>Hitler was racist against Jews
>Churchill was racist against Irish, Indians, Pashtuns, Africans, Jamaicans, Germans, Arabs, Meds, Catholics, Russians, basically everyone except Anglos and Jews
>Hitler is considered the epitome of racism, while Churchill is portrayed as some liberal hero who was anti-racist
Why?
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
Because Churchill "won", Hitler lost.
>Churchill was racist against... basically everyone except Anglos and Jews
nytimes.com
He didn't like Jews either.
This. fpbp
OP is the L*banese who lives in Australia.
this
Churchill was actually not so different from Hitler. Except he wasn't a dictator
>Germany is portrayed as the evil imperialist during the world wars
>meanwhile France + the UK occupy half the world with their Empires
This
All about who won
One tried to KILL all of them
The other, despite hating them, tried saving them.
>>Churchill is portrayed as a liberal hero
>if i say things they become true
Kys dumbass
No it isnt. Churchill didnt try to exterminate entire racial groups. And Hitler wasnt only racist towards Jews. Also racist is a very kind word when referring to Hitler
Yes he was very different
Churchill never tried to exterminate those groups.
Also
>hitler only hated jews
>Churchill was racist against Irish, Indians, Pashtuns, Africans, Jamaicans, Germans, Arabs, Meds, Catholics, Russians, basically everyone except Anglos and Jews
That was just banter
Hitler didn't like us either
this.
history is written by the winners.
i love churchill even more now, thanks op
>~24 millions of slavic civilians get murdered by Germans
>Hitler was racist ONLY towards Jews
Because Anglos propaganda wins
>slavic flags defending shitler
Pathetic, isn't it?
>Hitler was only racist against Jews
Quite sad too
Didn't Curchill advocate for the extermination of the pooinloos during his youth?
Hitler committed a genocide that spiralled into the worst war the world has ever seen. resulting in a total of 73 million deaths worldwide, and, had not been stopped, would have committed genocide against tens of millions more.
Churchill ended that.
Hitler killed some jee
Ws tho but after 12 years of hitler we have millions of "holo****" "survivors"
>Churchill ended that
That life expectancy of tge J*w 12 years and enough energy to sit and have staility and free time to write numerous books.
Hitler killed some J*ws apparently, and even after 12 years of Hitler we have millions of holo*****" survivors.
Racism was considered normal and acceptable back then, in all parts of the world.
But now it isn't, and people don't want their national heroes to look like monsters, so they just put all the blame on Hitler.
I find it funny how antifa talks about nazis losing the war, even though the allies hated other non whites too. US army practised segregation even on foreign soil, with a war going on.
>millions of survivors
World jew pop in 1939 was 6 million, if 6 million were killed then jew pop would be 0%
The holo***** is a lie, there is no holo*****, the holo***** is a lie there us no holo*****.
Germanys government wasnt a murderous rogue state which sought to murder tge world.
It's hard to like someone when they control you.
Last time I checked, Churchill didn't order the extermination of 17,000,000 people based on "muh ethnic cleansing"
this sure is international
>World jew pop in 1939 was 6 million