>Westerners always say Japan copied it's culture from China
>Westerners never say China copied it's culture from India
There is a pro-Chinese conspiracy going on here
>Westerners always say Japan copied it's culture from China
>Westerners never say China copied it's culture from India
There is a pro-Chinese conspiracy going on here
rangeban japan
Everybody copied from someone at some point.
>Westerners don't know about Bi Sheng
this
1 chinese buddhist isn't the same as indian buddhism
2 buddhism isn't the only aspect of chinese culture
3 it was the kushans who spread buddhism to china, unlike chinese monks who went to japan
You should be grateful the Chinese are prevented from too often accessing Western sites, otherwise we'd be flooded with them.
Fool, you will never silence the eternal English teacher. Woopity bop hop skippity doo
I think China copy a lot from Japan as well.
Many stereotypical Chinese things like Zen Buddhism, King Fu etc comes from India
The idea of pagodas come from Indian stupas desu~
Lol, Indian philosophy and culture are closer to European than they are Chinese
>King Fu comes from India
what the actual FUCK
LOL
There's nothing wrong with being derivative.
Japan copied its culture from China like x European country copied its culture from Y European country. As in: people are fucking idiots.
not really. they literally took and copy our language, architecture, science, ethic, culture and did nothing to improve that
Copying something, and migrating from one place to another, and having the culture, language, etc. that you brought with you, evolve into something distinctly different, sometimes to the point of being relatively entirely different--are two completely different things.
You are basically saying Mandarin and Japanese are the same language. They sure as fuck are not.
Your cultures etc. are similar to each other in the ways that German and Italian culture are similar: You are both part of the same group of people--but you are each your own sub-group.
>they literally took and copy our language, architecture, science, ethic, culture and did nothing to improve that
At least we maintained it unlike China which let it to ruin.
>Kanji. China destroyed it and uses Simplified ugly characters
>Architecture. Walk around Japan and you will find traditional houses and buildings everywhere. In China it's all commieblocks
>ethic. Chinese barely practice Confucianism. No societal harmony and everyone is rude. Japan is truly Confucian. China is barbarian Mongol-Manchu culture
Also, 六四天安門事件
>kanji
then wtf is those childish scribble in between our beautiful invented characters that is your written language?
>architecture
outside of the city are beautiful traditional chinese building that you copied exactly
>everyone is rude
LMAO this is so stupid I cannot even respond
What exactly did “China” take from “India”? You get that these concepts of nations did not even exist in the bronze age?
By this logic Buddha was Nepalese and Japan/Korea/Vietnam/China copied Nepal.
It's precisely Confucius' fault that foreigners screw your women though.
>kung fu comes from India
Kill yourself retard
And Japan did not simplify Kanji a hundred times now?
六四天安門事件
六四天安門事件
Do Chinese people ever bow out of respect? Are they quit on public transit as to not disturb others? Do they avoid throwing trash and spitting on the street to keep country clean?
Yes, China is veeeery Confucian
How?
yes we do all that things. You just see the very few bad ones and then report it to the world because that's how pathetic you are
The founder of Kungfu (Bodhidharma) was literally an Indian man.
He transmitted South Indian martial art to China.
even worse, westerns never say what they copied from china and india. Is a lot
Yeah all 1.4 billion Chinese
Absolutely no overlap between rude Japanese and kind Chinese. They are completely separate and no Japanese is as rude as any Chinese.
Why do Chinese people do nothing when someone gets hit by a car?
Yeah I recently learned toothbrush was invented in China and copied by Europeans
>Some popular stories[10][11] consider Bodhidharma as the founder of Shaolin kung fu.
>The idea of Bodhidharma influencing Shaolin boxing is based on a qigong manual written during the 17th century. This is when a Taoist with the pen name "Purple Coagulation Man of the Way" wrote the Sinews Changing Classic in 1624, but claimed to have discovered it. The first of two prefaces of the manual traces this qigong style's succession from Bodhidharma to the Chinese general Li Jing via "a chain of Buddhist saints and martial heroes."[12](p165) The work itself is full of anachronistic mistakes and even includes a popular character from Chinese fiction, the "Qiuran Ke" ("Bushy Bearded Hero)" (虬髯客), as a lineage master.[13] Literati as far back as the Qing Dynasty have taken note of these mistakes. The scholar Ling Tinkang (1757–1809) described the author as an 'ignorant village master'."[12](p168)
So your entire claim comes from a 17th century manual? Over a millenia after the Buddhist monk arrived?
Why do Americans do nothing when hundreds of schoolchildren are shot each year?
It's the price we pay
>kushans
China is BLACK
China is BLACK and that is good.
This butthurt Japoid can off himself and save us from his shitposts
all women are confucian by that logic, my brodawg
fuckers copy and steal a lot.
and they say we are the one that are copy and steal. It's actually reverse.
Who cares about copying? It's healthy for humanity to progress. The more you share, the faster humanity will progress. Egoistic cunts btfo
but is overwhelming. We could spend days how many things they copied from the rest of the world (mainly china). And stuff they copied and made it pass as their own inventions.
agree , we should stop copyrights.
What about is so different? Chinese people accept the Mahayana scriptures which came from India, Chinese monks follow the vinaya, study sanskrit as a liturgical language, etc.
Any other things like belief in the Jade Emperor and other Chinese figures are peripheral things that have nothing to do with doctrine or practice.
Astronomy, mathematics, religion, etc.
Copyright is for intellectual property. Patents are for innovations and only last a few years to promote "copying" technology while still giving people a reason to innovate.
It's a perfect system and humanity's greatest asset.