What do you think about him?

Eh, I consider India to be a failed nation. It's a shithole now and it'll be a shithole the day we die, because the majority of people here are absolutely worthless, and they can all vote. Want to move slum dwellers away? Can't do it because you'll lose votes. Want to punish morons who litter? No can do, because votes.

I am just glad I am not poor, and postgrad abroad is cheap.

Members of his party(BJP) supported rapists who raped and killed a little girl in a temple.Member of his party raped a woman,killed her father when they filed a complaint and BJP tried their best to save the member.
His party members constantly lie and deny that the rapes even happened at all.
All PM Modi does is whataboutery. He says why make such a big deal out of a particular incident etc etc.

And who started the fucking riot?
Did we tell the muzzrats to burn the train?
Did we tell them to murder children?
When they faced retaliation why the fuck are hey using the victim card.
Bunch of losers who prefer to bleat azzan 5 times a day instead of doing something productive. They fill most of the jail because of the crimes they commit, they suicide bomb, derail trains, kill pilligrims and in the end they use a victim card to hide their deeds.

elitist little fucks are the reason india is still a shithole, you will never ever raise it up, you are selfish and greedy, the poor will hang you, just need some time for it

If I someday become PM of this country, I will unironically pay Pakistan to bomb slums and shacks.

>790 muslims killed in riots
>supports rape
>supports killing muslims
He sounds fucking based to me

Attached: 1521596034214.png (349x307, 173K)

I am a 25 year old NEET preparing for govt jobs. So there's no way out for me(also very ill parents).

>All PM Modi does is whataboutery. He says why make such a big deal out of a particular incident etc etc.
When the fuck did Modi said that?
He passed an ordinance for the death of child rapist.
thehindubusinessline.com/news/death-penalty-for-rape-of-children/article23626892.ece

>gives gibs to millions of poor fucks
Nah only baniya gujjews get gibs. India's investment in education and health is garbage, even compared to Sub-saharan africa

Attached: govt spending social services.jpg (696x536, 42K)

He never supported rape.
And the stupid fuck who is butthurt about the ministers, all they did was to support a CBI enquiry and investigation of the alleged “”””””rape”””””

PM Narendra Modi in Karnataka: “Brothers and sisters, the atrocities against Dalits in Karnataka is not hidden from anyone. In neighbouring Bidar, a Dalit girl was raped. The details are still available on social media. I ask those from the Congress who take out candlelight vigils in Delhi – when a Dalit girl is raped in Bidar, where did your candlelight get lost? Where were your leaders then?”

Basic whataboutery

>govt jobs
Are you SC/ST? Because if you are general category, forget about it.

Oh yeah sure, how can you forget the sc/st?
They get the most subsidized fees structure in this whole country still they commit suicide because they can’t keep up with the pace.
Lmao

Attached: 3582971F-9BF4-451F-A3C1-528E16BE2BA9.jpg (309x476, 22K)

I do want ask this though. Whom did you kill in the riots? The people who burnt the train or some pregnant women and her unborn baby? A twelve year old girls and boys, infants, old women,teenagers who had nothing to do with it?

I know what you're going to reply "But they killed our innocents first" without not realizing the idiocy of killing some random infant instead of killing the actual murderers.

I hope you remember pregnant women were raped, the stomachs split open amd the fetus was thrown into the fire.

That is what you're supporting. Then again looking at imbeciles like you, no wonder this country is a shithole.

OBC.

Now they want reservations in private sector and promotions too.

Attached: C6iIkUAVoAIT17q.jpg (1200x720, 59K)

>And here I throw the good ol victim card

Well, good luck. Don't waste too much time on this website.

>And here absolutely I avoid the question and act like an imbecile.

Trying to but haven't overcome procrastination. I guess I should go back and study.

what the fuck does >muh reservations have anything to do with the fact the India's social services is corrupt and and under-funded. Modi promised to continue the MMS's reforms, but gave jumlas instead. Oh wait, the fucktard also managed to ruin the currency supply with demonetization.

>obc
Behenchod you get reservations too.

Wouldn't GST be considered a major reform?

GST was not properly executed neither was demo

Even something as simple as the GST was bundled with insane amount of clauses and categories. India should have adopted the Canada's version of sales tax, with a uniform tax rate with a certain amount allocated to the federal and provincial/state level

>MMS reforms
Lmao what mms reforms? All he did was enjoyed the fruit of economic liberalisation done by Narsimha Rao and ABV and also how can we forget that he was a puppet PM of Antonia Maino and Raul.

ABV made us nuclear sufficient and even took us out from the sactions by the UN.
His Fisical Responsibilty Act brought down fiscal deficit. It boosted public-sector savings which rose from -0.8% of GDP in FY 2000, to 2.3% in FY 2005.

That’s why there are monthly meetings of GST comitee which comprises he CM’s of all states, all the decisions taken by this comitee are responsibility of all CM’s of this country.

Why do upper middle class indians wanna leave? It would be comfy seeing the inequality and make you feel better about yourself everyday. If you went to the west you'd just be another random weird indian.

And how can we forget the made up outrage of “”hurr durr PM mudi sold the Red Fort”” , instead he just privatised it so that bangis don’t write ‘Priya luvs Rahul’ everywhere.

Idgaf about "getting laid" or any of that crap
I just want to work as a data scientist, with reasonable pay and work hours, without all the chaos here

I wanna leave for a medical degree to Mauritius or Russia or China and then return here.

This.
Who even cares for getting laid?
Earn good money and life is good.

Even if you are comfortably middle class, there is guarantee that your kids will enjoy a secure future. Unless if you have a lot of connections. There is no hope for the country, its increasingly getting polluted and overpopulated to the brim with rural fanatics.

there is no guarantee*

lol fuck off

>ABV made us nuclear sufficient and even took us out from the sactions by the UN.
His Fisical Responsibilty Act brought down fiscal deficit. It boosted public-sector savings which rose from -0.8% of GDP in FY 2000, to 2.3% in FY 2005.
And still he was kicked out of power because he didn’t dun enuf to please the lower class community (which is also a majority here). Do these bhangis even know about Fiscal Deficit and growth rate. All they care about is getting gibs from the government and if the gibs stop they’ll riot.
The absolute state of this country.

Not a good person
as simple as that
because this

>openly supports rapes/murder.
>accused mass-murder

now you pajeet lost your country hegemony after Nepal to China because your leader arrogancy

>accused and then acquitted
Lmao

>Sneaky Poland behind the paki flag

go to reddit, SJW.

no one cares about murders here.

Yeah is going to turn India into the hindu version of Pakistan.
India stands no chance of competing with China. It doesn't matter who the PM is

Attached: China string-of-pearls-.jpg (601x353, 42K)

because Indian upper middle class is not = American upper middle class

you need to be rich as fuck here (millions of USD) to enjoy life and never wanna leave. My dad is a richfag and I did my undergrad and MBA from the USA. Lived there for 6-7 years but eventually came back cause I like living here more

for these guys there is no way they can make good money in India because the competition for high paying jobs is so so much and all the smart Indians take them so they go to the west to earn money easilt

What do Indians think about the whole banknote thing?

they lost after decades of hegemony on nepal because modi insisted the 2 nepal provinces full of hindi to be part of india

What?
Source

It's not just about jobs or competition.
You could be the richest person in the world but you'd still be surrounded by shitty public infrastructure and dumb people here.

>modi insisted the 2 nepal provinces full of hindi to be part of india
never heard on anything like that. Nepal's beef with India picked up because India's wanted people in the province to have more representation in Nepal's parliament. India allegedly tried to shut of Nepal's oil/trade access because of this issue.

Indians unironically love him because of demonetization. That should tell you how retarded the country is. Although more and more people have started to come to terms with the fact that it accomplished very little.

kek, it barely matters. A couple of broken roads 10 miles from my home aren't going to make me wanna leave my motherland

I live in South Delhi in a gated bungalow and all the infrastructure within a 5-mile radius is top notch. All my friends live here too and I have every single amenity and luxury in life that any rich westerner would.

I've lived in the USA for almost a decade and life is better in India IMO if you're crorepati status (unless you are living in California)

ah sorry i meant province no. 2
not 2 nepal provinces

i correct my statement again
it's about province no. 2 and also india tried to force nepal to make another provinces special for hindi ethnics

> me wanna leave my motherland
You actually feel attached to this place?

Dude, source.
I am not believing your claim.

To each his own. I think it's better to have a whole city that's as good as a gated community. As soon as I step out of the gates, it's like entering hell.

But people have their own opinions and needs. It's good that you got what you want in life.

That's what you get when you make a "country" out of a geographical entity based on *ngloid imperial territories.

Princely states would probably have been better than republican independence.

Princely states would've been colonised by China

Possibly, but what would China have taken except some parts of the Himalayas?

you would too if you had enough money to not worry about a job for generations. I've lived in the USA, Switzerland, Singapore and been to 40 countries. The only reason that doesn't matter to you rn is cause you want to make money and live the good life

After that, I've come to the conclusion you can never truly feel at home anywhere else. So I made the decision to come back and it's been pretty good. Have USA citizenship so it's easy for me to back too but meh

it won't ever be your own country and you'll always be an outsider

Nvm I got it.

Yes that was diplomatic disaster. But as I've said India can't financially compete with china to buy Nepal. They need to rely on Southern Nepalis (who are sympathetic to India) for support.

Hes talking about the blockade
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Nepal_blockade#Cascading_shortages

I dunno, but India got colonised by UK because it was divided. Splitting up at this point would be suicide. India has a very unfortunate location, with Pakistan and China as neighbours. Maybe if there's peace and prosperity in this region one day, balkanisation could be feasible. But not now.

How many crores you got ?

So what has modiji done compared to Narashima Rao and ABV?

>I've lived in the USA, Switzerland, Singapore and been to 40 countries.
jesus, how old are you?
desu i just want to be left alone, so i don't really care about not belonging.
splitting india into dozens of little countries with their own armies is not a very good idea.

Never trust the Chinese but Pakis would've assraped us if we were divided. I am a southie and I am glad we have the north as a meat shield.

I don't expect my countrymen to reach East Asian tiger development because of insecurity and being stuck in the past. I hate Tamil chauvinism and arrogance more than anything else.

India is "too big to fail", but it's too big to succeed.
The modern era is one in which smaller interests which can orient themselves independently can do a lot, particularly when they don't lack for physical capital like India's regions and historic states do.

>splitting india into dozens of little countries with their own armies is not a very good idea.
Because they'd fight each other, right? But if states and regions ran themselves, would they not come to better arrangements than they do under the central government?

Or are India's problems intractable on the ground level, and not just from the top down?

>desu i just want to be left alone, so i don't really care about not belonging.
Unironically this, All I wanted was proper education, a job that is interesting and maybe a couple of friends but that's too much to ask in this shithole.

>it won't ever be your own country and you'll always be an outsider
I don't think or care much about things that do not affect me directly. Only interested in my career and maintaining the same living standards that I have now. Even if I am able to get a 60lpa job here, the public services and stuff will be terrible.

If nothing goes wrong, I will move to Australia next year. I don't plan to ever set foot in this country again.

>India has a very unfortunate location
nah India has a pretty favorable geography with Himalayas to the north and seas on all three sides. The Indian border isn't as much of a priority to china compared to the the south china sea. India's only real "challenge" is Pakistan. If India can't resolve that then they deserve to be balkanized.

There's no way to resolve it. Both sides want Kashmir and neither of them will budge.

haha enough for me and my kids to never work again and buy whatever they want

not that old lol. I'm 27. Just educated abroad

I guess

India already has a fair amount of autonomy within its states, because of the federalist system. Splitting up country would turn into a warzone like the middle east.
According to Musharraf, India-Pakistan was close to resolving the Kashmir issue under MMS. But the Pakis fucked it up as usual

In 20 years which will be the Top 5 most developed Indian states?(ignoring small ones like Goa and Delhi)

But apart from preventing war, in what regards does having a unified India benefit the subcontinent as a whole, and worse-off regions in particular? Or, to look at the question from the other side, in what is India worse off today for having a unified government?

Hard to tell which states could improve. But India's growth will be confined to major cities like Mumbai/B'lore/Hyderabad, because of network effect. IT/service industry will continue to be the main source of India's growth.

>But apart from preventing war
lol it actually is the only benefit. I agree that the southern/Western Indian states could have seen faster economic growth (comparable to Sri Lanka). But India would be involved in a power struggle between the likes of China/Russia/U.S. if it were divided into smaller states.

The South and West gain a lot by being in the union. Minerals and metals from Bihar and Jharkhand were used for the development of other states. Last year, there was a severe drought in eastern Maharashtra and lots of people would've died if the government had not sent water from Rajasthan

How much has Pakistan advanced beyond the rest of (former/historic/geographic) India by virtue of being cut off/politically independent from the parts that aren't part of its regional/national identity?

it prevents war, that's it. there's nothing more to it.

based paki

Kerala uprising when?

Agreed. Modi's economic policies suck
>Members of his party(BJP) supported rapists who raped and killed a little girl in a temple.Member of his party raped a woman,killed her father when they filed a complaint and BJP tried their best to save the member.
Lies. There was no rape. That temple is single roomed and smaller than a bus

No only the poor ones do. That too very very little

Years ago people seemed to be all over him(like the canadian when he was elected)

i follow some curry journalists though and they all seem to hate him for being a hindu nationalist or something, him not caring about that muslim girl that was raped and murdered was a bit much tbqh

Pakistan historically had higher development and economic growth than India. But they stagnated since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, due to the refugee crisis/terrosim it created and all the political chaos. That being said, despite having lower GDP on paper they still have lower poverty rates than India.

Now gomrade
youtube.com/watch?v=P-yH8bVNnV0

This might be more of a history question than something anyone can answer without specialist knowledge, but how much of what we in the west are told is an "overpopulation" problem with images all of the shanty towns around the huge cities actually a result of freedom of movement between Indian territories that might have otherwise kept their borders up and not attracted millions of poor from other states into their big cities?
Is this a problem of artificial migration and free trade within India or is it just misrule on the city level "refusing" to build good infrastructure to keep up with a population that is in itself sustainable and natural?

>an "overpopulation" problem with images all of the shanty towns around the huge cities.

Overpopulation is mostly a problem in poorly planned cities like Mumbai. Because, Mumbai is surround by hills that prevent it from naturally expanding outward like Delhi. India actually benefits from these crowded megacities. Its their main source of economic growth, since they're too incompetent to develop a strong manufacturing sector like china.

>Overpopulation is mostly a problem in poorly planned cities like Mumbai.
But my main question would be whether the "poor planning" is actually just the rulership in Mumbai being incompetent or malevolent for whatever reason, or a result of circumstances which the city might have not had to face in a different circumstance, such as in this case, the lack of impediment for poor Indians to up sticks and go to the city to compete for a tiny amount of jobs.

The same question asked differently: are the people in the overcrowded slums just the native poor of the cities who always lived there, and the government didn't plan for or fund their wellbeing, or did the slum-dwelling population come from outside the city and wreck the ability of the city governments to plan for this non-natural population growth?
Because in Ireland a fifth of the country lives in Dublin, and almost everything is decided by the city, even though most of the population growth of Dublin and the other cities is due to rural people moving to the cities.

Oh, and what do you mean when you say Delhi is benefiting from having crowded growth despite not having manufacturing?

It's both.

The government doesn't have money to build new cities and improve existing ones the way China does, and there are a lot of migrants from rural areas too.

India did'nt have proper communism, additionally it's not nearly as unified as China in terms of religion, etc.