I heard many stories about Whitto Westerners committing massacre/slaverize toward Africans and Native Americans

I heard many stories about Whitto Westerners committing massacre/slaverize toward Africans and Native Americans,

but I rarely heard they did the same to East Asians when they were having superior power.

Why?

Attached: HongKong.png (963x477, 1.11M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_von_Ungern-Sternberg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

let me find some cases that I can classify white people' committing massacre toward East Asians.

but there could be found only really really rare cases. It couldnt compared what they did to Africans or Native Americans.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_von_Ungern-Sternberg
This Crazy Russian man used to kill random mongolian civilians.

Attached: Unger.png (510x335, 422K)

Study some world history and say something in this thread you cheese rotten brain fucks.

dont you feel even sad to yourself posting black/asian girls pictures again and again. just for nothing.
not learning any practical relationship or history.

neck yourself.

gook haha

The Western slave trade happened at the start of industrial scale agriculture when people found out large scale farming is more profitable but the machines needed to do this were still unproven. So they needed cheap manpower and the slave trade ramped up. Before this, slaves were a luxury and treated better since they were an investment, not a commodity.

Well, I don't know anything about slavery in Europe during times when the West started direct contacts with you and started colonization of Asia. It were only Americans who used slave labour by that time and it was due to their current economical situation.

Africans were viewed by them as subhumans. Even Africans realized that currently they can't be a winning side in comparison with whities, so they were easy to enslave.

On the other hand, I can't see how a Chinese guy can be enslaved by Europeans/Americans. He's not barbarian who eats people and worships cocks.

Portuguese sailors bought a few Japanese slave girls in the 16th-17th century.

Portugues enslaved some Chinese and Japanese.

I'm here. It probably comes from respect/Africans actually enslaved themselves. We just bought them.

As for Native Americans, they were literally still in the stone age and hadn't discovered even swords yet. And North American natives who were pretty peaceful just died to Diseases from europeans that they weren't exposed to. Central and Southern American Native Americans were pretty violent in their culture and the same thing - disease killed fucking all of them. And as I said before, there just wasn't the same level of respect.

You go to Asia and you honestly see legitimate intelligence, Architecture, law, art, farming (FARMING goddamnit nobody else did this) etc. And perhaps it wasn't as easy/a bit more fucked up.

Basically, Africans were selling themselves and Native Americans had very valuable land and the political climate at the time many wanted to immigrate from Europe for various reasons. And it was """""easy"""""(er).

East Asian "males" like you and me deserve to be enslaved by the White man. If we're good slaves our masters may even reward us with their big White cocks!

Attached: 1523848020712.jpg (1536x1080, 219K)

Shut the fuck up Singapore.
you fuck off from my white masters dick it's only mine. fuck off from it. is only mine.

slavery was easy with africa because the west african despotic governments would have no problem sending their political prisoners and criminals away to slavery for modern firearms in return, it solved two problems at once
eastern asian states were far more organized and insular, allowing these institutions to resist these deals
also, the main reason why slavery was even permitted by the religious institutions of the time was due to claims of african inferiority, and they were identified as subhumans, whereas with east asian peoples, there wasn't near as much inferiority placed on them, and instead there was even praise for their stability, organization of labour and the whole orientalist perspective of eastern mysticism
the first time when a western power could actually subjugate and/or massacre a people was after China basically stopped technologically progressing for hundreds of years and basically everyone was on heroin

cringe

feel sad.
even though there was some time that Oriental power dominant, orientals didnt do any beneficial to the outside of our ground.

mongols only destroyed all of the achievements. while english and french people improved standard of living and education for another side of world.
shame.

retard

>A mexican calling others retarded

You really shouldn't play that game

africans and native americans didn't produce anything significant (except for maybe the iroquois early on), so it was only profitable to replace them, while east asians produced goods that the west wanted (tea, porcelain, silk, etc.) so it was more profitable to let them live and sell them opium for their desired products. Wars and massacres are more expensive than selling drugs after all.

>1920s
>Japan becomes colonial power
>"we must unite Asia against evil white empires"
>"we are all asian brothers & sisters, unite!"
invades, slaughters and subjugates all of asia

Attached: 1376398598532.jpg (500x722, 75K)

Japs have done worse than ever any white nation did to East Asia.

You being ignorant != Reality

then bring any explanation and cases that I don't know you fuck. you bring no any clue and start blame out of nowhere.

>It were only Americans who used slave labour by that time and it was due to their current economical situation.

Attached: 5755446C-F8DA-4B0F-995A-4A472DE29925.png (645x729, 90K)

So much this. We only imported like 4-5% or something of all slaves.

lots of terrible things happened in the past
Australia was a dumping ground for Britain's prisoners!
but it is the past now, lets be friends :3

I don't think being given a continent for almost free compares to what Japan did to Korea