Partners with amazon

>partners with amazon
>dumps 20%
>partners with google
>dumps 20%
>partners with apple
>dumps 20%
>get accepted as a worldwide payment option
>dumps 20%

fucking joke of a coin. give me one reason why you hold this piece of shit

Attached: Request-Network[1].jpg (1920x1080, 11K)

Other urls found in this thread:

etherscan.io/token/0x8f8221afbb33998d8584a2b05749ba73c37a938a#balances
etherscan.io/token/0xd850942ef8811f2a866692a623011bde52a462c1#balances
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/ge-s-2017-loss-widens-as-results-restated-after-accounting-shift
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

In hopes of breaking even one day.

just sell and cut your losses. every single coin is mooning while this shits the bad.

fucking look at omg or poe

Because a generous user gave some REQ to me for Free, Hey user if you're there...Thanks

we moonin

why doo

op sold

>up 3%
>"moon"

the state of reqtards

Yeah I made a thread like this some days ago.. at this rate of progression and development and because everyone who holds req lives only by one rule and that is "le sell the news" meme, we will hit price singularity of one satoshi when you get a paymment request for the 2 apples you bought at a farmer's market.

15% you retard

>req it
>hes reqt
>burn his tokens
>he thinks he is looking money
>he is buying LINK
>get y combinator on the line
>make them transfer 250,000,000 LINK
>dump it on binance
>its dumped
>buy binance
>their funds are not safe
>initiate WW3 FUD
>exchange all tokens to BTC
>transfer to BitMEX
>long bitcoin
>pump it

Attached: C01B547C-68D2-4237-B301-5B0147601459.jpg (255x197, 20K)

look at verge
>getting hacked
>pumps
>getting hacked for 3 days
>pumps
>hardforks accidently
>pumps
>does nothing
>pumps

Refute this

Attached: req.png (1603x859, 82K)

memelinespointingtheotherway.png

Auditor here. Overall I believe there's a few accounting entries that req might have trouble with, but other than that I believe most accounting journal entries can be automated. Don't call it tripple entry accounting because its not. There will be no trebits. It will be double entry bookkeeping over blockchain (hidden 3rd entry), which in itself is revolutionary; for those who aren't in accounting, this is truly a revolutionary project. Anyways, as a question to the req team- Will req comply with IFRS and US GAAP or just IFRS? The accounting side of this project is why im invested in req. If req does comply with US gapp, does the business thats using req have the option to chose cash, accrual, or modified cash as the basis of accounting? I'm extremely curious. If so, this project is going to the moon. Req is partnered up with pwc so I have no doubts they aren't up top of this getting it figured out, but im just curious if its only IFRS and not US GAAP

Req isn't partnered with PwC, they are partnered with an office of PwC. I can tell you are not a B4 auditor though, so lmaoing at your life

PwC is an LLP you retard, do you even know what that is? If you're partnered with one office, you are in a partnership with PwC. Get owned.

Posts like these only make me more confident in my investment.

This

We need to Keep dumping. There are too many ico whales with millions of req. We need them to slowly sell off so that there are more holders of req instead of concentrated in few hands.

Wrong wrong wrong. For example, was PwC Hong Kong does has absolutely no effect on US PwC offices.

Wrong wrong wrong wrong, I work for PwC and we haven't gotten an email from BoMo letting us know we are working with REQ now. My buddy works in Deloitte's blockchain group, and he said specifically they only have worked with ethereum. Try again retard. Office's are relatively autonomous, but use the overall firm's global infrastructure if need be. Partner's own their offices and operate them. What one partner does is not influenced by another office.

Except the total # of holders has only been increasing.

etherscan.io/token/0x8f8221afbb33998d8584a2b05749ba73c37a938a#balances

There are also far more people with millions of VEN compared to those with millions of REQ, and they have the same total supply.

etherscan.io/token/0xd850942ef8811f2a866692a623011bde52a462c1#balances

You're stupid because the only people that are holding long term are the whales that own the most, while the people that dump are the pajeets that have a few thousand.

I've been increasing my stack over the past few weeks and I'm up to 137,800ish. My rank naturally moved up on its own a few times as well.

This has nothing to do with who owns the coin.

Wrong, wrong, wrong YOU'RE A LIAR, MY dad works for NINTENDO, and he said the revolution will be VR ENABLED! DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS!?

Lol jimmy you're so stupid!!!

I'm going to assume you are also not a public accountant and do not work at a B4 firm. Which is obvious because you have no idea how a partnership with a global firm would work. I'll give you a hint, one office doesn't open the door to the entire global network.

But I do, I work at Deloitte and I've heard the janitors mention REQ a few times, so fuck off.

Wrong Deloitte is only using ethereum at the moment.

PwC France is PwC. PwC China is PwC. PwC (Enter country of your choice here) is PwC. If you go to PwCs website and do some research you'll see that: "PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity."

To say that PwC france isn't worthy of praise is a completely false and inaccurate peice of rhetoric. PwC is PwC, no matter which office you go to. PwC France pulls in A LOT of revenue, and to say that the REQ partnership with PwC France isn't a "true PwC" partnership is just laughable fud.

Not FUD because, wait for it, a partnership with PwC hongkong or PwC France would mean no immediate implementation for PwC USA. So like what's the fucking point? The big companies are in the US. Europe's revenues are 3/4 what the US's is. US leads PwC's rev.

But you're wrong because I've explicitly talked to the vice president about REQ last week.

Req $100 eoy check it mofos !

nice digits

Youre understating the revenue PwC France pulls in. Once Req proves itself it will branch out. Wait and see.

I'm not understating shit, I'm looking at rev figures posted by PwC for FY17. Literally lol.

Deloitte has been using but unfortunately we switched to IBM's hyperledger for our most recent prototype as it was faster.

I'm a Deloitte employee.

>Youre understating the revenue PwC France pulls in. Once Req proves itself it will branch out. Wait and see.

Attached: 2vg9Wcl.jpg (500x500, 71K)

Glad to see some of us B4 people representing. These NEET's are screaming and crying, they can't understand that it is unlikely to be a partnership with an entire global network, like a small bespoke group within an office in a big city. Furthermore, as someone proposed, will this even be kosher for GAAP and IFRS.

how do i check the rankings of token holders?

16 billion vs 12 billion. Let me guess, you didn't even look it up did you? Fucking lol'd.

Attached: Screenshot_20180414-102225.png (1440x2880, 259K)

Sell low and buy high.
Have fun staying poor stupid,
Smelly dumb nigger.

I'll walk you through this slowly. here is my post
>Europe's revenues are 3/4
now we can refer to your post
>16 billion vs. 12 billion
now with some hard math of 16 times 3, then divided by 4. You are brought to 12 billion dollars. There for, PwC WESTERN EUROPE (more countries than just france) has 3/4 the revenue of PwC Americas.

Req partnered with PwC in France because req is in france. Plus pwc has their blockchain research center in France. Any tech they want to implement will be across the entire global company.

on...the same page that I linked? Click on token holders and just go down the list.

Wrong, unless they get some serious work done in respect to GAAP and IFRS. REQ is years from actual accounting implementation

you are wasting your time arguing with idiots that cannot into basic math or logic. welcome to Jow Forums
>that being said, req IS a shitcoin and you should not invest in it. but what do I know

All my arguments being said, I would love for REQ to get accounting implementation. Would make my life better

Of course they are years away as is nearly every crypto and every new development. Doesn't mean pwc in France isn t s great deal for them.

I get it you retard. You said 3/4's as if it was only like 500 million. Its fucking 12 billion! Who cares at that point. You were downplaying and not being transparent about the total revenue figures.

I'll be happy with $10. $100 and I'll buy a house and a tall leggy wife who will have to hide her disgust with a fake smile as she fucks my short fat ass

nah dude, they are years away from GAAP and IFRS. do you know how fucking annoying compliance shit is? GAAP and IFRS makes changes on a yearly basis and its not stagnant like laws or something where they set it and thats it.

Look up the shitshow that is the changes in Rev Rec and Leases, its costing companies low millions to come back into compliance.

You gotta go back

there you go

Attached: meme lines lul.png (1603x859, 98K)

Fucking hope this is true. Might finally reach 1 million REQ if this happens.

This post scares me because I already know the shitshow these new revenue recognition standards are causing. Well damn. You've basically answered my original question. Im starting to realize we might be a decade away from automated accounting.

Im not even fudding, just lets be super realistic. Apple didnt blow the phone marketwide open day 1, it took a few years. Shit will take time and then till be great.

to give non-public accounting fags an idea:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/ge-s-2017-loss-widens-as-results-restated-after-accounting-shift

You dont have to tell me, im in public accounting, fag. Im glad im not the only one on here that is.

>Wrong wrong wrong
Repeating a statement doesn't make it any more true.

kek

Trump disagrees