making laws and promises to Israel to provoke Iran any way they can. Also while threatening nuclear war on North Korea. The US is aggitating every single member of it's enemie's bloc. How is war not inevitable if this keeps up?

Attached: 1523445119240.png (597x415, 51K)

>Why people are talking about WAR and intervention is completely beyond me as these were never on the table at fucking all.
explain or source

Nice tweet. Shows how much we can make of all this.
Missile strike took forever to be organized and happened to be far from an irrational uncoordinated attack.
Russia didn't intercept a single missile, because they actually agree that Assad is acting out of line and they know he his using chemical weapons.
Threatening nuclear war on NK has proven to be quite effective as there are now more talks with NK than ever before. The results we will only know in a couple of months.
China trade war is its own affair, but I agree that the pacific is becoming hotter in terms of influence clashing.
Iran is getting jewed which is sad, I agree with that. Fuck jews.

What am I to explain here? There was never another option than missile strikes on the table. There was never anything else threatened, only the targets were a mystery until today, but even then Macron had already signaled that they will strike chemical capacities which he even happened to have a phone call with Putin about. Military channels between Russia and USA were open at all times.

faz.net/aktuell/ Here is my source. Just read all articles related to Syria.

those sandniglets are not dead, they're just wearing make up and have been told to play dead

>faz.net/aktuell
Hahahahaha

>my source of disinfo is better than yours
Thanks for the heads up.

>trying to prevent the deaths of innocent people by the government that supposedly represents you is "political"
wew lad

Whenever US hegemony ends Israel and all those filthy kike inhabitants are going to be genocided once and for all by the surrounding Arabs. Might take another couple hundred years but it will happen eventually.

stop spreading your trash mixtape on this board, it's ear cancer faggot.

>faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/nach-angriffen-in-syrien-putin-fordert-sondersitzung-des-un-sicherheitsrates-15541657.html

Contradictions everywhere.
Did you chek my ip and just assume my nationality? Die Linie "they actually agree that Assad is acting out of line and they know he his using chemical weapons" ist dermassen typisch für den deutsch-amerikanischen Propagandazweig. Ansonsten stimme ich deinem reply an
zu.

Hopefully soon

Based

He's right you know

Lol, I was talking to a syrian refugee just yesterday (am dutch) and his story is the same. Dude is a christian and almost lost his head because his name is literally Christian. Isis are fucking savages.

Anyway, I trust eye witness accounts from people who were actually there over the stories the (((media))) pushes in order to help our greatest ally Israel.

>mid tier shill or misguided but well meaning new friend

obama tried to put boots on the ground but was met with massive protest in 2014, it seems he was pretty much bush 2; electric boogaloo. But a black version, i guess i'd call it electric bush boogaloo; dubya's back in black.

yerrp pretty much a black dubya.

armscontrol.org/factsheets/Timeline-of-Syrian-Chemical-Weapons-Activity

>THIS TIME ITS DIFFERENT
yeah okay

Ich bin Deutscher und habe deswegen auf die FAZ verwiesen. Die sind immer noch um einiges weniger hysterisch als Anglopresse.

> Die Linie "they actually agree that Assad is acting out of line and they know he his using chemical weapons" ist dermassen typisch für den deutsch-amerikanischen Propagandazweig.
At first I was also rather inclined to believe that this whole incident was a false flag, but theses are the reasons I am not going to believe the Russian version:
>blocked all attempts at letting the OPCW continue their business in Syria
>the state of the combat zone (why false flag so late when only one group was left in the city? how did they keep the stockpiles for this in reserve under siege? for what purpose when you agree to gtfo 2 days later?)
>"Why would Assad do this, he has won xD", but he actually hasn't won yet and those sieges take forever to finish (although obviously he has strategically won, why not drop some gas to finish more quickly. he assumed it wouldn't have any repercussions due to trump signalling wanting to get out and that made at least a proper land invasion extremely unlikely just like having russia's backing)
>Russia didn't attempt to intercept the missiles

Let's assume it was a false flag by rebels:
>gas self or act like it happened
>lose city
>west makes insignificant strikes in relation to own cause

Let's assume it was western intelligence:
>paint assad as war criminal(which he already is anyways since the beginning of the war)
>waste billions of dollar to destroy three houses
>not even attacking the "true" enemies Iran and Russia
That will show'em!

It was a justified strike against Assad to uphold the international regulations in regards to chemical weapons. I know just taking the Russian version might sound more comfy at times and western media appears war crazed and is also lying, but this one is obvious in my opinion.

shit
i hated him at first
but he IS CRYPTO JESUS§

Anyone bringing up israel as an argument can be summarily ignored and disregarded

Youre so fucking transparent lmao its sad really

kys kike

Attached: 1516152795105.jpg (317x293, 49K)

Unironically just bought BCH for the first time ever thanks to Roger's tweet.

>pump bch

Attached: firmbutfair.png (615x1965, 742K)

Am I in Jow Forums? I thought here is Jow Forums

welcome to /bizpol/ fella

He has a point tho
Throughout history western intervention in the middle east has only brought more war and will continue to do so
Let the countries settle their own wars

>Trump announces that he's pulling out of Syria
>Assad bizarrely attacks his own people with chemical weapons

Really gets the noggin joggin'

Attached: 1474283796332.png (358x242, 104K)