Why are more Americans willing to die for their country than other “”””civilized””””” countries are for theirs?

oddly similar posts

We are a collective society, not an individual one

Look at how patriotic everyone is on the 4th of July and tell 95% of us wouldn’t die for the USA

fanastic

Attached: gucci mane.png (421x460, 377K)

Thanks for your input Rodriguez
Was that line so good you had to use it twice?

Collective society? Sounds communistic/socialist.

Why are Ameriposts so embarrassing?

No problema Nigel Mohamed. Make sure you bin that knife and pray.

Lack of an education.

>America
>Collectivist

Attached: 1525276943501.jpg (480x270, 9K)

mutts are only strong on their words. their idea of war is UAV shooting at unarmed civilians or people actually defending their country they call terrorists.
when it comes to real war, with a serious fighting force like russia or china who have enough air defences to completely nullify mutt air superiority, then americans shit their pants and cry for their mommas. they are only strong against weak non-countries.

Were not 19th century England. Iraq had the 4th largest standing army in the world when the US invaded and we dismantled them quickly

We leveled Vietnam when they were getting support from china and Russia

And even during the Korean War we annhilated both North Korea and Chinese militaries while Russia was giving support

Well what are the nukes for? That nullifies everything

iraqi army was a bunch of obsolete disorganized shit liek all arab armies, it wasnt even a challenge.
you lost vietnam
you were getting your shit kicked in korea until you called for truce
kys stupid delusional mutt

You have it backwards

We are an individualist nation, at least were

nationalism in of itself isn't "collectivist"

>dying for your country
>in some middle eastern shithole
Tell me how is this defending your country again?

The only reason we stopped the Korean War was because our libshit president at the time didn’t let us use the nukes in China and Russia

And how did we lose Vietnam when we killed 8 million Vietnamese and completely destroyed their country?

>having this much of a Napoleon complex
Ill admit our air force are weaklings but we haven't unleashed our full military might in decades. We could glass the middle east if we wished or turn China into a crater. Thing is we actually try to limit civilian casualties but people dont understand that civilians will die in all wars.

>taking our neocolonial territory skirmishes seriously as a reflection of our full military capability

I wonder why China or Russia hasn't fought us head on yet then

surely it would be a cakewalk and we've been sailing ships around their borders for decades

>israeli flag jumps to defend mutts
mmm....

USSR also had nukes by then
>And how did we lose Vietnam
by not being victorious, kek

1.We basically won Vietnam but then had to leave due to mass public outcry for peace back home. You can blame the counterculture hippie fucks for that

2. We were shitting on North Korea and it's Russian/Chinese arms until 3 million Chinese soldiers zerg rushed us. Even then we could have won but Truman convinced McArthur to not nuke the entire Korean-Chinese border, effectively stopping the chinese support

We are one of the most warlike cultures in history. Sparta didn't even support war as much as we do its insane.

lmao OP BTFO'd

>If USA so weak, why not everyone invade it yet? yuropoors BTFO

Even fucking Swedes are more wiling to fight for their country than Amerimutts

mutts brain works in misterious ways

Attached: mutt's last moments.webm (960x540, 2.77M)

Yeah they had maybe 20-30 in 1950-51 while we had 1000. We would have annhilated every single Russian and Chinese person. The world would unironically have been a better place

all they could’ve done is nuke Seattle, SF and LA, places we don’t give two fucks about

fuck off eastfag

No matter what in real life, you’d rather be liberated by us than Russia or China

Americans don't distinguish between being willing to fight for your country and being willing to defend your country.

One of them involves fucking off to some sandy shithole half a world away so the billionaires in control can make a few extra pennies, while the other involves protecting your family and home from an invading, hostile power. America has rarely needed to seriously defend itself, the last time being WW2 (even then, no fighting or bombing took place on the mainland). Today all of your neighbours are weak and you're the the richest nation on the planet in terms of resources and wealth.

>I wonder why China or Russia hasn't fought us head on yet then
Because it would be highly detrimental to their economies you retard.

What do you call September 11 then?

Doesn't seem to stop Putin from doing retarded shit right now

wrong. id rather be liberated by russia or china
still enough to destroy you while massive soviet forces conquer whole of europe and their territory was so massive you wouldnt have a chance to drop the nukes since most of your airforce would be shotdown before even crossing into soviet airspace

Sure sounds like you wanted to be liberated by Russia when their closest ally in your region (Serbia) tried to genocidally annihilate you

How do you propose that their nukes reach North America before ours reach Russia?

We had a few rockets already made by the 1950s. Good luck shooting those down

>We basically won
you lost
and again, north korea had barely armed army of untrained peasants, you just bombed them indiscriminately, killing women and children and in whole more than 30% of its total population, when real army came you were beaten like little bitches. nice stuff to brag about, mutt

A false flag to justify the American government's imperialism

Ameribear: The Thread

>Spain 21%

That's accurate.

id rather live in yugosalavia than in this imperialist shithole colony. also west fueled nationalism on all sides to make war happen since they wanted to dismantel our country, so its again your fault.
a few without long enough range to hit anything important

>barely armed
>supplied with new Russian weapons, artillery, tanks, and MIGS

Also
>~6 million vs 1 million
>even

>56%
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: 1498130721546.png (400x416, 93K)

There was no real conventional battle in Korea that the USA lost, so what are you talking about?

Yeah because speaking Serbian instead of English would have been very good for your development if the Serbs didn’t shoot you all, idiot Croat

>56% wouldn't fight for America
Hmm

How could the war be lost if national gdp was pushing 6% growth?

serbian and croatian are identical languages you moron. i also speak english, russian and a bit of german
they didnt get new weapons but old surplus shit they didnt even know how to use

Successful Israeli brainwashing

by losing. north vietnam won. you lost despite havin an army two times bigger than north vietnam there

The objective of the war wasn't to have a jungle gook bbq.

brainwashing

>18%
Should be 0%, I'm ashamed that still 18% are Nazis.