Why are the Finns so similar to the Asians? are there historical preconditions for this?
Dickhole
Evan James
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Angel Young
wasn't The Ukraine conquered by Turkic people?
Landon Lopez
No, i think
Liam Stewart
wasn't Australia settled by criminals?
Blake Torres
because
Gavin Rogers
In the 9th century the Pechenegs began a period of wars against Kievan Rus'. For more than two centuries they had launched raids into the lands of Rus', which sometimes escalated into full-scale wars (like the 920 war on the Pechenegs by Igor of Kiev, reported in the Primary Chronicle). The Pecheneg wars against Kievan Rus' caused the Slavs from Walachian territories to gradually migrate north of the Dniestr in the 10th and 11th centuries.[36] Rus'/Pecheneg temporary military alliances also occurred however, as during the Byzantine campaign in 943 led by Igor.[37] In 968 the Pechenegs attacked and besieged Kiev; some joined the Prince of Kiev, Sviatoslav I, in his Byzantine campaign of 970–971, though eventually they ambushed and killed the Kievan prince in 972. According to the Primary Chronicle, the Pecheneg Khan Kurya made a chalice from Sviatoslav's skull, in accordance with the custom of steppe nomads. The fortunes of the Rus'-Pecheneg confrontation swung during the reign of Vladimir I of Kiev (990–995), who founded the town of Pereyaslav upon the site of his victory over the Pechenegs,[38] followed by the defeat of the Pechenegs during the reign of Yaroslav I the Wise in 1036. Shortly thereafter, other nomadic peoples replaced the weakened Pechenegs in the Pontic steppe: the Cumans and the Torks. According to Mykhailo Hrushevsky (History of Ukraine-Ruthenia), after its defeat near Kiev the Pecheneg Horde moved towards the Danube, crossed the river, and disappeared out of the Pontic steppes.
Owen Turner
After centuries of fighting involving all their neighbours—the Byzantine Empire, Bulgaria, Kievan Rus', Khazaria, and the Magyars—the Pechenegs were annihilated as an independent force in 1091 at the Battle of Levounion by a combined Byzantine and Cuman army under Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos. Alexios I recruited the defeated Pechenegs, whom he settled in the district of Moglena (today in Macedonia) into a tagma "of the Moglena Pechenegs". Attacked again in 1094 by the Cumans, many Pechenegs were slain or absorbed. The Byzantines defeated the Pechenegs again at the Battle of Beroia in 1122, on the territory of modern-day Bulgaria. For some time, significant communities of Pechenegs still remained in the Kingdom of Hungary. With time the Balkan Pechenegs lost their national identity and became fully assimilated, mostly with Magyars and Bulgarians.
In the 12th century, according to Byzantine historian John Kinnamos, the Pechenegs fought as mercenaries for the Byzantine Emperor Manuel I Komnenos in southern Italy against the Norman king of Sicily, William the Bad. A group of Pechenegs was present at the battle of Andria in 1155.
The Pechenegs were last mentioned in 1168 as members of Turkic tribes known in the chronicles as the "Chorni Klobuky (Black Hats)".
Anthony Wilson
>The Pechenegs or Patzinaks[4] were a semi-nomadic Turkic people from Central Asia speaking the Pecheneg language which belonged to the Oghuz branch of Turkic language family.[5] Three of the ruling clans of the Pechenegs were the Kankalis/Kangli.
Thomas Evans
Owen Bennett
>The Kipchaks were a Turkic nomadic people and confederation that existed in the Middle Ages, inhabiting parts of the Eurasian Steppe. First mentioned in the 8th century as part of the Turkic Khaganate, they most likely inhabited the Altai region from where they expanded over the following centuries, first as part of the Kimek Khanate and later as part of a confederation with the Cumans. There were groups of Kipchaks in the Pontic–Caspian steppe, Syr Darya and Siberia. The Cuman–Kipchak confederation was conquered by the Mongols in the early 13th century.
Noah King
Samuel Taylor
en.wikipedia.org
>The Siege of Kiev by the Mongols took place between November 28 and December 6, 1240, and resulted in a Mongol victory. It was a heavy moral and military blow to Halych-Volhynia and allowed Batu Khan to proceed westward into Europe.
Nathan Torres
Luke Jackson
Mainly the prehistorical reason called migration
William Kelly
Connor Lee
>Sami wives/sex slaves
James Russell
Yes, out of two compass points we have affinity towards East. How's the weather over there?
Daniel Lewis
Around 20% of our population can trace its ancestry to convicts
Easton Scott
Finns have at most 10% Sami maternal lines.
Meanwhile...Swedish maternal lines make up some half or more.
Do the math.
Matthew Rivera
crimea was owned by the ottomans. it was also puppeted by the mongols and became a khanate.
James Jenkins
Are you stupid in the head much? Yes, mitochondrial haplogroups W, Z and D5 most likely describe the primary source of the Asiatic pulse among Finns. And Finns don't have Swedish maternal lines in general. The clades are different. Haplogroupwise we are approaching Estonians of all people.
Isaiah Stewart
Hwan rapebabies
Nathaniel Cruz
Europe turns you white. All the Africans pouring in to Europe now, will be white AF within a few centuries. It's the latitude. All the latinos and blacks in northern most part of america will experience the same thing.
Owen Wilson
Didn't 30 Spaniards walk in and conquer Peru?
Thomas Phillips
Satakunta has high rates of R1b and R1a by Finnish standards so we can make the assumption that they have even more Germanic maternal lines since Finnic people were traditionally patriarchal and patrilocal.